It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Questions for John Lear

page: 57
39
<< 54  55  56    58  59  60 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2007 @ 12:13 PM
link   
John,


Hey how's it going? I was wondering if you could give a brief timeline on how antigravity was discovered and put to use by NASA. I dont want to misquote you but I remember you saying you beleive that you believe that the United States vistied to moon as early as the 1950s. And the main proof of antigravity tech was lack of blast crater at the moon site.

Many think that we never went to the moon and that it was all filmed in a studio somewhere(a billion dollar movie, with the best box office take ever). But others think that we are really advanced as you claim. I think we have capacites of interstellar travel. Technology in the public sector is usually 100+ years behind the private sector, and sometimes I think this gap could be even larger. It has been said that tech we possess now makes Star Wars look like elementry baby games.

Best Regards,

Lightman




posted on Apr, 13 2007 @ 12:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by niv
Lear was making a joke - why are we talking about proof?

Mr. Lear makes strange and sometimes funny "jokes" all the time, only he himself doesn't know it
!

Regards
yf



posted on Apr, 13 2007 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by niv


Funny how how most of the people that are actively trying to prove that JL's posts require proof, yet with this specific statement (about making up a large part of what is put up for discussion), nobody requires proof.. How weak. All that when the remark is so incredibly vague that it doesn't quite say anything. "A lot of.." could still only be 0.5%.


Lear was making a joke - why are we talking about proof?


because it's a joke to many of us, you and me for instance, but some people here will use that comment to dismiss everything he says from now on. I hope they don't. I thought it was funny, almost witty.

but im sure more than a few will use it as a serious answer/remark.



posted on Apr, 13 2007 @ 07:47 PM
link   
Greetings John,

Ive been a reader of these threads for a while now,and the information that i have found here has been thought provoking on many a level,kudos!

Ive been scratching my head for a while now,trying to come up with a question that would interest us,and you, whilst remaining challanging and unasked.

Since i really havent found one(ducks for cover!),i ask this instead.What is the one question you have wanted to be asked of most of all(but havent),and what would your answer be to it?



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 07:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by shadow fax

Originally posted by Ghost01

Originally posted by johnlear
Now wait just a darn minute here, I resemble that remark!


Yes you do! I see the family resmebleance quit clearly!


Tim


Do you have any idea how dumb that makes you look, Tim?

hint
[edit on 13-4-2007 by shadow fax]


Don't give me the dictonay, I was making a joke off of John's rediculas comment. I know exactly what the word means. It's your ppal John Lear who used the word "resemble" incorrectly.

You're being an insaulting jerk!

Tim

[edit on 4/14/2007 by Ghost01]



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 07:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01
/i]
Now wait just a darn minute here, I resemble that remark!


Yes you do! I see the family resmebleance quit clearly!


Tim



What John said was just an old play on words that some of us well..... older people have used for years. He was being humorous, which I really enjoy amongst all of this conspiracy stuff. Lighten up a little Tim.

[edit on 4/14/2007 by TheAvenger]



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 07:56 PM
link   
Among those I've heard use the line were Curly, Foster Brooks, and Dean Martin. They say it goes all the way back to Vaudville.



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 08:13 PM
link   
There are some of us that are interested in some of the information that john can pass on,can we PLEASE get this thread back on track,and out of the hands of highjackers?



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 09:10 PM
link   
John, What is your opinion regarding this video clip?:

www.youtube.com...

Cygnus, I'd be interested in your take also.



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 09:31 PM
link   
The dancing frog? All time classic Animation!

*am i linking to the wrong video?*
[edit on 14-4-2007 by Cygnus_Hunter]

[edit on 14-4-2007 by Cygnus_Hunter]



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 11:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cygnus_Hunter*am i linking to the wrong video?*
[edit on 14-4-2007 by Cygnus_Hunter]

You've got the right one. I was just trying to inject a little levity. I've been laughing my GD A## off for the last hour watching that clip over and over agian.

Young People: This is a good example of why you shoudn't drink and post!

[edit on 4/14/2007 by darkbluesky]



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 11:28 PM
link   
My edit didn't post correctly. Tried to fix quotes.

Here is the full version.....


www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheAvenger
What John said was just an old play on words that some of us well..... older people have used for years. He was being humorous, which I really enjoy amongst all of this conspiracy stuff. Lighten up a little Tim.

[edit on 4/14/2007 by TheAvenger]


Thank you, I've very aware of that! I was Piggybacking on John's Joke, why doesn't anyone here get that?

And Before anyone asks:

Piggyback: To use the punchline of someone else's joke to set up your own joke.

For people with a sense of humor, you all can sure be shallow! Why am I being lectured for playing off of John's sense of humor?


Tim



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Crotchety old man,wanting to see the thread move in the general area of Q and A.
You arnt hijackers,forgive me.Now put those boxcutters down.



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 02:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01

Originally posted by TheAvenger
What John said was just an old play on words that some of us well..... older people have used for years. He was being humorous, which I really enjoy amongst all of this conspiracy stuff. Lighten up a little Tim.

[edit on 4/14/2007 by TheAvenger]


Thank you, I've very aware of that! I was Piggybacking on John's Joke, why doesn't anyone here get that?

And Before anyone asks:

Piggyback: To use the punchline of someone else's joke to set up your own joke.

For people with a sense of humor, you all can sure be shallow! Why am I being lectured for playing off of John's sense of humor?


Tim


I think everyone was aware of your intention, Tim. The sad part is, however, that John's joke was a 'language' joke and your attempt to 'piggyback' on that joke miserably failed when you managed to misspell 2 out of 7 words in the one sentence that was your joke. That makes you look rather rediculous, and takes all the intended 'punch' out of your joke.

Also, please allow me to explain that a dictionary is not merely a tool used to discover the true meaning of a word, it is also a tool people sometimes use to find the correct spelling of the words they intend to use. I'm not even going to dissect your initial reply to me, but check it out and try not to blush.

Now, i'm sorry if my intent to help and possibly educate you has lead you to see no other option than to award me with 'respected foe' status, but that reaction could be seen as very explanitory RE: the source of your linguistic troubles.

Ciao,
Your RF



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 03:02 AM
link   
Ok this thread is titled “Questions for John Lear”. JL has already stated that he will not reply to Tim’s questions. Heck, he might even be on JL’s ignore list.

So can I ask you, Ghost01, why are you still posting in this thread? What are you intentions other than to smear JL?

I respect your knowledge of Area 51, but I have little respect for what you are doing here.

(please don't make me your foe also)



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 02:09 PM
link   
John: was the Lockheed L1011 Tristar the first "heavy" plane you flew?

[edit on 4/16/2007 by TheAvenger]



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01

Originally posted by TheAvenger
What John said was just an old play on words that some of us well..... older people have used for years. He was being humorous, which I really enjoy amongst all of this conspiracy stuff. Lighten up a little Tim.

[edit on 4/14/2007 by TheAvenger]


Thank you, I've very aware of that! I was Piggybacking on John's Joke, why doesn't anyone here get that?

And Before anyone asks:

Piggyback: To use the punchline of someone else's joke to set up your own joke.

For people with a sense of humor, you all can sure be shallow! Why am I being lectured for playing off of John's sense of humor?


Tim


My experience in observing your posts are that you use an innocent looking avatar with a kid in a wheelchair who nobody will want to hurt, meanwhile creating havoc and arguments all along the way. Or wait, maybe I am mixing you up with the guy named Lex.



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheAvenger
John: was the Lockheed L1011 Tristar the first "heavy" plane you flew?

[edit on 4/16/2007 by TheAvenger]



No, the first 'heavy' was the Boeing 707 water wagon for Air Club International in Seattle in 1973. We went to Honolulu from Seattle 4 or 5 times a week. This particular 707 was TWA's 5th airplane and ended up with us. It was the 'smoothest' flying airplane I ever flew until the Lockheed L-1011. By 'smooth' I mean the 'lightest' control touch to make a turn. It was a 'Cadillac' of an airplane.

We used to fly it all around the world but required 'water injection' for takeoff. Water injection increased the power substantially. But the water had to be carefully filtered so no dirt particles got into the injection system.
The water tank was 625 gallons and was located in the aft cargo compartment. We had rigged up a series of 'culligan' water tanks' in the cargo compartment to filter water we took on board from either a fire hydrant or water faucet. It usually took about 3 hours to make the 625 gallons required for takeoff. We had 10 or 15 types of connections from NPT to anything else to make sure we could connect to a local water source anywhere in the world.

We used to go through Sonderstrom, Greenland on our way back from Europe. One day we are having coffee up in the passenger lounge at Sonderstrom waiting for the water to filter and I look down at the airplane and see a flood of water coming out of the aft cargo compartment. We ran down to the a/c and one of the connections had broken and flooded all the passenger luggage and was then pouring out.

We fixed the connection, continued the the water fill and when we got to Seattle told the passengers that the baggage handlers in Germany had left their baggage out in the rain and we would give them a good talking to.



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Welcome back to the warzone John!

Just incase you missed my poor excuse for a question,ill post it again!

Is there a question you would have liked to have been asked on this thread,but so far havent been asked.And if so,what would that answer be?

I know its pretty ambiguous,but hay, at the moment its all i have!

Thanks for your time.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 54  55  56    58  59  60 >>

log in

join