It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ufos photo?

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2006 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Gemwolf, Please tell me where I made any sort of namecalling. I mearly saw pics of stars and stated my opinion... simple as that.




posted on Aug, 10 2006 @ 01:00 PM
link   
If I am not mistaken, but in the late 40's, early 50's, a cluster was seen over the white house like what you photographed.



posted on Aug, 10 2006 @ 01:20 PM
link   
On another topic. does anybody remember the thread on the guy and his buddies who kept waking up in the morning (west coast) and seing some huge ufo the size of a city? he had supposed video of it and it was being checked out? i never found a follow up on it. anyone recall this? sorry to post here, i search but can't find the original thread.



posted on Aug, 10 2006 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by reaganero
On another topic. does anybody remember the thread on the guy and his buddies who kept waking up in the morning (west coast) and seing some huge ufo the size of a city? he had supposed video of it and it was being checked out? i never found a follow up on it. anyone recall this? sorry to post here, i search but can't find the original thread.


Yes I remember it. The guy lives like 30 miles from me in Pittsburg, Ca. and is no doubt 3 beers short of a six pack since he seems to be the only one seeing this. I call BS!



posted on Aug, 11 2006 @ 01:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by bramski
Judging by the position of the object (hand?) obscuring the sunlight from the camera lense, it looks as though you have inadvertently used a photography technique called "Solar Obliteration"

You can read more about it here - www.scire.com...



today i used solar obliteration out of at least ten pics i got this
i54.photobucket.com...
im thinking that the other photo has nothing to do with solar obliteration though i could be wrong




posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 10:26 AM
link   
I see 11 UFOs and one dark one.
Do stars even show up on a photo?
No they don't. That is why the photo is unusual.

Try to photograph a star.
You need a long exposure at night with a tripod.

OK so what is it? Its VERY bright, thats what it is.
See YouTube channel MikeHawkins where analyst says a very
bright light source will make a video camera movie appear to blink.

Anything like star plasma roaming around the outside of a ship might do it.
Tesla designed it, bankers stole it and we're stuck with it.



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 10:38 AM
link   
Cyrax - is the date straight up or set right on the photo? And no addresses but where do you live, generally?

I forgot to ask what was the temperature when you took the photo?

[edit on 5-12-2007 by Lost_Mind]



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Good catch UMBRAX,

Whether or not they are of the 'alien' variety, they are Unidentified Flying Objects.

People seem to take the phrase out of context more often than not unfortunately, thus the banter.



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 12:12 PM
link   
Here is the report filed.

Yeah sure stars in photographs all the time but NOT ON THE MOON!!!
(Dis info campaign launch ASAP... fleet in Australia is nothing at all)

National UFO Reporting Center

18. on Clusty search for monty4444

ED: Oh aliens again, Tesla couldn't make plasma sparks in the atmosphere
with 10-100 million vac coils. I think so. But does plasma fly?
Ask Bush to tap his scientific experts. I heard his wife owns some Tesla patents. Someone has been hosed Big Time.




[edit on 12/5/2007 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 12:18 PM
link   
I think they are stars - JMO. I live in Alaska...and stars can be seen during the day - esp in winter!

Very cool picture nonetheless!

Wish I could capture something



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 12:29 PM
link   
I see a big beautiful fluffy blue sky and I wish I was a bird so I could fly fly fly



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Stars in photographs are a problem.
Some how they are just not bright enough.

Sure we see stars but the Sun wiped them all out for the astronauts and
cameras on the moon.



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


What do you mean? Are you saying we cant see stars during the day and cant film them?

I dont understand what you wrote. Sorry



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 01:00 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Unless the location is very clear, at night, a time exposure is needed for photos.

Venus might be a daytime star but usually at sundown and some times with
Mercury.

These objects must be bright to show up at regular photo exposures.



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


I see! Well here in Alaska.....the stars appear so bright and so close...its like you could reach out and touch them! SEriously! Amazing!!!



posted on Dec, 5 2007 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 





I think they are stars - JMO. I live in Alaska...and stars can be seen during the day - esp in winter!


That fleet photo was in summer, down in Sydney, Australia.
You might want to compare relative distance to the poles.

It sounds like he did not see any stars until the photos and didn't
think stars would be developed.

Well the quantity of photographic sightings that ensued places a lot
of UFO activity in that location at that time.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join