Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The best facial recognition software is the human brain.
No it's not. The best facial recognition hardware is the computer. They can tell differences between nearly identical faces where humans can not.
I'm not sure what you mean by the coveruppies comment BTW.
And have you looked at Osama, then at the man in the video?
I once did, he does look a bit different but the quality of all those clips are lousy.
With so many flaws, different perspectives and colorings I don't know what to make of it. I would rather have had that al-queda invested in some good
cameras than that second hand ebay crap they apparently are using now.
What I'm saying is, if there can't be a consensus of eyewitness accounts, then we can't rely on those acounts. We have to look at the
evidence, and so far I've seen none..
That's is rather peculiar reasoning, 9/11 conspiracy theorists used eyewitness accounts to their advantage whenever it suits them, even if there are
opposing witnesses. There isn't a single piece of evidence that you can't find another expert for with a different opinion but that doesn't mean
all those statements and opinions should be ignored.
Yes there is, I've seen it and collected it after burning it myself. I said it was found with molten steel. Steel can't melt at the temperatures
that supposedly brought dwn the building, so the thermite is the only reasonable explaination. give me a better one and maybe I'll change my
I don't think we are on one line here. Burned thermite is aluminiumoxide and iron. Since there was melten aluminium and iron in any case because of
the hot temperatures, how do you know what you collected?
So, you're saying that after they crashed into the towers, there was no swaying? well there was, and it was a lot less than the swaying that
high winds can do.
Ehm no im not saying that there was no swaying. Im saying that it was not the swaying that took the towers down but an unholy combination of infernal
temperatures, the shock of impact, and the weight of the collapsed regions on the already weakened lower structures.
they were security cameras. I doubt anyone reviewed them before they were confiscated, what with all the explosions and sirens and all.
My appologies! I had not realized that they where security cameras. I can see why it makes you suspicious, and I find it odd too, but if they prepared
for such an attack, and are so good at faking evidence, why didn't they give fake footage to the public?
Black boxes have survived much greater impacts. Tat's wht they were designed to do.
But this NOT the first time a black box does NOT
Yep. Would war be waged over 10 deaths? Would Haliburton have such a contract if it were only a few casualties?
If there was a terrorist attack that failed at the last moment, it would have been enough. Even one plane could have done. I mean, it's not like the
american government asked anyone for permission? They ignored pretty much everyones opinion. They could even have faked polls, why would it be
necessary to make such a dramatically overstatement?