Although the developement of these weapons would violate treaties.Is a non-lethal gas a weapon of mass destruction?
The problems with the Russian gas were unfortunate at worst irresponsable but certainly well intentioned.
When used in the circumstances in Moscow,if effective and safe,most people would welcome a solution with no loss of life.If however an effective gas
could be developed with a reliable delivery system which could be used as a potential first strike weapon with little or no warning I think we could
find that countries that felt threatened might be tempted to act pre-emptively.




