It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 25cents
oh, i didn't mean to insinuate that i'm a libertarian. i refuse to be pigeon-holed into any one school of political thought. i was just giving an example.
Originally posted by zenlover28
Not so. Smith vs. Maryland ruled in 1979 that your phone numbers are not your personal property and are given to a third party and you should have no reasonable expectation of privacy with them. Society does not recognize it as a reasonable expectation of privacy because the numbers you dial are willfully given to the phone companies anyway. Not saying I agree with it, but that's how it is. Also you need to do your research on past presidents. You're blaming this solely on Bush.
And also, the 4th Amendment only says that you have the right to be secure in your persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures and refers to places to be searched. No mention of privacy there when it comes to your phone number or anything else for that matter.
Ummm okay. I suppose the rest of your post is referring to Guantanamo Bay exclusively. Now, first off I want to say that I in no shape, form or fashion agree with the torture that has gone on there. However, I do have to take a reality check every now and again and realize that place is Disney Land compared to Russia and their treatment of Chechnans and the Chinese and the Tibet, etc. And I have to think about the realities of what happens in war time. But, just so you know Guantanamo Bay is not on U.S. soil. It is in Cuba. Now, it doesn't make it right and i'm not attempting to argue your opinion of it, just the facts of it. The Constitution does say that being born gives us a right to due process which makes it a Liberty (a freedom) and not a U.S. right. And, I think we are being hypocritical by not allowing others those freedoms regardless of being on U.S. soil or not. But, the fact remains that it isn't on U.S. soil, and that is how they look at it. Nothing I can do about it. I think it's wrong. But, that's just my humble opinion.
You know I think it's wonderful that you point at both sides. But, the thing is..you should consider the big picture. Not just the American side of things. We have to face reality. Our government has it's problems. They need to be fixed. We need to unite and attempt to fix them. Because without our government...this is the facing reality party.....you won't have those rights. We can live in a world of fantasy thinking that we can take down the U.S. government and have complete freedom with very limited government involvement. But, as our history has shown...that's not the reality of the situation. So, we need to all pull together and make needed changes while adapting to the reality of the situation in this World and get over ourselves and our complete selfishness. You know what my main problem is with Libertarians in this country? They want an egotistical society. Not that we aren't egotistical already...but I mean entirely. They don't care for the majority of people. They care for themselves and themselves only....which is what they say they are against.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Actually, Im not. Blaming it solely on Bush. Im a Libertarian, so I don't see the Democrats through rose colored glasses either. But Bush has by far been the worse offender.
Again, like I said, I didn't say that's how it should be i'm just stating the reality of the situation.
And I believe the law should be changed. Phone lines are just like private conversations. The government has no right spying on you without a warrant and probable cause. Its making citizens criminals.
No, technically it isn't...it is not on U.S. soil. The U.S....I guess you could say is sort of leasing it until we decide to give it back to Cuba.
Technically, Guantanamo bay is U.S. soil. Just like American embassies abroad are considered U.S. soil, as are military bases.
Originally posted by 25cents
skaadi.
wait. i'm going to make a whole new thread about this. probably some OTHER time when i'm drunk and can think clearly. but i'll go ahead and let you all know the gist of my intent -
YOUR THEORIES ARE FAILURES, AND YOUR ATTEMPTS AT CHANGING THE WORLD FOR THE BETTER FALL UPON DEAF, IGNORANT EARS
kk, i'm done.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Militant Centrism: Compromise or I'll kill you!
they knew of pearl harbor, project northwoods, 9-11, and many others.... it just simply makes me sick. im sorry if i sound so condescending (sp?) but these types of things shouldnt go over so easily without our great citizens being able to do something about it.
Originally posted by yeah right
you are SICK IN THE HEAD AND SHOULD BE DESTROYED......
if YOU think that it is OK to SACRIFICE even 1 persons life........
and i'll bet all of YOUR money the sacrifice WILL NOT BE YOU........ huh?!
we might as well be in aztec times
and cut the hearts out of YOUR VICTIMS.............SAME F'in THING!!!!!!!!!
no we just send them off to kill as many as they can before they get killed.........
coward!
Yeah, well that's what you get for thinking. If you read me at all, then you'll know that I am one of the people always saying that I don't like the way this country is heading. However, I try to remain objective about it as much as possible instead of going to the extreme...because I don't live in la la land. I live in reality. I didn't buy and read the book, "Libertarianism for Dummies" or whatever the case.
Originally posted by interestedalways
I don't think this is a debate. It is a tirade against anyone who doesn't like the turn this country is taking.
Ummm, we're not responsible enough....how do you think our country got here in the first place? Do you think the government just took all this power or do you think we handed it over to them?
When the powers that be decide for the individual his personal choices and regulates them Life Liberty and Pursuit of Hapiness is definitely being challenged by those who deem we aren't responsible enough to choose for ourselves.
Yeah, yeah yeah. Blah, blah blah. Well, you know I don't want some arrogant selfish idiot running off with my purse and getting away with it....or not serving my African American or Hispanic friends or some child molester molesting children just because his selfish arse wants to do what he wants.
To create a law is to create a crime. We are all criminals to some degree. If you don't see the writing on the wall where this country is going just wait.
Socialist eh? I thought the rhetoric around here was that the country was heading towards Fascism? I can't keep up with it all. But, yeah we have been heading towards Socialism mainly because the good hearted Liberals decided a few minorities needed to be treated as equals and deserved some rights just like you....you know...because they weren't equals and because society wasn't responsible like you claim.
I don't want to debate with you because you are coming off as mean spirited and arrogant. Defend all you want about what the US is or isn't involved in. The truth will be seen sooner than you think. I don't claim to read the future but it doesn't take a psychic to see the Fabian/Socialist style the government is imaging.
Originally posted by interestedalways
IMO the law in 1979 that allowed phone numbers to be given isn't the same as allowing our phone conversations to be monitered. That is a play on words to make it sound like the same thing.
And the point of your post is what exactly?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
ZenLover, I am sure you have an important point to make; I just can't quite figure out what it is.
Yeah well duh it kind of is a "bad" thing.
You seem to be angry with anyone who is an "extremist" -- as though being someone who is extreme about anything is some sort of bad thing.
Uh huh.
I know others who are extremists toward government involvement in a person's life; interestingly enough, the left-wing statists same to save their blackest bile for the right-wing statists, as though there were much of a philosophical dfference btween the two of them! And of course, the feeling is roundly reciprocated by the right-wing statists.
Yeah, well I figured all you cared about was yourself anyhow.
But to each his own; as much as I think the statists are robbers of my liberty and property, at least I can understand that these people care about something to be extremist.
Oh yes....by the way i'm a 'herself'. And, say about my beliefs what you wish...I have more passion in my little pinky than you probably have in your entire body....because of course all you care about is YOUR Liberty and YOUR property.
That's ever so much better than someone who, by calling himself a 'moderate', says that he has no strong beliefs at all and goes where the winds of opportunity blow him.
Originally posted by zenlover28
But, just so you know Guantanamo Bay is not on U.S. soil. It is in Cuba.
Amendment XIV.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.