It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Questions for John Lear

page: 44
39
<< 41  42  43    45  46  47 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 08:44 AM
link   
Thanks John for answering my questions. Since we at this time can not go to the Moon by conventional means I have an alternative. Check your u2u and see what you think about my proposal about Project Moon Beam. Rik Riley

[edit on 15-2-2007 by rikriley]




posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 09:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by IntoTheVoid
My question to you is: In your opinion, how much of what NASA releases has been edited in some way? And more importantly why, and what are they hiding?


Most of NASA pictures of the moon and the planets have been edited. They are hiding the existence of extraterrestrials on our moon, on the planets and in our solar system. I don't know whether or not the extraterrestrials themselves are behind this cover-up.


A good example is a pic called LICK001-full.Gif, a whole shot of the moon. It appears to have been touched up in several areas of space surrounding the moon.


Yes it was touched up in several areas. This photo is one that was sent to me anonymously from NASA several years ago.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by moderndayHanSolo
i now understand the soul stuff, and possibly the soul catcher on the moon, i would like to ask you if the president george bush is an illumananti or a reptile or wtf?seems like something is screwed up.


Yes. something is certainly screwed up. The main question for me is why are we still in Iraq? When we invaded Iraq, at the behest and direction of the Israelis, it was to create enough havoc to warrant partition. The reason for the partition is to reduce Iraqs threat as a united country against Israel.

OK. So now isn't there enough of an excuse for partition? Lets get on with it.


i like your thoughts on 9/11, they seem correct, as do your thoughts on the planets.


9/11 was perpetrated for 3 reasons, all equally important. The first was to have an excuse to get into Afghanistan and get the illegal drugs flowing that Osama bin Landen had stopped. Whether or not you belive that OBL was trying to hold the drugs for a better price or whether he was really trying to eradicte the drugs is immaterial. The fact is that the drugs were not flowing and it was bad for business.

The second was an excuse to go into Iraq and create enough terror and havoc that partition would be the only solution. This would limits Iraqs ability to threaten Israel as a country.

The third reason was to limit the rights of the American people and effectively turn the United State of America into a police state. And the reason for this was to facilitate the emergence of the North American Union. The PTB didn't want any 'rah, rah, sis boom bah' for the good 'ol U.S.A. In reality the U.S.A. does not exist anymore as a country. Its now merely a facade waiting for an official name which is the North American Union.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Thanks for replying


Originally posted by johnlear
Yes it was touched up in several areas. This photo is one that was sent to me anonymously from NASA several years ago.


Would I be right in assuming that the moon has several artificial satelites then?



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by IntoTheVoid
Thanks for replying


Originally posted by johnlear
Yes it was touched up in several areas. This photo is one that was sent to me anonymously from NASA several years ago.


Would I be right in assuming that the moon has several artificial satelites then?



If you mean to include satellite/spacecraft that do not necessarily 'orbit' but do occupy space above the moon, of course. But I would guess that there are more than 'several'.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 01:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by moderndayHanSolo
i now understand the soul stuff, and possibly the soul catcher on the moon, i would like to ask you if the president george bush is an illumananti or a reptile or wtf?seems like something is screwed up.


Yes. something is certainly screwed up. The main question for me is why are we still in Iraq? When we invaded Iraq, at the behest and direction of the Israelis, it was to create enough havoc to warrant partition. The reason for the partition is to reduce Iraqs threat as a united country against Israel.

OK. So now isn't there enough of an excuse for partition? Lets get on with it.


i like your thoughts on 9/11, they seem correct, as do your thoughts on the planets.


9/11 was perpetrated for 3 reasons, all equally important. The first was to have an excuse to get into Afghanistan and get the illegal drugs flowing that Osama bin Landen had stopped. Whether or not you belive that OBL was trying to hold the drugs for a better price or whether he was really trying to eradicte the drugs is immaterial. The fact is that the drugs were not flowing and it was bad for business.

The second was an excuse to go into Iraq and create enough terror and havoc that partition would be the only solution. This would limits Iraqs ability to threaten Israel as a country.

The third reason was to limit the rights of the American people and effectively turn the United State of America into a police state. And the reason for this was to facilitate the emergence of the North American Union. The PTB didn't want any 'rah, rah, sis boom bah' for the good 'ol U.S.A. In reality the U.S.A. does not exist anymore as a country. Its now merely a facade waiting for an official name which is the North American Union.




Mr. Lear,

I agree with your assessment of the reasons for 911. Do you agree that the gov. will, in the near future, perpetrate another major event here in America (terrorist attack), even more cataclysmic, to heigten it's agenda here. The event I had in mind would facilitate the arrival of the American Union and justify a war with Iran! I am thinking that the gov. will plant a suitcase nuke in a major US city and leave clues that lead to Iran.

I would like to hear your thoughts on this if you have the time.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 01:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by BugZy
I agree with your assessment of the reasons for 911. Do you agree that the gov. will, in the near future, perpetrate another major event here in America (terrorist attack), even more cataclysmic, to heigten it's agenda here. The event I had in mind would facilitate the arrival of the American Union and justify a war with Iran! I am thinking that the gov. will plant a suitcase nuke in a major US city and leave clues that lead to Iran.

I would like to hear your thoughts on this if you have the time.



Yes, I believe something like that will happen in March or April. We intend to stay in Iraq with further occupation of the middle east.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 01:52 PM
link   
John,

Have you heard of COM-12, the Committee of Twelve to Save the World? The one Commander X talks about in his video. Do you know if it really exists?

Are the Nordics our friends?



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 08:01 PM
link   
John,

Not sure if this has been suggested before but this is my take.

You say that the Earth's moon was towed into place. As none of the scientists can explain logically why our moon is where it is ( ie there is no reason for it to be there) I can offer this theory.

THE MOON WAS PUT THERE BY ET TO BLOCK THE KILLSHOT BY OUR SUN.

You know that the moon has large amounts of glass on its surface. Glass needs tremendous heat to produce it. I am suggesting that our moon has blocked previous solar flares that would have toasted us.

Yes I know that it would have to be in exactly the right place at exactly the right time but then our ET friends are very clever. James Gilliland has said something on similar lines - that ET has positioned HUGE craft between Earth and Sun to prevent solar flares boiling our water planet.

Regards to you John - you are doing a wonderful job.

PS still waiting for a comment regarding Gassendi crater and its obvious base.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 09:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Icarus Rising
John,

Have you heard of COM-12, the Committee of Twelve to Save the World?


Yes.


The one Commander X talks about in his video. Do you know if it really exists?


I don't know. I think Bill Cooper originally suggested that one.


Are the Nordics our friends?


I don't know.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 09:57 PM
link   
John,

Thanks a million for being available and willing to answer these questions. It must get old after a while going over and over the same things. There are so few knowledgeable people available to discuss "fringe" topics like this, I hope you know what an incredible asset you are to the human race.

The thing is, these "fringe" topics are going to be the ones that end up defining our existence and its continuity. No one seems to get that. Its just all exciting and mysterious and different. Most people, I think, get caught up in the fascination with the unknown, the drama of it, never realizing that fascination in itself is born of the intrinsicity of the subject matter to our very existence.

I am very curious about COM-12 and the Nordics because, deep down, I feel they may be our way out of this mess. Notwithstanding the second coming of Christ Himself, of course.

What do you make of Admiral Byrd and his post-WWII expeditions to the poles, particularly the information attributed to his diaries? What happened to his Antarctica Expedition, were they attacked by Nazis using alien technolgy? Did he make contact with Nordics in the Arctic?



posted on Feb, 16 2007 @ 12:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Icarus Rising

John,

What do you make of Admiral Byrd and his post-WWII expeditions to the poles, particularly the information attributed to his diaries? What happened to his Antarctica Expedition, were they attacked by Nazis using alien technolgy? Did he make contact with Nordics in the Arctic?


Take a look at this site:

www.thelivingmoon.com...



posted on Feb, 16 2007 @ 09:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
You mean you've declared yourself the winner of our debate and I didn't even get to present my argument?


I never declared myself "winner", I just gave up speaking to a wall.


That seems hardly fair. Can't you just let me at least present my side before you win?


Ok, what the heck. I know I shouldn't do this, but anyway ...

You asked me to "pick" a "neutral point". This shows that you didn't understand my argumentation that there is no single "neutral point" (or "neutral distance from the moon") in the Earth-Moon system.

The ~24,000 mile figure based on the "static" model is meaningless, because Earth and Moon are not static. So we only consider the actual dynamic system.

For a straight-line Earth-Moon trajectory, the "neutral point" would be the L1 Lagrangian at ~38,000 miles from the moon's center. However, most spacecraft (and specifically, the Apollo ones) didn't follow a straight-line trajectory. The best approximation for "neutral points" on such general trajectories can be obtained when one looks at the "effective" gravitational potential of the system (see

www.physics.montana.edu... ,

image "A contour plot of the effective potential". It's not to scale!).

This is the effective gravity potential of the system in a frame of reference which rotates around the larger body with the angular velocity of the smaller one. That's the frame of reference, where Earth-Moon trajectories are normally plotted and calculated, because Earth and Moon are fixed in this frame of reference.

Now, any small 3rd body (e.g. a spacecraft) placed at a point in this potential will follow a path
- towards lower potentials (into the "gravity well")
- perpendicular to the lines of equal potential.
This results in an area around the Moon (which one my call "sphere of influence" ("s.o.i."), although it's not a geometrical sphere), from which a spacecraft, if starting from zero velocity, will eventually impact on the Moon. I've tried to mark the border of this area very roughly with a dashed red line on the potential plot:

Climk here for image

This is far from exact, but you can see that coming from the "side" towards the moon and not on the Earth-Moon line, the border of the "s.o.i." tends to be further away from lunar surface than L1. On the Moon's orbit itself, the border extends to the L4 and L5 points!

That said, for realistic spacecraft trajectories the border to the "s.o.i." (which is the only physically meaningful definition of "neutral point" for such trajectories) will be passed at a distance greater than the L1 distance of 38,000 miles. A value of ~43,000 miles for Apollo trajectories doesn't sound unrealistic.

The above discussion doesn't take into account Coriolis forces (the spacecraft is moving with v > 0 along all its trajectory), but the general idea (that the border of the "s.o.i." is further away than L1 on points off the direct line) remains valid.

Summary:
1) For a straight-line trajectory, the "neutral point" (as measured by a spacecraft) is at L1, ~38,000 miles from the moon's center. This value is smaller than the "43,495 miles" quote attributed to v. Braun, but not too far off. Even if (and that's purely hypothetical!!) v. Braun referred to L1 with his quote, any "conspiracy theorists" should still claim a lunar surface gravity of "only" ~23% of Earth and not 65%.
2) For realistic trajectories, the border of the lunar "sphere of influence" is further away from the center of the Moon than L1. A detailed analysis will probably show that v. Braun's figure of ~43,500 miles is right in the ballpark.

So, that was my argument. Now you!

And BTW: The failures of early moon probes can be entirely attributed to inexact and unreliable rocket engines and guidance systems.

Regards
yf



posted on Feb, 16 2007 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Thanks for the link.

I have a theory about ozone depletion at the south pole, as well. I think maybe ozone is being used as a fuel component by the Antarctic UFO fleet. Pretty far-fetched I know, but what do you think?



posted on Feb, 16 2007 @ 01:02 PM
link   
John Lear,

Where does Osama bin Laden fit in to the 9/11 events? I can understand the conspiracy talk, but i cant figure out what he did or didnt do in the attack? Is he part of the conspiracy?



posted on Feb, 16 2007 @ 07:45 PM
link   
the bin ladens and the powerful men and women of our country are close, family friends



posted on Feb, 17 2007 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Mr. Lear,

Sorry if you have answered this before.

Years ago, I would say in the mid 90's, as a new type of satellite was going up, I remember hearing that the new tracking technology was going to "make the seas transparent." I think that was the quote.

Anyway, here are the questions:

1. Is there such a mechanism in place now?
2. Are there any kind of hi-res images, scans, etc. of the ocean floor?
3. Have there ever been any anomalous formations found in any images or scans taken of the ocean floor?

Thank you sir.



posted on Feb, 18 2007 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by biotic
the bin ladens and the powerful men and women of our country are close, family friends


ok, ill give you that, but which one or all of them are reptiles, illuminati, etc? who is controlling it?

how can we stop them/fight back?


[edit on 18-2-2007 by moderndayHanSolo]



posted on Feb, 18 2007 @ 01:41 AM
link   
Couple of questions:
Do Animals have souls?

When we die, should be go towards the light or not?

And three:
What was your favourite AIRLINER to fly?



posted on Feb, 18 2007 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

9/11 was perpetrated for 3 reasons, all equally important. The first was to have an excuse to get into Afghanistan and get the illegal drugs flowing that Osama bin Landen had stopped. Whether or not you belive that OBL was trying to hold the drugs for a better price or whether he was really trying to eradicte the drugs is immaterial. The fact is that the drugs were not flowing and it was bad for business.

The second was an excuse to go into Iraq and create enough terror and havoc that partition would be the only solution. This would limits Iraqs ability to threaten Israel as a country.

The third reason was to limit the rights of the American people and effectively turn the United State of America into a police state. And the reason for this was to facilitate the emergence of the North American Union. The PTB didn't want any 'rah, rah, sis boom bah' for the good 'ol U.S.A. In reality the U.S.A. does not exist anymore as a country. Its now merely a facade waiting for an official name which is the North American Union.



I have a few questions:

1. If this is true then who made the decision for this?

2. Was it Bush??? (I could almost see him doing it too, he's a cocky you know what)

3. What about what I saw on TV that day?? It certaintly looked liked planes to me, and I have heard stated on this site that it was bombs.

4. What did they do with all the people on the planes?

5. Why did Bin Laden confess to doing it??

6. Do you think Bin Laden is alive??



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 41  42  43    45  46  47 >>

log in

join