posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 06:05 PM
Originally posted by Cyrus
U CANT BE SERIOUS....
what's all this about then??
o my god....he's got a tape of...
do u have a link for this???
Well he says he doesn't have the tape. What happened was the rape victim reported the incident to Princess Diana, who for some reason - which I
cannot understand - recorded the conversation. The tape was then locked into a box, which fell into Burrell's hands after the Princess died. During
his trial for theft from the Royal Family, the tape was apparently stolen from Burell.
He's stated that Diana told him the contents of the tapes but denied having heard the tape "all the way though", which implies that he heard at
least some of it. Either way, he's fully aware of who the mystery rapist is, as apparently are most people working in the Palace, and those who work
in the media. It's been an open secret for some time in that arena, but due to libel laws they can't publicly state what they know - within the UK
anyway. An Italian newspaper claimed that it would publish the full facts this week, so if that happens, with the Internet it'll be all around the
world in minutes anyhow.
Burell also claims to have information about a senior Royal caught engaged in 'same-sex activity' with a servant, and this always seem to mentioned
whenever the rape tape is brought up, so maybe this is mentioned on the tape too, or the same Royal was involved in both incidents?
I've had a quick google around for any transcripts of his recent TV interviews, but I could only find this one, which doesn't really go into as
much depth as the ones I saw:
If you search some UK newspaper sites you'll probably get some deeper info.