It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subz
I want to know how Olmert has the audacity to claim that Hezbollah's actions were an "act of war" when the Israeli soldiers were captured INSIDE Lebanon at Aita al-Shaab.
Correct me if I am wrong my fellow ATS'ers but isnt sending troops into a sovereign nation itself and "act of war"? So wouldnt it be reasonable to assume that it was infact Israel that declared war on Lebanon before the Israeli troops were captured?
The sources said the Israeli soldiers had been seized at around 9 a.m. (0600 GMT) across the border from Aita al-Shaab, some 15 km (nine miles) from the Mediterranean coast.
news.yahoo.com
Kind of changes the whole situation dont you think? Israel declared war on Lebanon by sending troops across their border. Hezbollah capturing some and killing others is completely justified since Israel invaded them.
>Fixed link
[edit on 13/7/06 by subz]
Originally posted by Jewish_hammer
hezbolalala captured (and murdered 3 soldiers too) on our own border,VERY close at our fence,thos soldiers ware at a simple petrol mission,6 (or 7) soldiers,2 hummers( or was it humvees? at any rate they set up trap after the last petrol before that one passed,broke into the fence,and shot a faw RPG's) the first hummer was a total mess,noone survived,They captured the soldiers,and ran away.
that area lacked security ,the operation was prepered for alot of time allready,and there was a definite failure to secure that area.
and no,we don't want to take over the world
Edit: and I am not an Arab.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Geez, I thought the hisbollah and hamas appeasers and apologists were quicker than this. After all, it's taken them over a week to come up with this attempted spin.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Maybe they spent too much time on the "Oh, the civilians!" spin.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
You have voted subz for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Seems like someone else didn't do their research.
Or bothered to notice the timestamps
- 2006: On July 12, Hezbollah kidnaps two Israeli soldiers in cross-border raid. Israel responds by sending in tanks and by bombing bridges and roads in south Lebanon to try to prevent the hostages from being taken north.
AP Article
“Responding to the request of the Government of Lebanon to extend the mandate of UNIFIL for a new period of six months presented in the letter from its Permanent Representative to the United Nations of 11 January 2005 to the Secretary-General (S/2005/13), while reaffirming that the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel’s withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425 and that the Blue Line must be respected in its entirety,
Originally posted by darksided
One more thing.
Guys I just went through Google Earth and compared it to the blue line establishment as recorded by the UN in resolution 1583, and the borders in Google Earth ARE NOT ACCURATE.
BTW. The reason for some of the early confusion is because the event took place in shebaa farms, which is DISPUTED by Hezbollah as Lebanon territory. Alaa Shahine, the Routers reporter who filed the Yahoo article used in this thread lives in Lebanon, so may have made the mistake of thinking this happened in Lebanon. I notice the article is corrected.
The reason shebaa farms is not recognized as Lebanese territory by the rest of the world is because Lebanon agreed to UN resolution 1558 and 1559, which established the border. The claim was later made by Lebanon that the Blue line was wrong, and shebaa farms was in Lebanon, but UN resolution 1583 which has this clause:
“Responding to the request of the Government of Lebanon to extend the mandate of UNIFIL for a new period of six months presented in the letter from its Permanent Representative to the United Nations of 11 January 2005 to the Secretary-General (S/2005/13), while reaffirming that the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel’s withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425 and that the Blue Line must be respected in its entirety,
said indeed shebaa farms does still belong to Israel as far as the UN is concerned.
Read the entire resolution available in this Press Release to get everything in context.
At the closing session of the summit, chaired by Lebanese Foreign Minister Mahmoud Hammoud, participants in the Beirut Declaration call on Israel to abide by relevant U.N. resolutions to achieve a just, durable and comprehensive peace in the Middle East.
The document urges Israel to review its policy, and to withdraw its troops from all occupied Arab lands, including Syria's Golan Heights, the Shebaa farms in southern Lebanon and alestinian lands.
The document calls on Israel to review its policy of aggression and occupation, and to withdraw its troops from all Arab lands it has been occupying since 1967, including Syria's Golan Heights, the Shebaa farms in southern Lebanon and Palestinian lands.
Originally posted by pepsi78
So the soldiers were captured out side of israely border, what were those soldiers doing there?
Originally posted by darksided
Originally posted by pepsi78
So the soldiers were captured out side of israely border, what were those soldiers doing there?
Depends who you are. The soldiers were captured in Shebaa farms, which the world and UN recognize as Israel based on Security Council Resolution, but Hezbollah considers Lebanon.
If Hezbollah was a sovereign state, maybe they could make a claim, but Lebanon signed the UN Resolution, so Hezbollah has no claim.
On May 22, 2000, Israel completed its withdrawal from the south of Lebanon in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 425 [1]. The UN certified Israel's pullout [2]. The January 20, 2005 UN Secretary-General's report on Lebanon explicitly stated: "The continually asserted position of the Government of Lebanon that the Blue Line is not valid in the Shab'a farms area is not compatible with Security Council resolutions. The Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for purposes of confirming Israel’s withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425 (1978). The Government of Lebanon should heed the Council’s repeated calls for the parties to respect the Blue Line in its entirety." [3] Timur Goksel, a spokesman for the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) told the BBC that "on all maps the UN has been able to find, the farms are seen on the Syrian side [of the border]." [BBC News (London), 25 May 2000.]
Originally posted by darksided
Originally posted by pepsi78
So the soldiers were captured out side of israely border, what were those soldiers doing there?
Depends who you are. The soldiers were captured in Shebaa farms, which the world and UN recognize as Israel based on Security Council Resolution, but Hezbollah considers Lebanon.
If Hezbollah was a sovereign state, maybe they could make a claim, but Lebanon signed the UN Resolution, so Hezbollah has no claim.
Just hours before the meeting was due to start, the Israeli Shin Bet internal Security Service arrested Abu Tir and Abu Arafa and warned them not to attend the meeting, under threats of detention. The meeting, which offered a major opportunity to obtain Shalit’s release and launch a new framework for peace, was thrown into disarray. The next day, the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) invaded Gaza, and the day after both Abu Tir and Abu Arafa were abducted by Israeli forces, along with a third of the Palestinian Cabinet, provoking a predictable escalation of violence.
Israel simultaneously began conducting covert incursions on to Lebanese territory, provoking Hizbollah’s capture of two IDF soldiers. Credible sources confirm that the soldiers were not abducted on Israeli territory, but inside Lebanon. Like the scuppered peace negotiations, Western officials have ignored this, and misinformed the media. However, some reports corroborate the sources. Israeli officials, for instance, informed Forbes (12.7.06) that “Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes Wednesday across the border in southern Lebanon, prompting a swift reaction from Israel.”