Bad politics are nothing more than they appear to be. True Machiavellian minds are few and far between. Many of our modern leaders have been willing
to do things at home and abroad which have a limited radius of success. thye seem content to take the pain when it comes to the 'fallout.'
Vietnam was my father's war. As such, I am familiar with its battles, and its outcomes. It's fair to say that the two share certain similarities,
but they are not wholly the same. Iraq's insurgency bears little resemblance to the orgainzaed resistence of the NVA. The Khmer Rouge of Cambodian
infamy would find more in common with today's insurgents in downtown Baghdad.
The thing that most Americans are going to "remember" is that both wars were overshadowed by bad politics. At a time when forward thinking was
called for, future historians will give many pages to the dissection of this period's leaders and theri poorly made decisions. The bottom line is
that the American people will remember these conflicts as being mis-managed by people who asked for and then abused large amounts of trust and good
will. that's the real similarity between Vietnam and Iraq.
Today's leaders have lost sight of what's really in our national interest. They lack the flexibility and creativity of the classical Statesman when
it comes to getting these things. To be electable, and then to achieve high office, means owing more than they can pay off in a mere two Presidential
terms. the people who back the candidates know this, and they are forced to go for increasingly bigger "payoffs" to justify their expenses.
Consider this. The next President of the United will spend 200 million dollars to get a job that pays 200 thousand dollars a year. the people who
piny up that money will number less than 50,000. That's everyone from the guy who makes a five dollar contribution over the internet to the mogul
who shells out ten thousand dollars a plate to each cold rubber chicken with the candidate. The top ten percent of these donors are going to expect
to get something for their time and effort. that means legislation, or contracts. This was true for George Washington, and it really is true for the
current president.
Our country has not been lead by very many Statesmen. the fact of the matter is that if we put our minds to it, we could count all the truely great
minds using just one hand. A majority of those who have sought the highest office in our land were and still are willing to do anything to get the
job. Their dilema is how to make he pay off and get down to the business of government, and building their legacy. 21st Century Presidents are going
to be defined by this trade-off. Some will pay off their benefactors with legislation, others will pay off with contracts.
Throughout recorded history, the biggest pay offs have always come in times of war. the temptation to jump in to a fight that you really do think you
can win has seduced more than a few U.S. Presidents. Until recently, many of those fights were very one-sided, and the Americans did win. It's a
telling fact that today's Presidents require bigger and bigger wars to make this payoff. The temptation to give in to the allure of such bad
politics is made that much worse when these stop to realize that they won't have to suffer anything worse that low popularity poll numbers if they do
these things.

