Originally posted by johnlear
I believe he worked at S-4.

John,
After listening to so many people talk about "inside" information and yourself included it would safe to assume 1 of 2 possibilities....

1. They all have some truths and as with humans there is always some form of embellishment or misunderstanding of what is going on not discounting the disinfo agents.

2. This whole subject is bogus and there is plenty of money to be made out of gullibles ( Like myself ) or a chance to stand out from the crowd with incredible claims and seem important.

I have personally swayed between both for 20+ years and guess unless something pretty significant happens I will continue to do so.

Mr Lear,

Can you please get back with me about the Plant 42 tape. In short, could you tell me what was so scary about it? Thank you.

Mr. Lear,

Thank you again for your repies to my last questions, I've got a million for you though....lol! Please let me know if you feel that I am trying to monopolize your time here, because that is not my intent. I would merely like to get some answers to questions that have puzzled me for years!

My first question is one you may or may not be able to answer, so anyone here who knows for sure is welcome to participate.

1. The Transistor is probably one of the most significant, if not the most significant invention in the history of electronics. To me it seemed to come out of nowhere, and I was wondering if you feel that the transistor is a by product of our technology exchange program with alien cultures.

To me it would seem that the transistor would be a great starting point for human evolution in electronics knowledge.

To rephrase: Is the transistor a result of man's ingenuity alone or is it a result alien technology exchange.

We all know that the transistor gave rise to solid state electronics and the elimination of the bulky tube technology that was utilized prior to 1947.

Thank you in advance Mr. Lear for any help you can give me

Sincerely,

BugZy!

Hello Mr. Lear, I've read much of what you've said about a great many things and have have found you to be a remarkable person.
My question is in regards to a man named Gordon Novel, may I ask your opinion of him and the statements he made in his recent interview.
Does he speak truths? Can he be trusted? ThankYou for your thoughts on this and all else you've already commented on. Be well.
T

John,

Thank you for making yourself available to answer questions. I've watched and heard you interviewed several times and read a lot of letters and statements you've released over the past 20 years at least, concerning UFOs and aliens. I'm sure I haven't caught everything you've posted on this site, much less that's been made public over the past several decades, which brings me to my question.

Rather than ask you to comment individually on dozens of people, stories, etc., that you've been involved with over the years regarding these topics, I will phrase my question much more simply.

What, if anything, have you changed your mind about and why?

In other words, what position or belief have you previously stated publicly but now feel differently? I'm not looking for minor, trivial things like "I once thought the 'little greys' were 3 feet tall on average, but I think they are closer to '4 feet'". Silly example, I know.

I'm looking for something like "I used to back so-and-so but now I know he's a fraud". Or, "I used to believe that the US government has made treaties with aliens, but I no longer believe that". I'm certainly not suggesting that that is the case, but merely using that for an example.

Anyway, if there's any major thing or things that stand out as far as previously held positions that you no longer hold, I would greatly appreciate you relating what they are.

Thanks in advance.

Mr Lear,

All the evidence I can glean points towards an impending cosmic event in 2012 that could have far reaching consequences for mother Earth ( watch Brent Millers The Horizon Project DVD) Do you consider that area 51 is where the illuminati are preparing to save their own necks by developing intergalactic ships and leaving the rest of us to go whistle ?

Also Gordon Novel mentions you in his recent interview with Project Camelot (you can view it on Google Video) and says he really p****d John Lear off by not going to look at area 51 with yourself and Bob Lazar. Is this true ? This guy Novel, like yourself seems to want to improve things for the many not just the few by developing free energy and anti gravity machines. He wants to contact ETs and mentions Dan Burisch. Could you help ?

[edit on 3-2-2007 by pippadee]

Originally posted by pippadee
Mr Lear,

All the evidence I can glean points towards an impending cosmic event in 2012 that could have far reaching consequences for mother Earth ( watch Brent Millers The Horizon Project DVD) Do you consider that area 51 is where the illuminati are preparing to save their own necks by developing intergalactic ships and leaving the rest of us to go whistle ?

I don't know. I predict that 2012 will be no big deal. (Most of my predictions have proven wrong.)

Also Gordon Novel mentions you in his recent interview with Project Camelot (you can view it on Google Video) and says he really p****d John Lear off by not going to look at area 51 with yourself and Bob Lazar. Is this true ? This guy Novel, like yourself seems to want to improve things for the many not just the few by developing free energy and anti gravity machines. He wants to contact ETs and mentions Dan Burisch. Could you help ?

I don't remember Gordon refusing to go to Area 51 with Bob and I. I could be wrong. Gordon just wants to improve things for the many like all of us do. Unfortunately Gordon (and I) don't have the means or access to the means to accomplish this. We know who has it. But there is no way we can get it.

Everybody would like to contact ET.

As I mentioned in another thread, the only thing I believe for sure is that Dan Burisch worked at S-4 as a microbiologist. And no, I can't prove it.

John, curious what info you had on the Minnesota Blackbird incident?

I saw in the dulce thread that you had updated info here but I don't see anything. Being a member in that area I'd like to hear anything interesting going on there.

I am guessing you're referring to the old restored A-12 that they want to take out and put on the front lawn.

Originally posted by HaTaX
John, curious what info you had on the Minnesota Blackbird incident? I am guessing you're referring to the old restored A-12 that they want to take out and put on the front lawn.

The Minnesota Air National Guard A-12 Blackbird (CIA) was legally hijacked by the Administrator of the National Museum of the Air Force, Gen. Metcalf, for his buddy Michael Hayden, (Director CIA) so that the CIA could stick it on a pole at their gate for their 60th Anniverary in May. The MANG has had the airplane for 17 years and put thousands of dollars and thousands of man hours into restoring it. Metcalf could have taken one of the three A-12's in Alabama, all of which operational histories which the MANG Blackbird did not. This hijack took place with the full knowledge and co-operation of Michael Wynne (Sec. Air Force). These are some thoughts I wrote to a few people who are trying to stop this hijack:

To all:

Gen. Metcalf has a history of being unreasonable. After 36 years in the service he feels like he can do pretty much anything he wants. I imagine that he wants to ingratiate himself to Gen. Hayden (Director, CIA) for whatever reason. I don’t believe Hayden knows the extent of the political firestorm Metcalf has created for him and my reasoning is this: those guys (Metcalf, Wynne (Secretary of the Air Force), Hayden) are so wrapped up in their jobs they don’t have the faintest, foggiest idea what is going on in the ‘real’ world. They have never had to account to any ‘lower echelon’ civilian for anything. All their problems are solved through deputies and what they want they get.

None of the 3 realizes what's going on here. They don’t understand that the press is not going to sympathize with them. They don’t realize that the 60th Anniversary of the CIA is going to turn into a media nightmare for all three of them. The only thing the press will be interested in is how three Air Force Generals hijacked the A-12 Blackbird from the Minnesota Air National Guard. Metcalf doesn’t realize that its payback time for all the people he has sc****** since he took over (i.e. The Memphis Belle, the Dallas/Ft. Worth B-36 for starters). He doesn’t realize that this is not the Air Force where all he has to do is say a quiet word to a deputy and the problem is over. This is the real world.

My opinion is that long careers are going to be tarnished on this one and it will end up a huge black eye for the National Museum of the Air Force and there are going to be some people that are going to be pretty po'd off over that. There is going to be an enormous bloodletting but in the end it will be better, in the long run, for the U.S. Air Force (who will learn a valuable lesson in public relations) and the Air Force Museum who will revise their procedures of acquisitions, and the CIA, who will take a little more care about how they accept ‘gifts’ and under what conditions they accept them.

John Lear

Originally posted by Southcoast
Ever hear of this story?
America'a Apollo 11 lunar module photographed a human skeleton on the moon when it landed there in 1969.That's the blockbuster claim of Chinese astrophysicist Dr. Kang Mao-pang, who first stunned the world when he released pictures of bare human footprints on the moon at a news conference in Beijing last winter.

I didn't hear of this until now but it makes sense. There are million of people who live on the moon who look just like us. They are much more advanced. Most of their activity is on the far side but a lot can still be seen on the near side. Many farside photos when enlarged show buildings, structures, towers, giant tubes, areas of strip mining, huge equipment etc.

NASA didn't try very hard to hide this stuff in farside photos because they could never have imagined or predicted that 35 year from then (1970), people would be scanning those photos and carefully looking at them with photo imaging equipment not even conceived in the late 60's.

But its there for all to see.

I imagine that 20 or 30 years from now school teachers will be telling their students: "Imagine, 30 years ago, people believed that the moon had no atmosphere. They were told it was a vacuum. You wonder how uninformed people could have been in those days when there were many pictures of clouds and fog on the moon. There was even a picture of a huge explosion to the northwest of Endymion that clearly showed dust and debris rising in a column to the top of the atmosphere. One famous and respected moon researcher even called that column of dust an 'artifact'."

Hi John,
What is your opinion of these 1993 'genuine' pictures by Italian Filiberto Caponi?