It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by prelude
Russians were superior to the Germans in strategy in many ways that's why they won
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Overy's word is "inadequate". Yours is "completely baseless". You are wrong.
In his prison cell at Nuremberg, Hitler's foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, wrote a brief memoir in the course of which he explored the reasons for Germany's defeat.
He picked out three factors that he thought were critical:
1 the unexpected 'power of resistance' of the Red Army;
2 the vast supply of American armaments;
3 and the success of Allied air power.
This last was Hitler's explanation too.
Originally posted by INc2006
ok first of all the Brits were starting to win the war in Africa only because hitler was building up and preparing for the invasion of the eastern bloc and denyed Rommel access to more tiger tanks and tanks and troops in general, that's why the brits won in tobruk in 1940.
Originally posted by INc2006
ok first of all, seriously the russian military is very advanced, the T-90 and T-98 main battle tanks are very advanced and can be put in comparison with the MA1A american tanks, plus the US has 8k tanks but not all of them are MA1A, some of them are mediums, heavy, and some of them and light tanks. and even thoughthe US has 8k tanks, russia has 30k...they focused on simple, less-expensive, easy to build tanks, aircraft, etc. they focused on numbers rather than techonlogy, and that could work. imagine 30k tanks swarming europe, along with the respective armies of the fomer eastern bloc countries, that could mount up to 40k tanks swarming Western europe...
Originally posted by INc2006
but personally they are Chechen rebels not the general terrorist groups like Al qaeda or so.
As for casualties inflicted on opposing armies you only hvae to look at the statistics. Hell teh Red Army lost 5 million soldiers in the first year of the war, not to mention they had 18 million wounded during the conflict - of course many were returned to duty. The Germans lost 3 million men on the Eastern Front during the entire war.
Originally posted by prelude
80% General Chechens voted to stay with Russia ...and the Vote was supervised by international observers ...
The elections we were about to witness were - according to Moscow - free and fair.
But foreign journalists are not free to move around Chechnya.
Being part of an official Kremlin excursion is the only way to get in and get around
In the end Akhmad Kadyrov, it turned out, had won more than 80% of the vote.
It had been a truly democratic election - well, at least that is what the string of officials said up on the podium.
Maybe they just had not heard the widespread accounts of vote rigging, intimidation and ballot stuffing.
Our tour over, it was time to go home.
Lord Frank Judd of the United Kingdom, the former Council of Europe rapporteur for Chechnya...
...Lord Judd told Chechnya Weekly that the Council of Europe does not at present plan to send official observers to Chechnya's presidential election.
Q: Who can vote?
Voters must be aged 18 and Russian citizens resident in Chechnya.
Nearly 597,000 are eligible to vote in 430 polling stations. Turnout in each constituency must be at least 25%.
Russian servicemen permanently stationed there, put at some 34,400, can also vote.
Q: Will there be monitors?
The process is overseen by the Chechen Electoral Commission.
Russia's Central Election Commission says 10 international organisations, including the Arab League and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, are sending observers.
There will also be about 1,000 Russian monitors.
EU bodies have declined to take part
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Which international observers were they, the ones from Kazakhstan? Or the Belarus?
But foreign journalists are not free to move around Chechnya.
Being part of an official Kremlin excursion is the only way to get in and get around
In the end Akhmad Kadyrov, it turned out, had won more than 80% of the vote.
It had been a truly democratic election - well, at least that is what the string of officials said up on the podium.
Maybe they just had not heard the widespread accounts of vote rigging, intimidation and ballot stuffing.
Our tour over, it was time to go home.
Lord Frank Judd of the United Kingdom, the former Council of Europe rapporteur for Chechnya...
...Lord Judd told Chechnya Weekly that the Council of Europe does not at present plan to send official observers to Chechnya's presidential election.
Q: Who can vote?
Voters must be aged 18 and Russian citizens resident in Chechnya.
Russian servicemen permanently stationed there, put at some 34,400, can also vote.
Q: Will there be monitors?
The process is overseen by the Chechen Electoral Commission.
Russia's Central Election Commission says 10 international organisations, including the Arab League and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, are sending observers.
There will also be about 1,000 Russian monitors.
Chechen presidential elections 2003
BBC Correspondent
Russia and the Chechnya Referendum
Douglas Davidson, Charge d'Affaires of U.S. Mission to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
Statement to the OSCE Permanent Council
Vienna, Austria
March 27, 2003
Released by the U.S. Mission to the OSCE
(As delivered)
"Mr. Chairman, the U.S. Government has closely followed the preparations for the conduct of the referendum on a new constitution, and we are pleased that it took place without acts of violence or terrorism.
We are also pleased that mobile ballot boxes were allowed to cross into Ingushetia to allow internally displaced persons to vote there.
Further, we have taken note today of the concerns expressed by Ambassador Strohal about some of the processes and procedures with regard to the organization and conduct of the referendum. We are certainly not in a position to comment on the accuracy of the Russian reports that the referendum received a 96 percent approval with a turnout of 79 percent of the electorate, given that of course, ODIHR itself was not in a position to fully observe the referendum"
Originally posted by Daedalus3
What's all this rubbish about Chechen rebels not being terrorists...
they're terrorists and thats the end of that..
One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Originally posted by northwolf
Daedalus, they differ from your standard breed of Al qaida by the fact they are both Terrorists and Rebels (or freedom fighters, depends on your point of view) They wan't a free chechenya, they're not just blowing up Russians because they are infidel.
If they'd contained their attacks only against Russian military i'd support them, but now, i despise them because of the cowardly attacks against civilians... (and yes Russians kill civilians too, but i allready have a dislike for Russian government (not people) for other reasons)
Originally posted by Daedalus3
The chechens don't want freedom. They want peace. Few understand that the majority of the rebel supply influx comes from the middle east and YES western countries.It is a continuation of the afghan war which the US tried to capitalise on post cold war.