
Originally posted by goldengrainTHere can, for most of us, be no proof given of James' tale. In such a case those who believe totally
with no evidence may be called gullible, but those who totally reject such claims can be seen as close-minded with limited vision.
People who accept without proof are gullible. Those who reject because of lack of proof
I would suggest that the most gullible person of all is Casbolt himself.
I KNOW he never worked for any of the Secret services.
He makes up the most unbelievable scenarios based on things he has read. Its also quite easy to see where he gets his ideas from if one looks closely
at his website.
He has posted at least 4 known hoaxes on his website if one counts the Lord Marduk rubbish.
Did he create those hoaxes if he did then it is sad.
Did he post them without doing very very simple checks to confirm the validity of what he was posting on his website, because if he did then that
practically destroys any validity that he may, and I say may, have had.
I would go along with what has already been posted. He and Gridkeeper are chancers, they have seen the money that has been made by chancers in the US
and want to do the same thing here and its failed miserably.
|