It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
do you think he's up for the popularity of it all?? or does he really care
Originally posted by Cyrus
U CANT BE SERIOUS....
what's all this about then??
o my god....he's got a tape of...
do u have a link for this???
Originally posted by SabbyJ
Originally posted by Cyrus
U CANT BE SERIOUS....
what's all this about then??
o my god....he's got a tape of...
do u have a link for this???
thanks for keeping me posted on the matter, much appreciated.
my guess is the royals aren't as clean as they once were...covering their tracks seems their most challenging aspect in their "so called" lives.
what with the media/papparazzi increasing in number and desperation this proves an ever-complicating task to fulfill.
they're bound to crack under the pressure sometime, some1 will slip(harry seems to know nothing of this...one hopes he ends up giving the game away)
this information is strictly for information purposes only, i am not held responsible for anything written on here(making sure im not sued here!!)
Well he says he doesn't have the tape. What happened was the rape victim reported the incident to Princess Diana, who for some reason - which I cannot understand - recorded the conversation. The tape was then locked into a box, which fell into Burrell's hands after the Princess died. During his trial for theft from the Royal Family, the tape was apparently stolen from Burell.
He's stated that Diana told him the contents of the tapes but denied having heard the tape "all the way though", which implies that he heard at least some of it. Either way, he's fully aware of who the mystery rapist is, as apparently are most people working in the Palace, and those who work in the media. It's been an open secret for some time in that arena, but due to libel laws they can't publicly state what they know - within the UK anyway. An Italian newspaper claimed that it would publish the full facts this week, so if that happens, with the Internet it'll be all around the world in minutes anyhow.
Burell also claims to have information about a senior Royal caught engaged in 'same-sex activity' with a servant, and this always seem to mentioned whenever the rape tape is brought up, so maybe this is mentioned on the tape too, or the same Royal was involved in both incidents?
I've had a quick google around for any transcripts of his recent TV interviews, but I could only find this one, which doesn't really go into as much depth as the ones I saw:
www.abc.net.au...
If you search some UK newspaper sites you'll probably get some deeper info.
Originally posted by squintingcat
its not that the rapist is a mystery its the fact of who covered it up that will cause the poop.the fact it was covered and who ordered it covered and that even the the most senior royals knew about it wont shine the best light on the royal family.
dosent anyone think publishing the book about diana may make him live a lot longer?
Originally posted by Silk
Burrell has now in my book reached the lowest form of evolved life possible. Even below journalists. This man has bitten the hand that fed him - and plays on the sympathy of a nation for a Lady who although was nothing to many people in this world gave hope and charity to many people. The man is scum and a shadow of his former employer.