reply to post by DisgustedOne
I see your point. It would be a huge endeavor. And perhaps there could be easier ways to get us all on board some NWO type agenda.
I am actually not terribly conspiracy minded, lol, despite appearances, but I am open minded, and I love considering points of view. This one
fascinates me, though I dont think I am a "believer" in any way. I am just at a "hmmmm that poses some interesting possibilities" stage in my
considerations.
What led me to ATS initially was the UFO over O'Hare airport. Something about that caught my attention like no other UFO sighting before. (And I
live in Ne Mexico currently, so the whole UFO thing is something I am familiar with, and have happily ignored for the most part till then.)
That whole things still strikes me as "odd." Something about it, and the governments response (or lack thereof considering the media coverage) just
has me really wondering if the reason they are not responding at all is because they had something to do with it.
Shortly after that, I ran across some project Blue Beam stuff. And then, rightly or wrongly, the whole O'Hare thing started to make more sense, when
I considered it in that context. Bear in mind, I am not on board that ship, only I can see how that would make sense.
Why go to so much trouble? Well, governments have gone to enormous trouble in the past, and not so recent past, to get whole countries on board.
Hitler, the US government to get us on board the War on Terror thing, etc. Propaganda has been refined to an art form.
Obviously, without the hologram technology this would be a wash. But we know we have it. We just dont know for certain if it can now be used in that
way, on that scale. We know they have the media nicely consolidated, so aside from some "live shows" most of it could be handled with CGI, (much
easier) and the MSM.
IF, and this is a big IF, they also had the technology some call ELF, to actually and factually project words and voices into our heads, and it really
could be done from cell phone towers as many of the people who support this idea claim, this really would not be that difficult to accomplish.
Why get so many on board? Well globalization has left us with few choices for "enemies" on planet. No one is going to believe the "expendable"
countries, (that have no resources Corporations might want; ie third world countries without oil and water) are a real threat. We KNOW bushmen arent
capable of endangering us. It would be unwise if you are trying to unite the first world countries into a single "corporation" to promote animosity
between them, and so an "off world" enemy seems perfectly reasonable.
AND, if you are the guys masterminding this mess, you DONT want a mob of people turning on YOU. It has to be accomplished in a way that seems to
leave you out of it, in case it goes horribly wrong. SO, it really couldnt be a "hostile takeover." Too risky.
Since using an "enemy" or "religion" has worked so well in the past, and the guys in charge really are sort of traditionalists in that they tend
to use the same strategies over and over if they work, why wouldnt some completely new spin on the game be what they plan next? New and improved
technology, but same old game they have been playing with us for the last 2000 years at least.
A "rapture" or "ET attack" would also explain away the disappearance of people that were not useful to them, or dangerous to them. They could
choose to take anyone from anywhere, and not look like bad guys. "oh so and so was raptured!" not murdered and disposed of for being a problem.
In fact whole countries full of "useless people" could be culled in this way, and they could get a handle on their "live stock." Us. Sort of
like the "clearances" in Europe back in the day, or what was done to the Native Americans, but on a grander scale.
Anyway, just some thoughts. As I said, I am not completely onboard that this IS what is going on, but using logic and history alone as my guides, it
certainly is reasonable to consider it.
Whether or not they have the technology to pull it off is the big question that remains for me. If they did, I would say that certainly they WOULD.
Why wouldnt they? They have in the past. Many, many times.