posted on Oct, 24 2003 @ 05:32 PM
Very good, East Coast and Silk.
The Crash, whether it was a Boeing Plane, or an Airbus plane, Silk, I think ti would have been treated the same, since this whole thing got forgotten
regardless. And youre right, 2 years later they still havent figured out what happened. So they say.
Wind shear is VERY possible. This does happen, wind shear out of no where has knocked planes, trees, what have you out of the air or off mountain
tops., But Im thinking its more than simple windshear.
I lean more and more towards sabotage. Perhaps, a certain mechanic or otherwise.. loosened the bolts. A lone Arab, perhaps angry at his post 9/11
treatment, or a long time sympathiser with Al Qaeda, but never joining or knowing anyone, did his own mini crusade. Perhaps he was an actual
Of course, another sabotage I can think of, what about Boeing? They have been in a war with Airbus for quite some time, even at this time, perhaps
they wanted to smear Airbus a bit, work on destroying thier safety records, ect, but making this happen. SApeculation of course, but its all thread to
entertain until we get some answers.
Incidentally, Silk, Boeing left Seattle, they are now HQ in Chicago. We still have a few of the manufacturing plants here, but many of them have
closed down, and thousands of people here have been laid off. You could almost say, 9/11 hit Seattle harder economically that in did New York, our
whole #ing economy dpended upon the manufacture of planes, when Boeing slipped big time, it took out damn near whatever the dot coms hadnt killed
But, as East Coast said, I do hope the facts arent tampered with, like they tried with flight 800.
I had a couple of pages on flight 587 in my bookmarks, but those pages are either gone, or they have moved, so Im trying to locate some others, or
find out where they moved to. They all covered the aspect of sabotage.
I am leaning more and more towards that.