It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is the United States bankrupt? Many would scoff at this notion. Others would argue that financial implosion is just around the corner. This paper explores these views from both partial and general equilibrium perspectives. It concludes that countries can go broke, that the United States is going broke, that remaining open to foreign investment can help stave off bankruptcy, but that radical reform of U.S. fiscal institutions is essential to secure the nation’s economic future.
The paper offers three policies to eliminate the nation’s enormous fiscal gap and avert bankruptcy: a retail sales tax, personalized Social Security, and a globally budgeted universal healthcare system.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, July/August 2006, 88(4), pp. 235-49.
How are the Bush administration and Congress
planning to deal with the fiscal gap? The answer,
apparently, is to make it worse by expanding
discretionary spending while taking no direct
steps to raise receipts. The costs of hurricanes
Katrina and Rita could easily total $200 billion
over the next few years. And the main goal of the
President’s tax reform initiative will likely be to
eliminate the alternative minimum tax.
This administration’s concern with long-term
fiscal policy is typified by the way it treated the
Treasury’s original fiscal gap study. The study
was completed in the late fall of 2002 and was
slated to appear in the president’s 2003 budget
to be released in early February 2003. But when
Secretary O’Neill was ignominiously fired on
December 6, 2002, the study was immediately
censored. Indeed, Gokhale and Smetters were told
within a few days of O’Neill’s firing that the study
would not appear in the president’s budget. The
timing of these events suggests the study itself
may explain O’Neill’s ouster or at least the timing
of his ouster. Publication of the study would, no
doubt, have seriously jeopardized the passage of
the administration’s Medicare drug benefit as well
as its third tax cut.
For their part, the Democrats have studiously
avoided any public discussion of the country’s
long-term fiscal problems. Senator Kerry made
no serious proposals to reform Social Security,
Medicare, or Medicaid during the 2004 presidential
campaign. And his Democratic colleagues
in Congress have evoked Nancy Reagan’s mantra—
“Just say no!”—in response to the president’s
repeated urging to come to grips with Social
Security’s long-term financing problem.
The Democrats, of course, had eight long years
under President Clinton to reform our nation’s
most expensive social insurance programs. Their
failure to do so and the Clinton administration’s
censorship of an Office of Management and
Budget generational accounting study, which was
slated to appear in the president’s 1994 budget,
speaks volumes about the Democrats’ priorities
and their likely future leadership in dealing with
our nation’s fiscal fiasco.
The fiscal irresponsibility of both political
parties has ominous implications for our children
and grandchildren. Leaving our $65.9 trillion bill
for today’s and tomorrow’s children to pay will
roughly double their average lifetime net tax rates
(defined as the present value of taxes paid net of
transfer payments received divided by the present
value of lifetime earnings).
Originally posted by m_w_0_8_0
The U.S. has been going "bankrupt" for years now, sadly.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
There was a similar post a while ago and I did some research and we seem to be around the middle of the pack as far debt vs. GDP with the other industrialized G7 nations, so if we're going bankrupt you are all going bankrupt too
Aging populatarions and soaring medical costs are a problem for all modern industrialized countries, not the just the U.S. Of course there are many different solutions, just it's hard to get anything done since people on the left and right have such differing views on what exactly to do.
But I believe eventually something will be done, so I think to say "we're going bankrupt!" is a bit like chicken little saying "The sky is falling!"
Originally posted by Zion Mainframe
The paper offers three policies to eliminate the nation’s enormous fiscal gap and avert bankruptcy: a retail sales tax, personalized Social Security, and a globally budgeted universal healthcare system.
Read the full report here: research.stlouisfed.org... (PDF!)
excerpt from the link (research.stlouisfed.org...)
(find this heading on page (14 of 16) at Zion Mainframe link noted above)
Eliminating the Fiscal Gap
- -> A 33 percent federal retail-sales tax rate
would generate federal revenue equal to 21 percent of GDP - -
The same figure that prevailed in 2000.
Currently, federal revenues equal 16 percent of GDP - -
So, we are talking here about a major tax hike.
But, we're also talking some major spending cuts.
First, Social Security would be paying only its accrued benefits
over time, which is trillions of dollars less than the projected
benefits, when measured in present value.
Second, we would be putting a lid on the growth of
healthcare expenditures.
Limiting excessive growth in these expenditures will, over time,
make up for the initial increase in federal healthcare spending
arising from the move to Universal coverage.
[...]
You have voted iskander for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
The US has a future shortage of $66 TRILLION due to baby boomer retirements, and more need for social security.
By any measure America's debt is small, SHRINKING and perfectly manageable. The key to managing a countries debt is GROWTH. Grow the economy and all will be well. How to grow the economy? CUT TAXES and REDUCE regulation. But especially CUT TAXES
Rising debts and increasing bankruptcies are the result of Congress suspending the free coinage of metals - into money - and switching us to bank credits as our medium of exchange. These acts converted our nation from a wealth monetary system, where people created money for society's benefit through the fruits of their labor, to a monetary system, where now ....
All new money is loaned into circulation as an interest bearing debt. Since this system only creates the "principal" and never the interest, the debt is always greater than the money supply. Click here for an analogy.
This fraudulently created debt forces American citizens to borrow constantly so the system can function. Eventually, the process becomes unworkable as society, mortgaged to the hilt, can no longer afford to borrow. This debt creates extreme stress for us as we struggle to meet impossible money obligations. The results are: a constantly rising cost-of-living, layoffs, family breakdown, increased drug and alcohol use, an increase in crime and a general moral breakdown. Because of the MOTIVE behind this system, we also have corruption in government, a failing (failed) education system, social tension and a justice system at war with the people it is supposed to serve.
source: www.wealth4freedom.com...
The US has gone bankrupt many times in the past. It's loans from groups like the Rothchilds and large banks that saved the goverment from losing control.