It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Looking for some constructive help

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2006 @ 04:57 PM
link   
I'M GOING AT IT WITH THESE MORONS OVER AT SPACE.COM


If anyone would like to assist me it would be much appreciated, I'm doing my best, believe me...

Thank you for your help, you would need to register at space.com

Its me vs the world over there....

uplink.space.com...




posted on Jun, 23 2006 @ 05:28 PM
link   
credible_evidence,

Oh man I feel your pain! Just trying to read through this " Debate" has been nauseating!

I think you may have misstepped by taking the Dr. Greer and DP approach. I would focus on UFO History where the Sceptics can not Blindly focus on the Pro's and Con's of Testimony alone.

If I get a chance later I'll swing over and lend ya a Hand.



posted on Jun, 23 2006 @ 05:37 PM
link   
Looks like you have some supporters over there...

Bring up the latest mexico sightings, and see if you can get the full video...
there is your evidence!

now go slap those mofos...



posted on Jun, 23 2006 @ 05:52 PM
link   
I always like the Occam's Razor argument, but turn it around a little. The simplest explanation is generally the right one. Regarding UFOs, it might be simpler and easier to accept that at least some of the witnesses and sightings are seeing and describing exactly what they encountered. That there are far too many observations and descriptions by credible observers to reasonably, rationally explain them all away as hoaxes, hallucinations or misidentifications. The "explanations" eventually become more far-fetched than even aliens from other planets.

Call somebody a "pelicanist," too. They like that.




top topics
 
0

log in

join