It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by skyeagle409
Project Mogul balloon flight # 4 was cancelled due to clouds and only a simple service flight with a single sono buoy was launched, not the Mogul balloon train # 4 that Charles Moore claimed was made up similar as Mogul balloon train # 2.
Hey skyeagle409,
I agree with you.
Charles S. Shneider , MOGUL Project Manager, had been told less than two weeks before the Alamogordo trip on May 20th 1947 by the CAA that MOGUL trains had to be launched in Cloudless Skies. And that NOTAM's (Notice to Airmen) were to be issued.
Dr. Crary's daily Journal clearly states that June 3 Balloon Flight was "abandoned due to cloudy skies" and then again on June 4 that "No Balloon flight again on account of Clouds". Those two entries clearly refer to MOGUL Balloon train flights.
When they do actually launch a MOGUL Balloon Train it is documented clearly in Dr. Crary's Journal. " June 5 Thurs. Up at 4 to shoot 2 charges for balloon flight. Whole assembly of constant-altitude balloons set up at 0500."
Also the Air Force Report cites MOGUL Progress report 6 , sect. II , p. 5 as the basis for the configuration of the supposed MOGUL flights # 3 and # 4 , when it is actually a description of MOGUL Flight # 5 ( the first MOGUL flight at Alamogordo ) as it describes the Radiosonde/Ballast configuration Flight # 5 used.
Originally posted by nightwing
Anybody care to take a whack at how the military could have LEGALLY accomplished a
real "alien" recovery in 1947 at Roswell, and to at least have had a crack at keeping it secret for a while ? Hint, it is in Posse Comitatus, which resulted from the US Civil War aftermath.
"That even explains why Col. Blanchard would be able to go on leave at the time he did , as he wouldn't have been in charge. " == lost shaman
Wow. You lost me there. There is no way I read that to even make sense. You must have left something out.
Big Grin ! I presume this is a reference to Chris Roth's "ultraterrestrial hypothesis" from the Martians-Go-Home newsletter ?
If this were allowed to violate Posse Comitatus during wartime, explain why the FBI had total authority over "FuGo" crashes within the US.
members.aol.com...
This point is brought out in two other FBI memos, one dated July 24 (E. G. Fitch to D. M. Ladd), the other late on July 7. In the former the writer refers to Hoover's note in the first paragraph and then goes on to say that the military has promised complete cooperation in the future and that "all discs recovered be made available for examination by FBI agents," thus clearly implying that this had not been the case up to then.
The July 7 memo, also to Ladd, gives further evidence of the lack of FBI access to the prank disc. The Army took sole charge.
Originally posted by nightwing
"That is not correct. The military knew nothing of any crash on the Foster ranch until a civilian notified them. Proof that object that crashed there had nothing to do with the military." == skyeagle409
It is more referenced and backed up than refuting replies so far. You state it is incorrect because "your assumption" is "proof" it is not military. Assumptions are not "proof" of anything. In this case, even if your assumption is correct, it does not prove lack of ownership on any party. Even "spring-heeled jack" could not leap that far.['quote]
If the military knew nothing of any crash on the Foster ranch, then what crashed there had nothing to do with the miilitary. If the military loses a stealth fighter, it will definitely know that it is missing. In the case of the Roswell incident, the military knew nothing so logic would simply state that the object was not that, of a military project.
"I want to also emphasized that the Air Force would never have taken a civiilan, in this case, Rancher, "Mac" Brazel, into custody for a week over the recovery of a Mogul balloon train." == skyeagle409
Nor any other civilian for ANY reason. Posse Comitatus applies here. If Mack (correct spelling)
Correction, it is not spelled "Mack" he was referred to as "Mac." I had it right the first time.
...went to the base, he was invited and NOT in custody, lest the military have a law suit on their hands they cannot win. Not to mention the Emminent Domain law suits they were already in over the taking of private lands to form White Sands Missile Range. The really absurd thing about the Roswell story is just how incompetent the military apparently acted, DESPITE the FACT that there were LEGAL means to actually DO all the things that Roswell proponents claim the military accomplished, all of which would have been Congressional level complaints and illegal.
Let's see what the facts are.
____________________________________________________________________
Roswell Incident: Mac Brazel
"Before EITHER of the July 8th or July 9th "news" articles were published in the Daily Record it was known Brazel, who basically lived in a ramshackle ranch house eight miles from his nearest neighbor and had no telephone, electricity or running water, was picked up from his ranch and taken to the house of the owner of the local Roswell radio station, KGFL, to be interviewed. A wire recording of the interview was made, but because KGFL had signed off for the day the station planned to broadcast it the next morning."
"Before it could be used Brazel was taken into custody by members of the military police and his exclusive interview confiscated. The Federal Communications Commission (reported to have been through the office of T.J. Slowie, secretary of the Commission, but never admitted to by himself or confirmed by the Commission) warned station personnel that the matter involved national security and should KGFL air any portion of his interview, or issue any information regarding it, they would lose their broadcasting license.
"Sometime later Brazel showed up at KGFL escorted by military officers, where he then told the "truth" about the debris found on his ranch. Brazel refuted his initial story, claiming now, after being taken into custody and while STILL under custody, that he first found the debris MID-JUNE, 1947 and NOT on the morning of Saturday, July 5, 1947, and that it was simply a weather balloon."
The military took Mac Brazel into custody for about a week, during which time he was seen on the streets of Roswell with a military escort. His behavior aroused the curiosity of friends when he passed them without any sign of recognition. Following this period of detention, Brazel repudiated his initial story."
www.qsl.net...
____________________________________________________________________
[edit on 20-7-2006 by skyeagle409]
After all, the military convinced the public for 47 years that a weather balloon was involved in the Roswell incident and then admitted in 1994 that it wasn't a weather balloon that was involved in the Roswell incident and to further add, the military convinced the public that the Roswell aliens people saw in 1947 were accident victims and test dummies of the 1950's.
Originally posted by longhaircowboy
After all, the military convinced the public for 47 years that a weather balloon was involved in the Roswell incident and then admitted in 1994 that it wasn't a weather balloon that was involved in the Roswell incident and to further add, the military convinced the public that the Roswell aliens people saw in 1947 were accident victims and test dummies of the 1950's.
The military never convinced me that it was a weather balloon. I've read and reread all the testimony involved and nothing leads me to the conclusion that it was anything other than what was described.
Originally posted by nightwing
Anybody care to take a whack at how the military could have LEGALLY accomplished a
real "alien" recovery in 1947 at Roswell, and to at least have had a crack at keeping it secret for a while ? Hint, it is in Posse Comitatus, which resulted from the US Civil War aftermath.
Originally posted by Access Denied
Ironically, the same official documents that the proponents of Roswell use as “proof” of their theories also indicate that no extraterrestrial craft or bodies had been recovered.
What Did the Air Force Really Know?
WANTED: One flying saucer in operable condition. No questions asked. Contact USAF.
General Nathan F. Twining described this in SECRET letter from the Air Material Command (Wright-Patterson AFB where the saucer supposedly went for analysis) that was dated September 23, 1947 (less than three months after Roswell). The subject of this letter was, "AMC Opinion Concerning Flying Saucers". In this memo, Twining concluded that, "The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious". However, he does goes on to say, "There is a possibility that some of the incidents may be caused by natural phenomena, such as meteors". Does Twining mention any recently recovered crashed discs? He states clearly toward the end of the memo that consideration must be given that, "THE LACK OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IN THE SHAPE OF A CRASH RECOVERED EXHIBITS which would undeniably prove the existence of these objects". Does this sound like a man who had in his possession an actual crashed saucer? It is also interesting to note that the letter never states that the objects are suspected to be from outer space. All the authors quote this document as an indication that flying saucers were real. However, in The Roswell Incident, UFO Crash at Roswell, and Crash at Corona, all the authors omit the section concerning the lack of crashed exhibits! Talk about your cover-ups! This is a purposeful omission on the part of the authors to only tell one version of the story. They prey on the gullibility of the reader not to investigate further.
Because many people saw and felt the first nuclear explosion at
Trinity site in July, 1945, the base commander issued a press
release saying that an ammunition dump had blown up, but
fortunately nobody was injured.. It was a total lie.
I have the clippings. Sometimes it was necessary to lie for
national security interests. The government initially lied about
Gary Powers U-2 flight.. blown off course by the wind.. until
Khruschev provided the plane, pilot, and camera.
Let us not be naive.
STF
www.virtuallystrange.net...
Originally posted by Hal9000
Here is a good point Access Denied brought up in the first post, and so far no one has challenged it in this thread.
Access Denied said:
Ironically, the same official documents that the proponents of Roswell use as “proof” of their theories also indicate that no extraterrestrial craft or bodies had been recovered.
What Did the Air Force Really Know?
WANTED: One flying saucer in operable condition. No questions asked. Contact USAF.
General Nathan F. Twining described this in SECRET letter from the Air Material Command (Wright-Patterson AFB where the saucer supposedly went for analysis) that was dated September 23, 1947 (less than three months after Roswell). The subject of this letter was, "AMC Opinion Concerning Flying Saucers". In this memo, Twining concluded that, "The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious". However, he does goes on to say, "There is a possibility that some of the incidents may be caused by natural phenomena, such as meteors". Does Twining mention any recently recovered crashed discs? He states clearly toward the end of the memo that consideration must be given that, "THE LACK OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IN THE SHAPE OF A CRASH RECOVERED EXHIBITS which would undeniably prove the existence of these objects". Does this sound like a man who had in his possession an actual crashed saucer? It is also interesting to note that the letter never states that the objects are suspected to be from outer space. All the authors quote this document as an indication that flying saucers were real. However, in The Roswell Incident, UFO Crash at Roswell, and Crash at Corona, all the authors omit the section concerning the lack of crashed exhibits! Talk about your cover-ups! This is a purposeful omission on the part of the authors to only tell one version of the story. They prey on the gullibility of the reader not to investigate further.
Originally posted by Access Denied
Right, in fact Moore said the reason #5 didn't use RAWIN targets was precisely because of their inability to track #4 on RADAR which was only their 3rd flight in NM.
nightwing said : To make a Case for Roswell, hear-say won't cut it. To go beyond that
and actually Prove something, then Testimony won't cut it.
I’ll take your word for it
Originally posted by Access Denied
There’s at least two reasons I can think of right away why your theory doesn’t work:
1. The only two people who claim to have read a copy of Project Sign’s TOP SECRET “Estimate of The Situation” said nothing about a recovery either.
2. Considerable effort was made after this to shoot one down and no effort to conceal this fact from the public was made. How soon we forget history.
That’s because according to Ruppelt when it reached Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg he rejected it and ordered it declassified and all copies of it (with the possible exception of one I hear) burned. I guess it pissed him off… some people have no sense of hunor
In 1946, when Vandenberg was Director of the Central Intelligence Group (the CIA's predecessor), he had sent Gen. Doolittle to Europe to look into the so-called Scandanavian "ghost rocket" situation, the first major post-war UFO incident. Exactly what Doolittle might have learned and reported back to Vandenberg has never been disclosed. However, Gen. David Sarnoff (founder and President of RCA), who accompanied Doolittle, was later quoted as saying the objects were "real missiles."
Originally posted by nightwing
"I find that to be irrelevant to the Roswell events." == lost shaman
Again I am surprised. Its all from the same data set. I think you been up
too late. You need sleep. (Smile)
Originally posted by Access Denied
Originally posted by lost_shaman
It is irrelevant , with respect to highly classified information not being included in lesser classified documents , if they tried to shoot UFOs down and the public knew about it.
It’s absolutely relevant to your belief that a crashed UFO was recovered in 1947 and it was classified TOP SECRET. If that’s the case then why would they be trying so hard to shoot down UFOs after 1947?
Originally posted by nightwing
"You may wish to consider the words of Jesse Marcel Jr......" == longhaircowboy
And this thread as well
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Welcome to the formation. I see you figured out what I meant. Next is skyeagle. This thread is rapidlybecoming a good reference piece for me, and hopefully others. Show where the opinions come from.
Perspective AND context. That is the formation if you are a researcher and willing to share.
Wanna see a picture of his Gravestone, skyeagle ? This is a fact. Tangible, it exists, you can photo it etc...
Its a "data" point. Mack, not Mac. Sorry to dissappoint.
www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk...[/qoute]
We can go here to see "Mac" as well.
WILLIAM BRAZEL JR.
(Mac Brazel's adult son in 1947; returned to ranch while father was incarcerated by military and found some scraps of debris left behind after military cleanup):
(F&B) "[There were also] some wooden-like particles like balsa wood in weight, but a bit darker in color and much harder.... It was pliable but wouldn't break. Weighed nothing, but you couldn't scratch it with your fingernail. All I had was a few small bits. [There was no writing or markings on the pieces I had] but Dad did say one time that there were what he called "figures on some of the pieces he found. He often referred to the petroglyphs the ancient Indians drew on the rocks around here as "figures," too, and I think that's what he meant to compare them with."
Translation, forget facts, lets all continue to fantasize, and indulge in retrospective falsification. I am not slamming you skyeagle. You seem to be knowledgable
enough about the topic to provide more than just selected second-hand quotes.
Yes indeed! Not only do I have direct contacts within the Air Force, where much of my information came from, but I have been of service to the Air Force for almost 40 years and was once part of a government cover-up so I am well-aware how government cover-ups are concocted.
To make a Case for Roswell, hear-say won't cut it. To go beyond that
and actually Prove something, then Testimony won't cut it. The folks that are beginning to seriously engage in here, both pro and con, are collectively
yielding new ideas about Roswell. So take the chip off your shoulder, grab an oar and pull with us. RAM speed !
Actually, I don't have an "ax to grind" but I am here to put forth UFO reality for what it is. I became an UFO researcher about 12 years after my own UFO sighting over Phan Rang airbase, Vietnam in 1968. That incident was covered up and never revealed to the public. Since then, I have uncovered facts and data from the Air Force proving that no Project Mogul balloon train #4, which the Air Force attributed to the Roswell incident in its 1994 Roswell report, never flown and was actually cancelled due to weather and that, according the NYU's Project Mogul flight data records and that is why you will never find any flight data records on the internet or otherwise as pertaining to Project Mogul flight #4 because that flight never took place but the Air Force managed to pull its false story through anyway.
The bottom line is, I know much more about UFO reality than I have reavealed on this message board.
[edit on 21-7-2006 by skyeagle409]
Originally posted by Access Denied
Common sense should tell you after reading these that the evidence is clear no craft had been recovered….. there were still debating whether or not the phenomena was even real!