In this way ,Israel would never have peace., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 16-7-2006 @ 12:13 PM by gejia021
Israel is a different race of international society, this nation has a pitiful misery history, it had been once thoroughly destroyed , the people was destitute and homeless, live scatteredly all over the world . But, once their misery comes to be a conclusion, they injure the others with the method and the determination actually more inferior than the inflicters.

International society's game rule in their eyes is a trash, they always defer to their own will, perhaps also defer to US's . Their tough pose to Arabic world makes it very difficult to believe their peace will. Perhaps US and Israel do not need the peace. What they need is a split、 backward and disordered Arabic world.

In September, 28th ,2000, Sharon forcefully visited Muslim's holy land Aqsa mosque, it had initiated the large-scale bloody clash and attacks aims to Israel including Israel’s revenge , and it continues till today. The Israeli might say they has suffered from Arab's terror attack, but Sharon's behavior was a serious provocationt. Did Sharon believe Islamism? Certainly did’t. With such a sensitive status, why he had to visit the Muslim religion place which did not welcome him to go? All people know his intentions . He went to there as an occupier, and he had shamed Islamism.

Days ago, the Hizballah had attacked Israel's military foothold, but Israel actually bombing Lebanon's civil facility, including power plant and common people. Why they has to use this extreme way to face a challenge? Is there any difference between their actions and terrorists’? Chinese has an archaism, “Too hard has been easy break off”, if Israel could be always tough to the Arab nation while not to injure themselves?

The millennium immortal thing doesn’t exist, In a positively long period ,US could cover up for Israel, but US themselves couldn’t be able to dominate the world forever. Israeli’s future outlet, should be lives in peace together with the Arab nation, but peace which won by gun is short-lived after all. With the bigger violence to entreats violence, it only can create more and more violence and bleed,.The intelligent Jews should understand this as a truth, why do they want to stride on the wrong path ?

If Israel continues the present policy, I could say, they will never be able to have peace,nay, even if they get only one defeat, the newborn Israel may no more exist, the Israeli would’t have the opportunity to found a nation once more in the Palestinian area forever.



my blog : hi.baidu.com/gejia


reply posted on 16-7-2006 @ 01:50 PM by TheBandit795
Hey sometimes Israel is the one starting the attacks. Remember when they attacked a U.S. Navy ship??

For peace to happen in that area, all sides have to be treated equally by the international community. One side cannot be given preferential treatment over the other. Israel should not have better treatment than Syria, Lebanon or Iran and vice versa.

And I'm not talking about Hezbollah, because they're not a country, IMO they're a terrorist entity.


reply posted on 17-7-2006 @ 01:28 PM by Freedom_for_sum
Originally posted by TheBandit795
Hey sometimes Israel is the one starting the attacks. Remember when
they attacked a U.S. Navy ship??


I think it's interesting that, as a "super moderator" you conclude that Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate--despite the fact that there was no official investigation in the matter. It seems to me that, as a moderator, the standards are higher for you when you make statements like these. You should provide facts backing your claims; not speculations. I guess you have your finger on the pulse of political/diplomatic matters of the time--NOT. Is it really that easy for you to assume the worse about our government and our allies? I didn't realize Arubians were so cynical.

[edit on 17-7-2006 by Freedom_for_sum]


reply posted on 17-7-2006 @ 01:43 PM by ThePieMaN
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
I think it's interesting that, as a "super moderator" you conclude that Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate--despite the fact that there was no official investigation in the matter. It seems to me that, as a moderator, the standards are higher for you when you make statements like these. You should provide facts backing your claims; not speculations. I guess you have your finger on the pulse of political/diplomatic matters of the time--NOT. Is it really that easy for you to assume the worse about our government and our allies? I'd leave my country if I thought for one second my government was deliberately in the business of killing our own citizens or covering up the murder of our citizens. My question to you is: What are you still doing here? (I'm making the assumption that you're in the US. If not; please say so. I'll be able to understand your left-wing position on this matter if you're not).


What does his super-moderator status have to do with his having an opinion? He is still allowed to voice his opinion here just like any other member that is not breaking the rules.
You like anyone else are just as free to do a web search and form your own opinion by going to the available sites and read for yourself what occurred. There is plenty of text available explaining the occurence in detail by not just one person but many American servicemen who were on that ship. If you choose to ignore that flyovers, and torpedo boats flying at close range could not differentiate Allied ships from Enemy ships then I wouldn't know what to say. It was not a 2 minute engagement. Israel is a foreign government. They are not American. To suggest that someone have to move from The USA or whatever country they are in just because they disagree with past attrocities is an outrageous request.


reply posted on 19-7-2006 @ 12:31 PM by Freedom_for_sum
Originally posted by TheBandit795
So since when did I become the subject of discussion?


When you attempted to "hijack" the subject by bringing up history that is irrelevent to the topic of this thread (which, BTW, is against ATS policy). The context of this thread is based on what has happened in the last few years and is largely anti-Israel. Events in the last few years makes events from the 60's irrelevent.

Israel, in its persuit of peace, gave Gaza to the Palestinians. In response, the PA took the position that it was their relentless attacks that "made" Israel return Gaza to them. They, therfore, vowed to continue attacking until they "get back" the rest of "their" territory. It is in their (PA) charter to destroy Israel.

It was Hezbollah who decided to launch an offensive; by kidnapping an Israeli soldier and launching a small scale rocket attack in northern Israel. THEY started this mess!!! This despite UN Resolution 1559 that required the Lebonese to disarm Hezbollah in exchange for Israel leaving the southern areas. Israel complied. Lebonon did not. And now Hezbollah, whose sole purpose of existence is to destroy Israel, is responsible for this mess. Even their Arabian (Muslim) neighbors acknowledge this!! Why can't the author of this thread??

It is my sincere hope that Syria AND Iran BOTH get dragged into this and that we, as well as the rest of the western governments, are put into a position to assist in the destruction of these two Islamic governments. Iran, Syria, and the PA are the ONLY reasons that peace CANNOT exist in the middle east. These are Islamist governments and because they follow the literal teachings of Islam they will NEVER live side-by-side with Israel. Israel will never have peace as long as these governments exist.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 19 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 9 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags