It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Questions for John Lear

page: 53
39
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 1 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   
John, Astronaut Lisa Marie Nowak wearing a diaper was originally arrested on battery and attempted kidnapping charges and apprehended in Houston, TX. I have some questions hopefully you can answer.

Why was there a 3 month debriefing after her last July shuttle Mission that she was envolved with and is this normal proceedure for all shuttle missions?

Her new job after being fired from NASA is that of a curriculum development worker for the Chief of Naval training at Corpus Christi, Tx.

Is this a made up job title and is this a way to get her out of the limelight for further debriefing?

Who bailed her out?

Will she ever go to trial or will there be a plea bargain with probation to keep her out of jail?

How much behind the scenes negotiations do you think are going on with Nasa with authorities in Texas and Florida to keep her out of jail in the name of secrecy?

Would Nasa allow Lisa Marie Nowak to be imprisoned with all her secret knowledge? Rik Riley

[edit on 1-4-2007 by rikriley]




posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 05:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by rikriley
How much behind the scenes negotiations do you think are going on with Nasa with authorities in Texas and Florida to keep her out of jail in the name of secrecy?

Would Nasa allow Lisa Marie Nowak to be imprisoned with all her secret knowledge? Rik Riley
[edit on 1-4-2007 by rikriley]


Secret knowedge? Who said she worked with Anything secret?

Don't get me Wrong, NASA does have it's secrets, but nowhere near as much as people would like to think. NASA is mostly civil research, with a few DOD things in between. I have an uncle who works at Goddard Space Flight Center as an engineer.

Don't confuse NASA with NSA! NASA is mostly research!

Tim



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 11:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01
Secret knowedge? Who said she worked with Anything secret?

Don't get me Wrong, NASA does have it's secrets, but nowhere near as much as people would like to think. NASA is mostly civil research, with a few DOD things in between. I have an uncle who works at Goddard Space Flight Center as an engineer.

Don't confuse NASA with NSA! NASA is mostly research!

Tim



Concratulations on your spelling Tim, it makes you so much more believable.

The NSA is an integral part of NASA. In other words NSA is responsible for keeping secret what NASA actually does.

Most of NASA's research is secret. That it is a public organization and all information belongs to the public is a ruse and designed to mislead the public about NASA's acutal mission.

Gullible people have long bought into the 'NASA is a civilian organization' since NACA became NASA.

Please let us know exactly what your uncle told you. Also his name and job title would be helpful. Also if you could give me his immediate superiors name I could research that with the Goodard Space Center data base. Do you you think he would be able to give us a short statement on this thread? Thanks.



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 11:51 AM
link   
John,

if you've already been asked this, I'm sorry, or maybe you posted in another thread on the subject, I missed it.

What are you thoughts on the current situation with Iran and the Brits?

Do you think that the Brits will "go after" their sailors in a "resuce" attempt?

Do you see an attack on Iran by the Us?



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 12:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by elevatedone
John,
if you've already been asked this, I'm sorry, or maybe you posted in another thread on the subject, I missed it.
What are you thoughts on the current situation with Iran and the Brits?
Do you think that the Brits will "go after" their sailors in a "resuce" attempt?
Do you see an attack on Iran by the Us?





I believe that that the 'sailor' issue (probably provoked intentionally by the Brits) will be the first of 2 or 3 "outrages" which Bush will use as an excuse to nuke Iran. Maybe another might be 'an attack' on a US ship where the "Isaelis" will come in and 'save us' and oh, by the way, nuke Iran in the process.

I enjoy watching the charade although I won't like paying $10 a gallon at the pump after Iran is nuked.

I don't think the PTB would try another 911 here in the US when 70% of the people don't believe the scam of the last one. But you never know.

I think April will bring many surprises (how about that for a weasel type prediction?)



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 02:08 PM
link   
Johnlear you think Israel or the US will NUKE Iran? That isn't logical, and would get barely any support except from hardliners.



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Johnlear you think Israel or the US will NUKE Iran? That isn't logical, and would get barely any support except from hardliners.






My opinion is that 650 nukes were placed in strategic locations within and around key nuclear facilities inside Iran by US Special Ops teams within the past 18 months.

At some point in the future Iran will commit some kind of 'incident' that will provoke a US and Israeli attack on Iran.

The US will drop conventional bombs as will the Israelis. The nukes will be triggered by satellite and the US will be 'shocked and outraged' that the Israelis used nukes (supplied and detonated by the US) which the Israelis will admit to.

Israel will be sent to the doghouse with 50 billion dollars to ponder their outrage and attempt to reform.

Halliburton will move into Iran and with its long standing record of humanitarian aid will help with the rebuilding of that country and help with the fair and equal distribution of its oil.

The above is an opinion and only an opinion. Any resemblance to reality is strictly coincidental.



posted on Apr, 2 2007 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
Please let us know exactly what your uncle told you. Also his name and job title would be helpful. Also if you could give me his immediate superiors name I could research that with the Goodard Space Center data base. Do you you think he would be able to give us a short statement on this thread? Thanks.


NASA mainly does civilian research, although they do sometimes launch different military payloads such as larger sattelites.

My uncle is Bahi Rock. I don't know his current title, the last time I spoke with him, he was changing positions within NASA.

Tim



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 07:38 AM
link   
John, you use the figure of 650 nukes. Is this off the top of your head or do you have reliable info that satellite detination of the nukes in Iran may take place in 18 months? Are these small strategic nukes or are these in the high Mega ton range? Rik Riley



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 08:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by rikriley
John, you use the figure of 650 nukes. Is this off the top of your head or do you have reliable info that satellite detination of the nukes in Iran may take place in 18 months? Are these small strategic nukes or are these in the high Mega ton range? Rik Riley




650 is the number I was given as was the fact that they will be triggered by satellite. There are different sizes for different applications. Todays nukes are extremely small and efficient and supposedly very clean. Whatever that means. Of course all of this may be disinfo but I trust my sources.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 08:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

My opinion is that 650 nukes were placed in strategic locations within and around key nuclear facilities inside Iran by US Special Ops teams within the past 18 months.

At some point in the future Iran will commit some kind of 'incident' that will provoke a US and Israeli attack on Iran.

The US will drop conventional bombs as will the Israelis. The nukes will be triggered by satellite and the US will be 'shocked and outraged' that the Israelis used nukes (supplied and detonated by the US) which the Israelis will admit to.

Israel will be sent to the doghouse with 50 billion dollars to ponder their outrage and attempt to reform.

Halliburton will move into Iran and with its long standing record of humanitarian aid will help with the rebuilding of that country and help with the fair and equal distribution of its oil.

The above is an opinion and only an opinion. Any resemblance to reality is strictly coincidental.


Hi John,

Can I ask your opinion on why on earth Israel would go a long with a plan that will leave them devestated internationally/politcally speaking?

Vector J...



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vector J
Hi John,
Can I ask your opinion on why on earth Israel would go a long with a plan that will leave them devestated internationally/politcally speaking?
Vector J...






Go along? Go along? Are you kidding me? This is THEIR plan. It has been since 1947 to get the US to fight THEIR battles. They are the ones that want to create such havoc in Iraq that will force partition and thus weaken that country and effectively eliminate them as a threat. They are the ones that have 3 times in the past year tried to slip past American AWACS to nuke Iran. It is THEIR satellite launched last summer that will trigger the nukes.

THEY are the ones with their AIPAC lobby that have a stranglehold on the Senate, the House, Nancy Pelosi, President Bush, the Pentagon and most of American Industry.

Do you really think that we are fighting for Iraq's "Democracy". No, we are losing American lives, spending trillions of dollars and killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi men, women and children at Israels behest and direct order.

When 3 trillion dollars went missing at the Pentagon where do you think it went?

It is my opinion that Israel conceived, planned, engineered and carried out 911 from within the U.S. Government specifically to provoke the attack on their enemy Iraq. And, oh, by the way, get rid of OBL in Afghanistan who was burning down the poppy fields, the commerce of which so many of the world banks depend. Oh yes, need to nuke Iran also.

Go along? Yes, there are many who think we are dragging poor little innocent Israel into the middle east chamber of horrors. You would be surprised at who really arms the Iraqis. Very surprised.

Thanks for the question Vector J. I have been meaning to get around to this.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:10 PM
link   
That was one of the most point blank interesting posts I have seen from you John Lear, not that all your others aren't interesting, I just didn't know you were so well informed politically.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by rikriley
John, you use the figure of 650 nukes. Is this off the top of your head or do you have reliable info that satellite detination of the nukes in Iran may take place in 18 months? Are these small strategic nukes or are these in the high Mega ton range? Rik Riley




650 is the number I was given as was the fact that they will be triggered by satellite. There are different sizes for different applications. Todays nukes are extremely small and efficient and supposedly very clean. Whatever that means. Of course all of this may be disinfo but I trust my sources.


First off I am blown away that you are now a Middle East specialist. I applaud this, though I must wonder.

1st. We don't "nuke" people anymore..

2nd If we DID "nuke" someone, the fall out, no matter how small, big or what have you, will go with the wind and be picked up by other nations..

3rd It is illogical to say we will "nuke" someone for the sake of "nuking" and honestly shows the level of intellectual thought you put into your post there friend.. conventional bombs are much more efficient.

4th I see nothing in your past that says you have "sources" and considering the length of your retirement now, I doubt you have "close" anything in any branch of US service. Your "source" is **EDITED as to not hurt your feelings** and your knowledge of Middle Eastern affairs and politics is ... **EDITED as to not hurt your feelings**

650 nukes huh?


Personally, I think you should stick to talking about anal probing greys from Uranus, reptilians from nuherianabababaloon the 54th planet from the sun who control man kind through telepathic communication from the hollow lunar moon base.


Nah, not done, still angry.

What the hell are you doing giving people advice on world affairs who HONESTLY LOOK UP TO YOU.

HAVE YOU NO SHAME????

You know squat about Israeli history, Israeli American relations, apparently squat about American policy nor anything about the war for that matter.

"loosing American lives" "Killing hundreds of thousands of people" "spending "trillions" of dollars"

Come off it man,


Thanks for the question Vector J. I have been meaning to get around to this.


Seriously, stick to aliens and reptilians are all that crap, don't go spreading ignorant fear mongering out to people.



[edit on 4/3/2007 by Rockpuck]

[edit on 4/3/2007 by Rockpuck]



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rockpuck

Seriously, stick to aliens and reptilians are all that crap, don't go spreading ignorant fear mongering out to people.



Thanks for the post Rockpuck. What you lack in substance you make up in sincerity.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:45 PM
link   
I can assure you **EDITED as to not hurt your feelings** that I know far more when it comes to Middle Eastern history, as many **EDITED as to not hurt your feelings**

You seriously have a flawed logic, which would be perfectly FINE if people did not look up to you and take every piece of **EDITED as to not hurt your feelings** from your mouth every time you speak as gospel.

Every one is entitled to their opinions, but you are a special case, you are using your little claim of fame to press your views on others with the claims of "sources" which in my opinion is NO DIFFERENT then a hoax! .. Why the staff lets you continue with this masquerade is beyond me, but you have abused your position here, you have crossed the line.

Does lieing to people on ATS really get you off that much? That you think you can sit there unquestioned because when you first came here people listened to you?


You can be as famous as you want man, fame means little to me, on ATS your an equal, if you cannot bring factual proof to the table, you little stories are nothing more then BS.


[edit on 4/3/2007 by Rockpuck]



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Puckboy,

care to share your opinion on the situation or are you happy bitchin on John?

My opinion? America will start war based on nothing AGAIN, America will screw up AGAIN and the rest of the world will have to clean up after America AGAIN while they whinge about the losses of troops AGAIN.

But..thats just me.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by shadow fax
Puckboy,

care to share your opinion on the situation or are you happy bitchin on John?

My opinion? America will start war based on nothing AGAIN, America will screw up AGAIN and the rest of the world will have to clean up after America AGAIN while they whinge about the losses of troops AGAIN.

But..thats just me.


Faxgirl

No, I will not share my opinion on this topic, I am rather content right now on talking to mr. Lear here. I have posted my thoughts on far better threads.. you know.. them kinds a threads where real intellectual conversations take place? Not here.

This is not PTS either by the way, Faxgirl.



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 01:05 PM
link   
Ok guys /gals,

Please tone it down a bit and keep it nice,

Im sure you all can get an opinion over rather that tit for tat,

Thanks

Asala

Feel free to u2u me,



posted on Apr, 3 2007 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rockpuck

Originally posted by shadow fax
Puckboy,

care to share your opinion on the situation or are you happy bitchin on John?

My opinion? America will start war based on nothing AGAIN, America will screw up AGAIN and the rest of the world will have to clean up after America AGAIN while they whinge about the losses of troops AGAIN.

But..thats just me.


Faxgirl

No, I will not share my opinion on this topic, I am rather content right now on talking to mr. Lear here. I have posted my thoughts on far better threads.. you know.. them kinds a threads where real intellectual conversations take place? Not here.

This is not PTS either by the way, Faxgirl.


you're funny



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join