It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Questions for John Lear

page: 40
39
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 29 2007 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
I believe he worked at S-4.


John,
After listening to so many people talk about "inside" information and yourself included it would safe to assume 1 of 2 possibilities....

1. They all have some truths and as with humans there is always some form of embellishment or misunderstanding of what is going on not discounting the disinfo agents.

2. This whole subject is bogus and there is plenty of money to be made out of gullibles ( Like myself ) or a chance to stand out from the crowd with incredible claims and seem important.

I have personally swayed between both for 20+ years and guess unless something pretty significant happens I will continue to do so.




posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 01:09 PM
link   
Mr Lear,

Can you please get back with me about the Plant 42 tape. In short, could you tell me what was so scary about it? Thank you.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 09:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

2) Another question I have is: Does NASA control the huge Earth based telescopes scattered throughout the world? If not, would'nt these astronomers spill the beans about life, atmospheres, and the true geography of the planets?


If its not NASA, someone is controlling who uses and what is viewed through huge Earth based telescopes. If somebody reading this disagrees with what I have said and, in fact, has access to a huge earth based telescope these are the areas I want a photo of on the moon:



This is an excellent question - and goes back to the previous question I asked Mr. Lear which went unanswered. Is it true that you've stated NASA has "touched-up" certain photos? I identified the particular photos Mr. Lear made that claim about in my post a couple of pages back.

But this question posed here is a good one. NASA can not control all of the earth-based telescopes run by astronomers around the world:

Endymion
Photo of Endymion

de la Rue

Photo of de l Rue crater


Mare Crisium
Photo of Mare Crisium from Montreal

Aristarchus

Photo of Aristarchus


Ukert

Photo of Ukert (Nasa photo)


Bullialdus
Photo of Bullialdus taken from Italy

Mosting A

Photo of Mosting A (Nasa)


Kepler

Photo of Kepler and many very high-quality and stunning photos of lunar landscape...



These were just a few very quick searches...I'm sure observatories around the world have similar images as these, if not even much higher quality and quantity.

-Ry


[edit on 30-1-2007 by rdube02]

[edit on 30-1-2007 by rdube02]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by rdube02
But this question posed here is a good one. NASA can not control all of the earth-based telescopes run by astronomers around the world:


Thanks for an incredible amount of work rdube02. Unfortunately all of the photos you have posted have been airbrushed or tampered with in some manner. If NASA itself doesn't control the large telescopes, someone else does.

You know your photo of Aristarchus?

Here is what is really looks like:



Beautiful, huh? I think its a nuclear fission reactor. Notice the blue color? Thats how radiation looks when it comes in contact with molecules of air.

Anyway thanks for all of your hard work.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 10:09 AM
link   
Mr. Lear,

Thank you again for your repies to my last questions, I've got a million for you though....lol! Please let me know if you feel that I am trying to monopolize your time here, because that is not my intent. I would merely like to get some answers to questions that have puzzled me for years!

My first question is one you may or may not be able to answer, so anyone here who knows for sure is welcome to participate.

1. The Transistor is probably one of the most significant, if not the most significant invention in the history of electronics. To me it seemed to come out of nowhere, and I was wondering if you feel that the transistor is a by product of our technology exchange program with alien cultures.

To me it would seem that the transistor would be a great starting point for human evolution in electronics knowledge.

To rephrase: Is the transistor a result of man's ingenuity alone or is it a result alien technology exchange.

We all know that the transistor gave rise to solid state electronics and the elimination of the bulky tube technology that was utilized prior to 1947.

Thank you in advance Mr. Lear for any help you can give me

Sincerely,

BugZy!



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 07:30 PM
link   
Mr. Lear,

It is an honor to speak with you and I have been in awe and a bit shocked by your information. I am not aware if you have discussed this before and I could not find it in any other thread. What is your knowledge of what went on with Admiral Byrd and Operation High Jump in Dec. of 1946?

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

Did the Nazis escape with high level officers of the SS to Neu-Schwabenland and all their UFO technology? Why did the fleet comeback in such a hurry appearing to have suffered heavy casualties?
Once again thank you and it is an honor.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 08:02 PM
link   
Hi john I just joined ATS today mostly due to your high regard of this forum. I am riveted to every one of your interviews on C2C especially the last one. I am so happy you changed your mind and now feel the public does deserve to know about the greatest kept secret for over 50 years. Three years ago I made a revelation which I published on the web on the streamlink forum and amazon.com and no one took notice. The revelation which I allude to in my opinion dwarfs the UFO situation and was revealed on last mondays C2C AM boardcast by brent millers Horizon Project (THP). You see I came to the same conclusion THP has but a year earlier. I wish to ask you if you know through your contacts about preparations the USA government is taking because of what is about to happen in about 5 years. You see our solar system will be the closest to the galactic plain (actually closest to the black hole in the middle of the Milkey Way per se) in the year 2012 which is when the ELE will take place. See my first post below for links to what I am talking about:


Originally posted by DennisHoyer
Hi everyone I just joined ATS today BECAUSE of this show on C2C that you guys are talking about in this thread. You see I came out with a theory about the end of the world happening on or about 2012 that I posted both on streamlink's coast riders forum (postings still exist there) and on amazon.com see coast.premiereinteractive.com... and www.amazon.com...=cm_sylt_byauthor_title_full_1 respectily for the posts. That was three years ago ok? Then suddenly monday night I hear brent miller talk about my theory (ie the solar system going throught the galactic plain causing an ELE or catastrophe) from the Horizon Project (started 2 years ago according to brent miller in the interview) which I noticed Ed dames was marketing on his RV website. I believe there are no coincidences and I do believe Ed Dames came in contact with my theory that I published on the web, most likely on C2C streamlink forum and ran with it. I do not mind him trying to make money off of my theory I proposed as I stated so in the second link above, but a little credit like I gave the authors of books that led me to this theory would be nice. Now I could be wrong and maybe it was one of the scientists involved with the horizon project but I doubt it. If anyone has any questions about my theory I will be happy to answer any after you read at least one of the 2 links above.


THP C2CAM interview about the facts are intentionally unclear to get people to buy ed dames dvd but my second link to amazon.com above is very clear. Now that the theory I proposed 3 years ago on the web has been verified by THP scientists, what is your opinion on this revelation I stumbled on over 3 years ago?

[edit on 31-1-2007 by DennisHoyer]

[edit on 31-1-2007 by DennisHoyer]



posted on Feb, 2 2007 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Hello Mr. Lear, I've read much of what you've said about a great many things and have have found you to be a remarkable person.
My question is in regards to a man named Gordon Novel, may I ask your opinion of him and the statements he made in his recent interview.
Does he speak truths? Can he be trusted? ThankYou for your thoughts on this and all else you've already commented on. Be well.
T



posted on Feb, 2 2007 @ 06:44 PM
link   
LOL, John, I think just this thread alone, that yeilds the questions it does gives you a full time job just trying to answer every question here. If you don't mind I'd like to ask every one who reads this thread to listen to C2C AM this thursday night to a Lawrence E. Joseph who will be interviewed by George Noory discussing the end of the world in 2012. Just reading what the subject of conversation is on C2C on that night 2/8/2007 ie, about the sun and solar cycles, Mr joseph, has read Patrick Geryl 2 books on 2012 in my opinion and has bought his conclusions (which is an author of two of the five books I talk about in the first sentence found here:

www.amazon.com...=cm_sylt_byauthor_title_full_1 )

and has more to say about this authors conclusions about 2012 being the End of the world. Patrick Geryls two books are located here:

www.amazon.com...

What I am trying to say is that there is an avalance of people coming forward now to try to warn the world what is going to happen in 2012. All the governments know this and have been preparing for years. I feel the USA government has wasted its money investing in vast amounts of money in underground cities because in 2012, the black hole of the Milkey way otherwise known as the central sun of the galaxey, will rock terra firma so violently that the usa has only invested in very expensive tombs for all the foolish politicians and billionaries. Mr Mccanney, I can say after reading his posts religiosly for the last 3 years will agree with me on this.

Everyone who can read this post please tune into C2C this thrusday 2/8/2007 for a riveting show.

[edit on 2-2-2007 by DennisHoyer]

[edit on 2-2-2007 by DennisHoyer]

[edit on 2-2-2007 by DennisHoyer]

[edit on 2-2-2007 by DennisHoyer]



posted on Feb, 2 2007 @ 06:59 PM
link   
Hello Dennis, did you happen to see this? I'd be interested in your thoughts.
yowusa.com...

www.geocities.com...
T

[edit on 2-2-2007 by termination shock]

[edit on 2-2-2007 by termination shock]

[edit on 2-2-2007 by termination shock]



posted on Feb, 2 2007 @ 09:45 PM
link   
Dennis,

You should read Sleeper's Thread here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This gives alot of information that John & Sleeper (who John thinks is for real) thinks about all of that stuff.

If I were you I would just read through John & Sleepers posts they always quote people, b/c there has been alot of bs on it and it's about 75 pages long.



[edit on 2-2-2007 by i_want_to_believe]



posted on Feb, 3 2007 @ 01:49 AM
link   
John,

Thank you for making yourself available to answer questions. I've watched and heard you interviewed several times and read a lot of letters and statements you've released over the past 20 years at least, concerning UFOs and aliens. I'm sure I haven't caught everything you've posted on this site, much less that's been made public over the past several decades, which brings me to my question.

Rather than ask you to comment individually on dozens of people, stories, etc., that you've been involved with over the years regarding these topics, I will phrase my question much more simply.

What, if anything, have you changed your mind about and why?

In other words, what position or belief have you previously stated publicly but now feel differently? I'm not looking for minor, trivial things like "I once thought the 'little greys' were 3 feet tall on average, but I think they are closer to '4 feet'". Silly example, I know.

I'm looking for something like "I used to back so-and-so but now I know he's a fraud". Or, "I used to believe that the US government has made treaties with aliens, but I no longer believe that". I'm certainly not suggesting that that is the case, but merely using that for an example.

Anyway, if there's any major thing or things that stand out as far as previously held positions that you no longer hold, I would greatly appreciate you relating what they are.

Thanks in advance.



posted on Feb, 3 2007 @ 06:40 AM
link   
Mr Lear,

All the evidence I can glean points towards an impending cosmic event in 2012 that could have far reaching consequences for mother Earth ( watch Brent Millers The Horizon Project DVD) Do you consider that area 51 is where the illuminati are preparing to save their own necks by developing intergalactic ships and leaving the rest of us to go whistle ?

Also Gordon Novel mentions you in his recent interview with Project Camelot (you can view it on Google Video) and says he really p****d John Lear off by not going to look at area 51 with yourself and Bob Lazar. Is this true ? This guy Novel, like yourself seems to want to improve things for the many not just the few by developing free energy and anti gravity machines. He wants to contact ETs and mentions Dan Burisch. Could you help ?

[edit on 3-2-2007 by pippadee]



posted on Feb, 3 2007 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by termination shock
Hello Dennis, did you happen to see this? I'd be interested in your thoughts.
yowusa.com...

www.geocities.com...



Marshall Masters is claiming Planet X is due to visit earth in 2012. He may be onto something. You see I believe Zacaria Sitchin's account of the Annunaki. I do believe the annunaki is the god in the old testiment judging by his temperment for blood. I further believe their planet, Niburu ie planet X, May be an elaborate space craft that they pilot themselves, like the moon probably is (the moon was either towed into orbit, or it pilioted itself into its orbit around the earth perhaps it too being an elaborabe space craft since it rings hollow). You see the event that will happed in 2012 is the grand daddy event of ALL cycles and happens every 30 million years, 8 times a galactic revolution of the solar system around the central sun. The annanuki will either want to avoid this time period or definitely want to view earth when this happens.

I love einstien.



Originally posted by i_want_to_believe
Dennis,

You should read Sleeper's Thread here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This gives alot of information that John & Sleeper (who John thinks is for real) thinks about all of that stuff.

If I were you I would just read through John & Sleepers posts they always quote people, b/c there has been alot of bs on it and it's about 75 pages long.



Thank you for the link I'll try to read it.



posted on Feb, 3 2007 @ 11:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by pippadee
Mr Lear,

All the evidence I can glean points towards an impending cosmic event in 2012 that could have far reaching consequences for mother Earth ( watch Brent Millers The Horizon Project DVD) Do you consider that area 51 is where the illuminati are preparing to save their own necks by developing intergalactic ships and leaving the rest of us to go whistle ?


I don't know. I predict that 2012 will be no big deal. (Most of my predictions have proven wrong.)


Also Gordon Novel mentions you in his recent interview with Project Camelot (you can view it on Google Video) and says he really p****d John Lear off by not going to look at area 51 with yourself and Bob Lazar. Is this true ? This guy Novel, like yourself seems to want to improve things for the many not just the few by developing free energy and anti gravity machines. He wants to contact ETs and mentions Dan Burisch. Could you help ?


I don't remember Gordon refusing to go to Area 51 with Bob and I. I could be wrong. Gordon just wants to improve things for the many like all of us do. Unfortunately Gordon (and I) don't have the means or access to the means to accomplish this. We know who has it. But there is no way we can get it.

Everybody would like to contact ET.

As I mentioned in another thread, the only thing I believe for sure is that Dan Burisch worked at S-4 as a microbiologist. And no, I can't prove it.



posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 03:05 AM
link   
John, curious what info you had on the Minnesota Blackbird incident?

I saw in the dulce thread that you had updated info here but I don't see anything. Being a member in that area I'd like to hear anything interesting going on there.

I am guessing you're referring to the old restored A-12 that they want to take out and put on the front lawn.



posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 10:31 AM
link   
Ever hear of this story?
America'a Apollo 11 lunar module photographed a human skeleton on the moon when it landed there in 1969.That's the blockbuster claim of Chinese astrophysicist Dr. Kang Mao-pang, who first stunned the world when he released pictures of bare human footprints on the moon at a news conference in Beijing last winter.
"The Americans have conspired in a cover-up of monumental and possibly even criminal proportions," Dr. Kang told newsmen in Beijing.
"They hid photos of bare human footprints on the moon for 20 years and managed to keep the human skeleton secret even longer. The implications of what they found up there are staggering," he continued. "But the Americans apparently feel that nobody else in the world is privileged enough to share the information."
The question that must be answered is how the footprints and skeleton go to the moon. The obvious implication is that extraterrestrial lifeforms were involved but we'll never know unless the Americans release the information they have."
www.think-aboutit.com...



posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 11:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by HaTaX
John, curious what info you had on the Minnesota Blackbird incident? I am guessing you're referring to the old restored A-12 that they want to take out and put on the front lawn.


The Minnesota Air National Guard A-12 Blackbird (CIA) was legally hijacked by the Administrator of the National Museum of the Air Force, Gen. Metcalf, for his buddy Michael Hayden, (Director CIA) so that the CIA could stick it on a pole at their gate for their 60th Anniverary in May. The MANG has had the airplane for 17 years and put thousands of dollars and thousands of man hours into restoring it. Metcalf could have taken one of the three A-12's in Alabama, all of which operational histories which the MANG Blackbird did not. This hijack took place with the full knowledge and co-operation of Michael Wynne (Sec. Air Force). These are some thoughts I wrote to a few people who are trying to stop this hijack:

To all:

Gen. Metcalf has a history of being unreasonable. After 36 years in the service he feels like he can do pretty much anything he wants. I imagine that he wants to ingratiate himself to Gen. Hayden (Director, CIA) for whatever reason. I don’t believe Hayden knows the extent of the political firestorm Metcalf has created for him and my reasoning is this: those guys (Metcalf, Wynne (Secretary of the Air Force), Hayden) are so wrapped up in their jobs they don’t have the faintest, foggiest idea what is going on in the ‘real’ world. They have never had to account to any ‘lower echelon’ civilian for anything. All their problems are solved through deputies and what they want they get.

None of the 3 realizes what's going on here. They don’t understand that the press is not going to sympathize with them. They don’t realize that the 60th Anniversary of the CIA is going to turn into a media nightmare for all three of them. The only thing the press will be interested in is how three Air Force Generals hijacked the A-12 Blackbird from the Minnesota Air National Guard. Metcalf doesn’t realize that its payback time for all the people he has sc****** since he took over (i.e. The Memphis Belle, the Dallas/Ft. Worth B-36 for starters). He doesn’t realize that this is not the Air Force where all he has to do is say a quiet word to a deputy and the problem is over. This is the real world.

My opinion is that long careers are going to be tarnished on this one and it will end up a huge black eye for the National Museum of the Air Force and there are going to be some people that are going to be pretty po'd off over that. There is going to be an enormous bloodletting but in the end it will be better, in the long run, for the U.S. Air Force (who will learn a valuable lesson in public relations) and the Air Force Museum who will revise their procedures of acquisitions, and the CIA, who will take a little more care about how they accept ‘gifts’ and under what conditions they accept them.

John Lear



posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Southcoast
Ever hear of this story?
America'a Apollo 11 lunar module photographed a human skeleton on the moon when it landed there in 1969.That's the blockbuster claim of Chinese astrophysicist Dr. Kang Mao-pang, who first stunned the world when he released pictures of bare human footprints on the moon at a news conference in Beijing last winter.



I didn't hear of this until now but it makes sense. There are million of people who live on the moon who look just like us. They are much more advanced. Most of their activity is on the far side but a lot can still be seen on the near side. Many farside photos when enlarged show buildings, structures, towers, giant tubes, areas of strip mining, huge equipment etc.

NASA didn't try very hard to hide this stuff in farside photos because they could never have imagined or predicted that 35 year from then (1970), people would be scanning those photos and carefully looking at them with photo imaging equipment not even conceived in the late 60's.

But its there for all to see.

I imagine that 20 or 30 years from now school teachers will be telling their students: "Imagine, 30 years ago, people believed that the moon had no atmosphere. They were told it was a vacuum. You wonder how uninformed people could have been in those days when there were many pictures of clouds and fog on the moon. There was even a picture of a huge explosion to the northwest of Endymion that clearly showed dust and debris rising in a column to the top of the atmosphere. One famous and respected moon researcher even called that column of dust an 'artifact'."



posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 08:51 PM
link   
Hi John,
What is your opinion of these 1993 'genuine' pictures by Italian Filiberto Caponi?






new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join