posted on Sep, 27 2006 @ 07:05 PM
Originally posted by The Vagabond
I should have specified time period. I am talking about WWII. The soviets had begun to force industrialization after the revolution, but the USSR was
still, to a certain extent, stuck in the previous century during the world wars. Further into the cold war they certainly advanced, but they were
always more about quantity than quality.
Neither their economy nor their military ever emphasized quality and precision on the level that Germany has.
German engineering in da houze.
I think in a post-industrial society, it would be mighty difficult to wage anything larger than a medium-sized short war. What gets lost in all the
talk about technology, weapons, and the Just War is just how expensive a war really is. As the First World countries slowly lose industrial capacity,
places like the United States will not be able to sustain high-intensity combat operations for long periods of time. Basically its get in, get the job
done, and get out, and that's where what you pointed out about post-industrial countries not fighting each other head-on comes from.
The bigger question to me is, is that a good thing? Large and/or long wars are never a good thing. But that does not automatically mean a small war is
a better alternative. For one, the smaller the war, the less caution and restraint would be exercised by the political leaders.
As Mr. Dunnigan said, the next war will take years to prepare for. And while advances in information technology have made war a bit easier to execute,
that ease only gives even less margin for error.