Bang goes another mysterious story

Better to know what it is than live the illusion that there was something "out there"

It does seem that the few who knew the truth - see the pic and the answer at the bottom, deliberatly cropped the explanation off it to make it seem "suspicious".

I wonder how long this fraud will be comitted for ...

If they looked around the "antenna" and found no evidence of a craft anywhere near, then the mystery would have been solved.Or they could have just yanked the "antenna" off and found that it squishy.

Sad how scientists nowadays don't use the scientific process anymore.

Ahhh but there is the problem. The scientists DID know what it was, someone just cropped the explanation off the bottom of the pic and then spread the story it was an antenna.

It was fraud...

i know this is an old thread but i did a search for Eltanin and this thread came up. dont want to get told off for not using the search function

the senior marine biologist on board the Eltanin at the time Dr Thomas Hopkins, said that it couldnt be a plant, he said no-one on board has ever heard about it before.
it was two geologists who identified it as a plant, Heezen and Hollister as i vaguely recall. could be wrong.
An underwater acoustics researcher Tom DeMary contacted an oceanographer named A.F. Amos, and it was Amos who referred DeMary to Heezen and Hollister (or something like that).

A search for A.F. Amos found an oceanographer named Anthony F. Amos.

Search also came up with AF AMOS - Air Force Maui Optical Station, whose mission is to research and develop new and evolving electro-optical sensors (whatever that means).

Just wondering .... could there be some confusion as to which A.F. Amos was contacted? Is there a chance that it was Air Force AMOS that DeMary contacted and not the oceanographer?
Would it make sense to contact the air force if it was known that it was an antennae they found down there and not a plant? A senior marine biologist said it couldnt be a plant.
Also wondering ... how would geologists know it was a plant if a marine biologist said it couldnt be?
just asking thats all.

does anyone know if this 'antennae' thing is still there?
there is only one picture of it i can find and to me it looks too rigid to be a plant.
bruce cathie says his world grid meets up at this antennae (he says it's an antennae) and that according to his harmonic calculations there is another one in siberia.

i just recently began reading more about the eltanin antennae and learned that Eltanin is a dying star in the constellation of Draco, and there is an impact crater called the eltanin impact. Was the uss eltanin built and named eltanin because its job was to search for the eltanin crater? i have read they found impact debris but no crater and that this is unusual. if true what would be the reason for there being no crater?

i apologise for my post being scrappy but i have to be at work soon and in a hurry.
i would be interested in anyone else's thoughts on this subject, i'm very much an amateur at this research lark and not very good at it either, but i know there are people on ats who are.