posted on Jun, 22 2006 @ 08:04 AM
Once upon a time we as Americans lived our lives without fear. Everyone had to confess there was indeed something great about America that must be
even confessed even to this date. But then something strange suddenly came along. In 1991 we had a war against Iraq. It was called, Operation
Desert Storm. After that war, President George Bush, Sr. began to tell us about something called a NEW WORLD ORDER.
What was this? Where did the concept come from? When did it start? Who are involved in its construction besides President George Bush, Sr.?
Amazingly in that major discussion, the former president did not elaborate. At such a critical time on a podium before the entire world, what was the
agenda to bring this up, and then leave it cold and flat? Anyone who wanted to find out what it was had to study history. Some already knew that it
was the dream of Adolf Hitler. Some already knew it was the object of Communism. The problem was that only a few knew. Independent publications
were talking about this as a growing agenda and concern among American leadership. They were claiming it was an anti-Constitutional agenda. But,
with most dialogue today, people are sent to confuse and gridlock to the point where the American people believe there is no consequence for believing
the wrong thing. But for a long time, such people who supported this concept, like the ones of history, began to say that the American people are
"too free." They were saying that there is a necessity of giving up "some of" their liberties, because this would be necessary for security.
They were just as free as they were for 200 years. Those 200 years proved that with their liberties, their security was intact. Some Americans knew
that this concept was something new to America, but not to brutal regimes: that they have to give up their liberties to achieve something they always
had with their liberties for most of the history of this country: SECURITY. Most brutal regimes claimed that liberties must be either limited or
non-existent for SECURITY to be maintained. But now something strange recently happened.
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, two airplanes plowed right into the World Trade Center buildings. The American people were shocked. Those planes
just marched clear in and through. No military jets were seen around them neither to stop them nor to even ask for ID, ransom, etc. Dick Cheney was
asked how they were able to just march through like that and why military jets were not around to stop them, and immediately and again, something
followed that gave ammunition to the big bad ol' "Conspiracy theorists" that are out to get us: a lie. Cheney claimed that those military jets
were not sent because they didn't want to SHOOT DOWN the passenger planes that were used as missiles. In other words, if a plane even strays off
course, he was saying that if military jets were sent, they are supposed to shoot them down instead of requesting ID and information on what they
want, where they're going, etc. This constitutes the first major QUESTION that the "conspiracy theorists" demand answers for that have not been
answered to date. A strange team of people are constantly sent to make sure the questions are NOT answered.
In the 1970s when I was in high school, a report appeared of how a small airplane strayed into Kremlin airspace in the former Soviet Union. At that
time the Soviet Union was considered a power to be reckoned with. As a result of what happened, THE REPORT SHOWED THAT THE KREMLIN LEADERS TURNED
ABSOLUTELY RED IN THE FACE!
This time not only was the airspace in the greatest nation in the world compromised, BUT 3,000 LIVES WERE SNUFFED OUT! But this time was different.
This time not only did the faces of the American leaders NOT turn red, but actual pictures of the tragedy were used in the President's re-election
campaign that took place on his watch! It was as if he was proud that he failed to stop the tragedy. His subsequent demands proved that he was proud
of his failure.
This was an unprecedented circumstance to befall a president. But from that day to this, though this president failed to protect the American people,
he began to claim rewards and benefits for failing to protect America. His first move was to stand on the top of a seeming pulpit at Ground Zero
telling the world that he is about to destroy "all evil." No sign of distress or even embarrassment was shown on his face. If a president fails to
protect the people, is he supposed to be given powers above his presidential oath of office and be made a king? All the other presidents who
protected us were not given such benefits. If the day comes when we reward presidents for failing to do their jobs (albeit he was outsmarted) how is
it we cannot tell that such presidents will fail us again?
The president then "concocts" something called "The Patriot Act," which is a reward package for himself for failing to protect the American
people. This Act is a package of laws that claims the president can arrest and detain anyone just on his accusation alone of having ties to
terrorists. Once accused, the victim has no due process nor legal recourse to even prove his innocence. He is accused and tried in secret. There is
no set date for his release since he may never be released at all forever, and even judges cannot look over the matter. The President, from that time
forward, began to press that this is a "Constitutional" and "Vital" law. In fact a law we never needed until he came along. From that time and
in spotty places, the same people began to tell us that the Constitution is an "outdated" document.
Unfortunately these laws and principles were already adopted and practiced by the Inquisitors of Rome before this country started and which this
country was a protest to, it was practiced also by the Communists and by the Nazis. President Bush didn't give these brutal systems any form of
credit for having these principles before he introduced them to the American people. Even worse is the fact that President Bill Clinton, another New
World Order devotee, already pushed for the very same principles contained in the Patriot Act to be established into law with his 1995 Omnibus
Anti-terrorism proposals. He also was given no credit for the so-called, "hard decisions" Bush claims that he has to make as he is empowered to
bypass the constitution through failing to protect the American people.