It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by semperfortis
Here ya go.
From the NY times that you all seem to love so much.
Oh please... quotes without source articles?
Bad things happening at Abu Ghraib? Death tolls from the Iran/Iraq war?? Death tolls from the GULF WAR??? Child mortality numbers caused by SANCTIONS IMPOSED???
WHERE are the "millions" of Iraqi's killed by Saddam Hussein?
Originally posted by semperfortis
If you have a problem with the NY times, not my problem. Yet here I will help, take your mouse, click on the google icon, type in NY times and them look for death tolls from Saddam.
Get you right there.
Semper
Originally posted by semperfortis
I guess I'm not proper.
Semper
Originally posted by semperfortis
When was the last time a US President killed 300K of his own people?
Originally posted by semperfortis
Oh YE of little faith.
www.frontpagemag.com...
It really is just the third option on google.
"sigh"
Semper
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by semperfortis
Oh YE of little faith.
www.frontpagemag.com...
It really is just the third option on google.
"sigh"
Semper
You know I was just going to let it go because you're having a bad day and we're supposed to feel sorry for you. But... that isn't even the article you quoted.
Is this an example of the "passion, principles and honor" that we're supposed to be proud of?
Originally posted by ceci2006
You can also add, grover, Mr. Bush's revenge for Saddam Hussein trying to assassinate the elder Bush too.
If America was so concerned about "saving the little children" and building schools, they would have helped Sudan stop the genocidal war.
Originally posted by ceci2006
But as far as I'm concerned, I've feel that the U.S. government believes oil is more important than lives. That is why the U.S. mostly protected the areas of the oil repositories and not the civilians at all.
Originally posted by ceci2006
...................
He disregards the Geneva Convention.
..................
Originally posted by ceci2006
And until recently (2004), he used immunity so that any U.S. Soldiers would not be prosecuted for war crimes in the ICC.
Originally posted by ceci2006
People who express dissent are arrested or carted away to "Free Speech Zones".
Originally posted by ceci2006
Not to mention the arrest of a filmmaker in Iraq by the U.S. military. This director was sent to a detainee camp indefinitely until he fought the government to get out. Now he's suing Rumsfeld for violating the Geneva Convention.
Originally posted by ceci2006
When do we draw the line with our own leader--if we are so concerned with the likes of other leaders from other countries who brutally do the same thing to their people?
Originally posted by ceci2006
............
This war has been badly mismanaged on shady reasons from the start. However, for people who support the war, they forget that Mr. Bush changed his reasons for going over there many times since the war started.
Originally posted by ceci2006
However, we disagree on the validity of these new weapons being connected to WMD's. I also submit that this story about WMD's is also indicative of a war of misinformation to keep people distracted from real issues until the November elections.
Originally posted by ceci2006
...............
But my question about comparing Mr. Bush and Mr. Saddam is very much pertinent in this idea of why the war was fought. Mr. Bush has done some of the same brutal things as other dictators around the world. However, his way of doing it is "sanitized" before the public and therefore not taken as extremely as it would in other places.
Originally posted by grover
people most certianly have been arrested for having the termity of protesting within sight of the president and also to say that international laws and conventions should not apply to U.S. soldiers is bullhooey muaddib and you know it. the only way there can be any form of international law is for it to apply to all, including us.