posted on Jul, 10 2006 @ 11:02 PM
It looks like lawmakers will be sweating this one out as the evidence unfolds.
By TONI LOCY
WASHINGTON Jul 10, 2006 (AP)— A federal judge on Monday upheld the FBI's unprecedented raid of a congressional office, saying that barring searches
of lawmakers' offices would turn Capitol Hill into "a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime."
Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan rejected requests from lawmakers and Rep. William Jefferson to return material seized by the FBI in a May
20-21 search of Jefferson's office.
The overnight search was part of a 17-month bribery investigation of Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat.
In a 28-page opinion, Hogan dismissed arguments by Jefferson and a bipartisan group of House leaders that the raid violated the Constitution's
protections against intimidation of elected officials.
Hogan acknowledged the "unprecedented" nature of the case. But he said the lawmakers' "sweeping" theory of legislative privilege "would have the
effect of converting every congressional office into a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime."
A member of Congress is bound by the same laws as ordinary citizens, said the judge, who had approved the FBI's request to conduct the overnight
search of Jefferson's office.
Jefferson had sought the return of several computer hard drives, floppy disks and two boxes of paper documents that FBI agents seized during the
18-hour search of his Rayburn Building office.
Hogan said the Justice Department can retake custody of the materials, which President Bush ordered held by the solicitor general until Congress and
the agency could work out procedures for future raids on congressional offices.
Jefferson's lawyer, Robert Trout, said he was not surprised by the ruling and would appeal as soon as possible. Trout is expected to ask Hogan to
stay his ruling to keep the materials away from investigators until an appeals court looks at the case.
"While a congressman is not above the law, the executive branch must also follow the law," Trout said. "We appreciate the consideration the judge
accorded our motion for the return of the seized property, but we respectfully disagree with his conclusion."
From NY Times
WASHINGTON, July 10 — While acknowledging the unprecedented nature of the F.B.I. search of Representative William J. Jefferson’s legislative
offices, a federal judge ruled Monday that the seizure of records there was legal and did not violate the constitutional separation of powers between
Congress and the executive branch.
And the Washington Post