It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EdenKaia
Matter=Energy
Space=Energy
Time=Energy
Space = Time
Originally posted by Protector
Are you serious? Did you not read the actual mathematical and scientific posts that I made?
Matter is expressed as related to energy (e=mc^2)
Space is a location for Energy to show its properties (potential and kinetic). Or Space is just 3-d "space".
Time is a quantified measurement of a 4th dimensional property.
SPACE DOES NOT EQUAL TIME!
And if you insist on continuing your pointless discussion, use the term TRANSFORM--where one state turns into another... not EQUAL TO another.
the rant forum is down the hall. Calm down, have fun, and contribute what you have to say that is actually constructive. Anything else is just a waste of time that is just going to incite an argument. Follow?
if you insist on continuing your pointless discussion,
Originally posted by EdenKaia
The point of the post was actually a jest on how many posts had been made, all sounding very interesting and intelligent, but actually proving nothing at all. Honestly, if you can get this worked up over a post, I would suggest a sedative. It is fairly obvious that Space is not equal to Time. It is the same as saying that your eyeball is equal to your toenail and then trying to come up with validation. Shoot an arrow into a wall and paint a target around it. The fun is in the exploration of things that have already been "proven". What would happen if I were to suggest to you that Time=Mass? Would a little vein in your forehead explode? Really, ease up a bit. Ever hear of an ulser? And in response to your comment on my "pointless discussion":
First=-if the discussion is pointless to you, go elsewhere and find a place where you can sulk in happiness.
Second=read the question in the initial post. Where in that equation do you see "transforms", as opposed to "equal"? Everyone here is aware of the fact that matter is not equal to energy. Matter can become energy, and vice versa. We don't need someone standing on the sidelines pointing it out. I mean really,the rant forum is down the hall. Calm down, have fun, and contribute what you have to say that is actually constructive. Anything else is just a waste of time that is just going to incite an argument. Follow?
if you insist on continuing your pointless discussion,
Originally posted by Large Johnson
Space, time, & light are all the same thing.
Originally posted by NightBlade40
Let's disregard time for the moment and pretend that instead of asking whether space and time could swap places, you asked whether length and width could swap places. You should realise that you cannot solely use width to express a certain length, and vice versa. If you think of the universe as having three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension (time), you can see that we can apply the same logic with space and time as I did with width and length.
Also, matter and energy don't exactly switch places. Matter can be converted into energy and vice versa, you see the former everytime you light a match and how it gives off heat and light.
quote: Originally posted by Protector
Are you serious? Did you not read the actual mathematical and scientific posts that I made?
Matter is expressed as related to energy (e=mc^2)
Space is a location for Energy to show its properties (potential and kinetic). Or Space is just 3-d "space".
Time is a quantified measurement of a 4th dimensional property.
SPACE DOES NOT EQUAL TIME!
And if you insist on continuing your pointless discussion, use the term TRANSFORM--where one state turns into another... not EQUAL TO another.
Originally posted by Toelint
What you're saying (either of should correct me if I'm wrong.) is, where you have matter OR energy, You in essence, have both, which are different states of the same material. Well, why can't this happen with Space/Tme?
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by Toelint
Can Space and Time switch places like Matter and Energy...and is there a FORMULA forwarded by a reputable source to prove it?
Err... not sure what you're getting at here, but time isn't a factor in "space." You can have time independant of any spatial quantity and you can have spatial quantities without time. If time slows down, you don't suddenly get lots and lots of "space."
It takes you longer to get across the space, but the space hasn't expanded.
Abstract
Presented is a theory in fundamental theoretical physics that establishes the relationship between time and energy, and also the relationship between inertia and gravity. This theory abandons the concept that mass increases as a result of relativistic motion and shows instead that the extra energy related to an object undergoing such motion is a direct result of the affect that the slowing of time has on velocity. In support of this premise, new formulas are introduced for acceleration and used in conjunction with a relativistic time transformation factor to develop new equations for both kinetic and total energy that replace those of special relativity. These and subsequently derived equations for momentum, distance, acceleration, inertia, gravity, and others, establish a direct relationship between the presented theory and the principles of an earlier theory, the millennium theory of relativity. A final consequence of this theoretical analysis is the discovery of two new laws of physics involving acceleration, and the realization that a unified theory of physics is now possible.
Mrelativty.Net
Originally posted by Toelint
Why...why...WHY...am I still pondering this?! Perhaps because Space, Time, Matter and Energy are constantly slung around as a package deal in all the Science forums or something. (Not that THAT means anything.)
Okay, just maybe it DOES mean something! Can Space and Time switch places like Matter and Energy...and is there a FORMULA forwarded by a reputable source to prove it? Help me out here, folks.