posted on Jun, 30 2006 @ 10:21 AM
One thing i do happen to notice is a mention of the removal of the US government under the realization of concrete proof of inside job on 9-11..
And the resulting "attacks" by enemys... and disorder of the countries security.
(a warning, to not act on coming new information, for the good of the people?)
of that, i disagree... If our government was cast down, and had temporary confusion until new elections, the supreme court could keep things legal
long enough to get order and law back together... (if nothing else)
I see that as a potential outcome... (if 9-11 conspiracies are true) and am willing to deal with a country without a president, until one that truly
represents the people can be properly elected... (the normal chain of command, would also be taken down from the same connections most likely).
And as far as being attacked, when and if the US people actually support a full investigation and presentation of damning evidence...
isn't the removal of a certain meddling overpowerful president one of the main reasons that islamic extremists are fighting us? (dont they hate him,
worse than americans in general?)
Wouldn't they give a new leadership a chance to form, and see what the new foreign policy would be?
If they attacked, they could be sure of a warmonger elect... if they held off, then they would be smarter by far... (this is assuming that they
didn't attack american civilian targets on 9-11)
and no matter what you think, ignorance, isn't equated to "dumb"
I dunno... the critic has stated many common disinfo points (i.e: afghan origin of terrorists- instead of Saudi) so i dont know what to beleive... but
I do know that i dont agree with the surmmation...
and as far as code words... I sure hope so, or i wasted my time even commenting...
[edit on 30-6-2006 by LazarusTheLong]