Originally posted by bigpluck
WHEN WAS THE LAST WHITE ON WHITE WAR STUPID ASS!!!!SINCE HITLER RIGHT? ALSO NOTE THIS,IF GERMANY AND JAPAN WERE ALLIES WHEN HITLER WAS TRYING TO TAKE
OVER THE WORLD, THEN WHY DID THEY BOMB NAGASAKI AND HIROSHIMA, INSTEA OF JUST BOMB WHOLE RACIST WHITE ANGLO SAXON GERMANY?
Stupid ass? Whoa easy buddy!
Also by that point in time Germany had SURRENDERED to the Allied Powers? What's the point of nuking a nation that's surrendered? And if they did do
you think that the Soviets wouldn't do anything? Also there's ample evidence that, if a weapon as devastating as nuclear bombs WEREN'T dropped, the
Japanese would have fought to the last man, woman and child.
Lastly 'anglo-saxon' applies to people of white, English descent (Anglo - Angles and Saxons were Germanic tribes that invaded Britain after the
evacuation of Roman soldiers) so I don't see Germans as 'anglo-saxon'.
Also shouldn't you be thanking all the 'white' Americans, British, French, Polish, Russians etc that fought (and beat) Nazi Germany and Japan?
Originally posted by bigpluck
ALSO THE KOREAN WAR, THE VIETNAM WAR, AND THE WAR ON IRAQ, ALL THESE COUNTRIES ARE PEOPLE OF COLOR,WHEN WAS THA LAST WHITE ON WHITE WAR? IS IT
BECAUSE EUROPEANS HAVE NOTHING TO TAKE FROM EACHOTHER?OR IS IT SOME TYPE OF PEACE TREATY BETWEEN THE WHITES IN SOME TYPE OF SECRET RACIST
SOCIETY,
Korean War: North Korea (backed by China) invades South Korea, fought off by U.N/U.S forces.
Vietnam:U.S invaded Vietnam, believing that ,if Vietnam fell, then other South East Asian nations would also fall to Communism.
Iraq:U.S invaded (largely) to gain control over oil.
Did you know that the vast majority of soldiers in these wars were white? And that it was (largely) white people opposing the latter two wars? Also
the reason why 'whites' never fought was because the predominantly 'white' nations were either part of Nato or the Warsaw Pact, and a war between
them would lead to the destruction of most of the world.
Originally posted by bigpluck
WHITES WILL EVEN HAVE OTHER RACES FIGHT FOR THEM TO MAKE THEM FELL PATRIOTIC IN A WAR PUTTING THER'RE LIVES ON THE FRONT LINE TO MAKE THEM THINK THEY
ARE DOING RIGHT BY FIGHTING FOR THEY'RE WAR, WHAT THE # IS UP WITH THAT?!!!!!!!
Tell that to the predominantly 'white' U.S soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan. And I don't believe that the U.S government is dragging other 'races'
into the conflicts there. Also how would sending 'racial auxiliaries' make anyone feel patriotic?
Originally posted by bigpluck
EVERYTHING IS WHITE AND FOR THE WHITE RACE BENIFIT, WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER RACES IN THE WORLD OF COLOR? YOU DONT GIVE A # BECAUSE YOU HAVE THIS COMPLEX
THAT YOU ARE RECESSIVE AND THAT YOU ARE REALY THE ONLY MINORITY IN THIS WORLD,BLACKS CAN PRODUCE ANY COLOR,WHITES CAN ONLY PRODUCE WHITE AND NOTHING
ELSE!!!!!!!!!
Right. Is that why most East Asian countries (such as China) are swiftly (and some are already) becoming major players in the global economy/military?
Also this 'complex' you are talking about. Wouldn't it be reinforced by Afrocentrics like you calling 'white's hellspawn?
And, contrary to your beliefs, blacks can't produce ANY colour, same as whites can't.
Originally posted by bigpluck
THATS WHY A LOT OF WHITE FEMALES IN AMERICA AND ALL OVER THE WORLD IN SOME WAY WANT TO HAVE A MIXED BABY, BEVAUSE THEY KNOW THAT COLOR IS BEAUTIFUL
AND LOOKS HEALTHIER!!!!!!!
Where do you get your information from? Afrocentric media/websites because I have never (online or elsewhere) heard about the 'increase' in white
females having 'mixed' children (and don't say that 'it's because the media is white owned etc'). What about 'white males'? What if they want
'mixed' children? Also being 'black' does not make you any more/less healtheir than anyone else (genetics excluded).
. 
