President says New York Times is disgaceful, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-6-2006 @ 09:40 PM by Ahabstar
Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Peaceful Assembly, Freedom of Worship and Freedom to Petition the Government are all protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. No one on this board will debate that nor should anyone debate these freedoms. But at what point does responsibility come into account?

It is irresponsible and quite illegal to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there is no fire. Is your free speech infringed?

Should the Klu Klux Klan “peacefully” assemble before a burning cross in Harlem?

Should a Satanic cult freely practice a human sacrifice on the steps of the National Cathedral in DC?

Should have Al Gore shot George W. and the Supreme Court Justices because they denied his 531st (or so ) Petition to recount the votes in Florida again? (Although forcing recounts in other states might have given him the electoral votes needed, just a FYI)

As simply as I can put it, the freedoms that we have as individuals must always bear in mind the freedoms of others. Nowhere in the editor’s letter was there any mention of consideration to the soldiers and officers that now may have to risk their lives for how much ever longer because of this article. He barely acknowledged the civilian lives of NYC and DC that may now be jeopardized.

I personally would love to grab this guy by the scrotum and take him on a one month trip across country to show him that there are a multitude more people in America than just NYC and DC. And after he has full opportunity to eat and talk and heaven forbid play a game (baseball, checkers, hungry hungry hippos) he might find that they tend to be of a better caliber of people than what he is used to being around. Sadly, the people of the small towns and cities are the most vulnerable to attack should a terror campaign begin in earnest.

I am sure he saw the fear and desperation, the confusion and anger in the eyes of many thousands of people (if only in photographs) during and after 9/11. I have to sit and wonder if he remembered all that before he decided to publish.

So let us say that the War on Terror must last only one extra day (an unrealistic estimate I assure you) because of the damage done by making this information public. I ask, was it worth it? Stan Lee summed it up best in Amazing Spiderman “With great power comes great responsibility.” This editor showed no effort of forethought in my opinion, hopefully his final punishment will be on par with that of Prometheus.



reply posted on 26-6-2006 @ 09:44 PM by WyrdeOne
I'm sure the feeling is mutual...


nytimes.com

The government would like us to publish only the official line, and some of our elected leaders tend to view anything else as harmful to the national interest. For example, some members of the Administration have argued over the past three years that when our reporters describe sectarian violence and insurgency in Iraq, we risk demoralizing the nation and giving comfort to the enemy. Editors start from the premise that citizens can be entrusted with unpleasant and complicated news, and that the more they know the better they will be able to make their views known to their elected officials. Our default position — our job — is to publish information if we are convinced it is fair and accurate, and our biggest failures have generally been when we failed to dig deep enough or to report fully enough.


I thought this quote really summed it up nicely.

[edit on 26-6-2006 by WyrdeOne]

edit to shorten link

[edit on 27-6-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Now a witness to Breitbart\'s death vanishes
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Cuba: Judge Rejects Efforts to Open CIA Volume on Bay of Pigs
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
US Official Detained for Donation to Al Qaeda - Anonymous Involved
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags