Has anyone heard of the Hollow moon theory?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 17-6-2006 @ 12:21 AM by Techsnow
Well there is no doubt that on Nov 20, 1969, NASA concluded that the Moon rang like a bell for more than an hour. Although I didn't find any info at NASA about this, it's all over the internet so it is a reality.

Now my question is, besides that, what other evidence do we have that the Moon may be hollow?

There is a
possible alien moonbase.

There is also the mysterious far side of the moon that we never see.

There is also ancient evidence a possible time when there was no moon!
Aristotle told of a people who lived in Arcadia, a mountainous region in Central Greece, long before the coming of the Greeks. The Greek term Proscelene means before the moon. In Tibetan texts there are stories of a people on a lost continent called Gondwana, said to be civilized before the moon shone in the night sky. Bolivian symbols have been interpreted by Dr. P. Allen as records that a satellite came into orbit around the Earth about 11,500 to 13,000 years ago.

Was there in fact no moon in ancient history? If true, could the creation of a moon of caused the great flood recorded in ancient history?

Could the moon be hollow? Could it be some sort of space station covered over by a natural looking surface?

Was NASA hinting to the public of these possibilites on Nov 20, 1969 or was it all an accident?

... is alternative 3 in fact a reality?


reply posted on 17-6-2006 @ 01:45 AM by txdan06
please thats ridiculous all of things you are insinuating... ok look its simple physics that if any of you all had MAYBE GONE TO COLLEGE you could simply figure this out. OK now gravity= g(m1)(m2)/r squared which means that the g which is the gravitational constant multiplied by mass one and then multiplied by mass two equals a sum which is then divided by radius squared of m1. Ok so we know that the gravity on the moon is 1/6th of the earth's gravity so all you would do is put 1.6m/s(squared on the seconds) on the left side of the equation and then you would plug in all the knows such as m2 (in this case as in most times to figure out m1, m2 would be 1 kilogram to make the equation easier to do) and then divide by the radius squared which is common knowledge, and you would find that the moon has the mass it shuold have for a satellite that size. Now of course the "aliens" or other totally made up idea, could somehow carve out the inside of the planet yet still keep all of that mass to induce gravity kind of blows my sense of science away. It is ridiculous to keep on with this alien crap i hate it!! ok now there is a high probablility of life in the universe... but wait :0 !!!! the probablility that the intelligent life will survive and actually reach where we are the odds become nearly impossible!!! look at it this way... how would an intelligent alien civilization find us?? our radio waves havent even gone to other star systems yet.. not to mention if they did find us they wouldnt be making piss deals with our governments- why would they need our governments anyways>?? they have the technology to find and get to us.. why the hell would they need or want to talk to ANY humans??



reply posted on 17-6-2006 @ 06:55 AM by ArMaP
I would like to know what H. G. Wells would think of all the theories that may have appeared because of his books.

Books like
The First Men in the Moon and The War of the Worlds may be responsible for a large percentage of what we think are "modern" theories, when after all they are just a continuation or an adaptation of what he wrote many years ago

PS: The First Men in the Moon was wrote in 1901 and The War of the Worlds in 1898.


reply posted on 17-6-2006 @ 07:08 AM by Communication_Burger
Originally posted by txdan06
please thats ridiculous all of things you are insinuating... ok look its simple physics that if any of you all had MAYBE GONE TO COLLEGE you could simply figure this out. OK now gravity= g(m1)(m2)/r squared which means that the g which is the gravitational constant multiplied by mass one and then multiplied by mass two equals a sum which is then divided by radius squared of m1.


Calm down there, Galileo. It was the 'experts' at NASA, and MIT, that insinuated something was unusual about the moon, not us. We are just picking up on things they have said.

Originally posted by txdan06
Ok so we know that the gravity on the moon is 1/6th of the earth's gravity so all you would do is put 1.6m/s(squared on the seconds) on the left side of the equation and then you would plug in all the knows such as m2 (in this case as in most times to figure out m1, m2 would be 1 kilogram to make the equation easier to do) and then divide by the radius squared which is common knowledge, and you would find that the moon has the mass it shuold have for a satellite that size.


You may very well be right, but that does nothing to explain the 'gonging'.

Originally posted by txdan06
Now of course the "aliens" or other totally made up idea, could somehow carve out the inside of the planet yet still keep all of that mass to induce gravity kind of blows my sense of science away. It is ridiculous to keep on with this alien crap i hate it!!


I didn't say anything about Aliens. You like to make out that you know a great deal about the Moon, but do you even know what it is, and how it got there?

Originally posted by txdan06
ok now there is a high probablility of life in the universe... but wait :0 !!!! the probablility that the intelligent life will survive and actually reach where we are the odds become nearly impossible!!! look at it this way... how would an intelligent alien civilization find us?? our radio waves havent even gone to other star systems yet.. not to mention if they did find us they wouldnt be making piss deals with our governments- why would they need our governments anyways>?? they have the technology to find and get to us.. why the hell would they need or want to talk to ANY humans??


Not that I think Aliens have to be involved in any Hollow moon theory, but isn't it arrogant to confine other races, who may or may not be out there, to our rather limited understanding of physical boundaries? Relativity can be gotten around, if you can find a way of reducing the mass of your vehicle to match that of a single packet of light. I'm sure there are many other ways, completely out of my range of comprehension. How the hell do you know how they would travel? Isn't it also arrogant to think they could only track us by the Radio signals emitted from our instruments, and devices?

You are thinking with your mind closed.



reply posted on 17-6-2006 @ 10:52 AM by gfad
This topic is quite interesting but it's a shame that tis been hijacked by people insinuating aliens. I wish someone could find an official NASA source on this as the statement has transformed in the course of this thread from "the moon rang like a bell" to something along the lines of "the moon sounds like titanium"!!

From the moons gravitational pull I dont think you can conclude that the moon is hollow and not solid. You can work out its mass as a fraction of the earths and then ASSUMING that its matter is as dense as the earths you can work out that its solid but of course there could be some more dense matter making up some of its whole. Of course I dont believe this, I think the moon is a big solid rock!

I find the idea of an alien base on the far side of the moon to be farcical. It has been seen loads of times by astronauts and photographed by satallites.
Here is a pic from wikipedia.

Originally posted by incunabula
Other anomalies of "our" moon is the puzzle of the moons age for example the first rock Neil Armstrong picked up after landing on the Sea of Tranquility was older! than the oldest rocks on earth. over 99percent of roks brought back after analyses turned out to be older than 90 percent of the oldest rock that can be found on earth.that rock turned out to be 3.6 billion years old other rocks even older at 4.3,4.5,4.6 and even one alleged to be 5.3 billion years old, the ones on earth are about 3.7 billion y.o and the rocks that were brought back was thought by scientists to be from one of the youngest areas back then of our moon!

Another one is the dark areas of the moon known as maria(dried up seas) some of these maria form the familiar "man on the moon" but astronauts found it extremely difficult to drill into the surface of these black plains, soil samples were loaded with rare metals and elements like titanium,zirconium,yttrium,and even berrylium. also rustproof iron found on the moon,pure iron particles that dont rust were unheard of before (although there is a solid iron pillar of unknown age in New Dehli,India, that has also never rusted and noone knows why). Inmense clouds of water vapour,the moons lack of dust,structures on the moon including (pyramids found on the actual Sea of Tranquility (now obviously suppressed) and of course the list goes on.

Incunabula, your statement about rocks on the moon being older than those on earth is very easily explained by the fact that earth is techtonically active and the continental plates are being constantly refreshed however they are not on the moon.

And please!!! What exactly is rust-proof iron?? Do you know what rust is? It's Iron Oxide, formed by a simple reaction with the metal. There is no such thing as Iron that, under some conditions, can't be oxidised, and its ridiculous to sugest such a thing. I doubt there is much water and oxygen on the moon and thats why it hasn't rusted.

Originally posted by Matyas
3361+197741

equals

201102*

Palindromic Solar System
*I consider this a sacred number-M


Matyas, your information of adding up some numbers and getting a coincidentally pallindromic number shows absolutely nothing! Have you tried adding them up when they are not in base 10, are they still palindromic then? Why is it that you have chosen to use base 10, dont forget those Greys with only 8 digits! There is also no reason to regard it as a sacred number as its totally unique, if there were a variety of different things which all summed to 201102 then it would be special but I bet these are the only things which do! Anyone can pick a list of figures and find they miraculously add up to a palindromic number.

Originally posted by ed 209
I've heard of accounts from the past that say there wasn't always a Moon there at all, that it was placed there and that's why it macthes the size of the Sun in the sky and why eclipses occur, as it's used as some kind of timepiece - related to that is the idea that the Moon is so placed so as to make biological life possible (as it controls the tides, for example) and the whole alien-experiment thing is about cultivating water-based life on Earth.


ed 209, you discuss the similarity in size of the moon and sun when viewed from earth, yet this is just a very common misconception. In fact because the moons orbit around the earth is ot circular it actually changes size and during some eclipses it appears larger than the sun and during annular eclipses is actually smaller creating a ring of fire effect.

I really hope this will clear up some of the arguments about aliens and we could get back to the topic and discuss why the moon could "ring like a bell".
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 25 member flags