It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Urizen
gemwolf, you are right about all that from our general point of view.
I didn't argue the point "Can you see an object without knowing what the object is.."
***Snip***
- If you are a baby and you are put in a room with some objects - will you recongnize certain things as material stuff(objects)? Well you can't say can you..?
***Snip***
its hard for me to show the point I want to make..
***Snip***
sorry, can't really show my whole thoughts on this.
..argh..english...
[edit on 23/6/06 by Urizen]
Originally posted by Gemwolf
Originally posted by Urizen
gemwolf, you are right about all that from our general point of view.
I didn't argue the point "Can you see an object without knowing what the object is.."
***Snip***
- If you are a baby and you are put in a room with some objects - will you recongnize certain things as material stuff(objects)? Well you can't say can you..?
***Snip***
its hard for me to show the point I want to make..
***Snip***
sorry, can't really show my whole thoughts on this.
..argh..english...
[edit on 23/6/06 by Urizen]
LoL. I feel your pain. Sometimes I'm frustrated with the English as well. Would anyone mind if I were to speak Afrikaans? (But I hear what YOU are trying to say.)
Anyhows, that was the point... We're almost debating two different things here. But as you say... Difference between babies and adults. What I'm calling nonsense is the fact that the Natives supposedly couldn't see the ships. They were all adults, yes? An object won't be "invisible" just because it's the first time an adult see it or/and because it doesn't fit into his/her frame of reference...