It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


It is time to make a new forum

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 11:25 AM
We all know that if the situation in the middle east continues like this we are gonna have a world war so i propose a new forum concerning all the events that will lead to world war 3.I know that i am going to be pounded by peace loving people but c'mmon wake up guys.NKorea had to test its missiles on this month so did the increase in tension with india and pakistan over 7\11.It's time that you make a ne forum and that forum would soon replace the war on terror in the near future.I hate to say this "# just got real" this month.

[edit on 16-7-2006 by warthog911]

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 11:28 AM
Theres a middle east forum on pts. I think its a bit soon for a ww3 forum,it's not kicked off just yet.

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 02:46 PM
when WWIII kicks off , are you really going to stop and log on to ATS to discuss it ??

i am not , thats for certain

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 02:50 PM
You could start a 'WWIII Watch' forum.

But I think a lot of that would be repeat links from PTS and from
the latest world news forums.

And I agree with Ape .. When the nukes start flying no one is going
to be on ATS discussing it. I am of the opinion that we are in WWIII
now .. but it just hasn't gone nuclear YET.

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 02:52 PM
That's for sure do you think we would have Internet still up and running?
I don't.
Its not gonna be pretty, seriously think of the enormity if a world war did start.
Its not like it was back in the second world war.

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 02:55 PM
Just a few days ago the Middle-East Conflict forum was created to deal specificly with what is going on now.

I suppose it could be upgraded to WWIII forum if the nukes start flying, But like others have said, I doubt we'll be online much if that happens.


posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 02:57 PM
I too agree with FlyersFan and Ape--with all due respect to this great site, I can think of a few better things to do during a World War than seeing what someone else thinks of Bush's bad hair day. Aside from that, while I'm sure the conspiracy aspects of it would be there, I think they would probably be less important than discussing the actual details of the war (which would most likely be more suited for PTS). The conspiracy issues would best be held until after the fact, when there might actually be something to accomplish and more of the details are known.

Originally posted by FlyersFan
I am of the opinion that we are in WWIII now .. but it just hasn't gone nuclear YET.

A bit off topic, but this is something I was wanting to ask earlier: could we actually sit down and say "This is a world war now."? I mean, (although I doubt many members could remember) back in WWI and WWII, when did they say "Okay, this isn't just a police action, or a little skirmish between a couple of countries now. This is something big."? Is there some gauge for it, like there needs to be X number of countries involved, or X number of casualties?

Just curious...

posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 05:39 PM
i think you are right . there should be a special place for debating middle-east and ww3 problems because all forums debating on things that are somehow related to the middle-east wars are turning to a mess with accusation from both sides not based on evidences and researches.
it's begining to become like all the chats we see on other forums
don't forget we are on ATS, and we are the best

i assume i replied to some of these posts , i had to , sometimes they oblige you to do that.

i think that (in forums like these) posts should be blocked if points are not well justified

i don't know how can you do this , maybe we'll have a forum to have suggestions.

i hope you understood what i meant
ViVa ATS!!!

and keep the good work

new topics

top topics


log in