Originally posted by Communication_Burger
Originally posted by JebusSaves
Hehe, that guy reminds of the WWF wrestlers of old.
Originally posted by Delta Alter
Couldn't agree more, how can you take that seriously? It's just too much
I do see what you mean here, but if he's up there telling the Truth I don't really give a *BEEP*. It's not about Alex Jones, and his crazy
performances, it's about what he's saying. The information is all I want. Trust you people to discard everything he has said and turn against him
for something as trivial as this.
Don't misinterpret that comment as an attack on the message. The message is sound, its the theatrics involved indelivery that I was commenting on. It
is hard to watch and take seriously for some of us here, so for a lay-person who is unsure of anything in this arena, this would be a turn off. My
thoughts on the message itself are evident a few posts later.
Originally posted by Communication_Burger
Originally posted by JebusSaves
in this case he could sense(just as anyone else who was watching) the level of embarrassment coming from the Aud. The S'n-word'ing laughter at times
reaks of 'we're laughing cause we think we should'. The audience may have bought everything that David Icke said, but none of them stepped up to
applaud him, and in that everyone who saw that and was there went deeper into 'the closet'.
They laughed at times, but didn't applaud which is the general accepted note that 'We agree and wish to make that clear'.
Well you must be watching the wrong interview, because I saw him draw applause at least twice. Toward the end he really got quite a good clap, when he
shut Wogan up about the Yanks.
Notice at the comments he 'drew' applause to.
One was a snide comment on Eastenders, which illicted an automatic response from the crowd as I would wager every single of of those people Watch
Eastenders.
If the message was what they were 'clapping' at, then many other times he says better deserving applause and gets non. This crowd weren't paying
attention to the interview per se, they were more interested at the tete a tete between Terry and David.
The George Bush laugh too, that wasn't anything mopre than an automated 'George Bush is a fool, some one has said it...lets laugh' response that
every 'Chat Show' seems to play on.
Don't be fooled, that audience was far more supportive to Terry on the outside.
Yes, each and every person may have agreed internally with David, but the fact is they still feel embarrassed to show there support for fear of
ridicule.
The applause at the end is nothing more than another automatic response from a large flashing sign that says 'Applause'. Listen to it again, there
is no show of feeling in it, its a reserved clap.
Originally posted by Communication_Burger
Originally posted by JebusSaves
David is obviously aggressive in the Interview.
Wogan doesn't say much because of the way Icke is conducting himself. As a Chat Show host, Wogan has taken down better speakers and gauges the
audience for his own responses.
Wogan is a bumbling idiot, and that's the only reason he still has his awful Celebrity Chat show. The sheltered Buffoon didn't even know what PNAC
is. I have no doubt Wogan is a good man under all the Plastic show business coating, but he needs to wake the **** up.
[edit on 25-6-2006 by Communication_Burger]
Yes, I agree with Terry being a Buffoon, but thats what the people who go to his show want. If you go on Wogan, you to to tell the world about your
New Film, rise in the Charts or your great New TV show, you DON'T go on to inform the masses of the New World Order.
Your second attack on Wogan however, I feel is a little unfair, the one about PNAC.
Most people have no idea what this is, not because they lead sheltered lives, but because others shelter them from it.
My own parents have no idea what it is, and they are far from what you seem to imply as 'Sheltered Buffoons'. They just haven't looked in the right
places.
My point isnt the message is wrong, its the place and way these people present it.
Wogan's viewing Audience has an average age range of 55, always has.
It doesn't help that David went on in an obvious aggressive/frustrated manner, that again detracts from the message and gave the impression he just
wanted to slap down Wogan on his own show.
David should be above that, infact anyone trying to teach the world should be above it.
He could have been more successful with a different attitude.
The Message - Right
The Medium - Wrong.