Originally posted by jbondo
So, because it names a famous dead actor then it must be true?

Sorry about that.... thought " I " put " I " there. Didn't mean to include the general concensus.
MY reasoning of validity is this... A very famous actor at the time ( and still well known today ) was claimed by a friend to of done this.
If there was no truth to it, one would want to clear his name asap, would they not?

How in the world does that prove validity? Why was JS in a Tibetan Monastery? I just find the whole story a bit contrived.

A lot of people have travelled to Tibet seeking many things, why would JS be any different.