Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Totally false
"We now find one barrel for every four we consume." Colin J.Campbell
So why do you believe Colin Campbell instead of the BP people? What will increase oil prices faster than claiming that it's fast running out? Why
would it make sense for BP to consistently claim that there is still plenty of oil left when governments consistently refuse to invest in
alternatives? What do they have to lose by saying that oil discovery is declining when such large reserves still remain?
nd we pump them out as fast as we could.
No we are not and no one who knows anything about economics argues this point. It just does not pay to floor the market leading to crash in pricing
as was experienced back in 1998 when spot prices were running at 8 USD a barrel with long term contracts being settled for FAR less.
We are definitively not finding oil faster then we pump it.
World reserves are in fact increasing according as new finds are being made and rising prices allows for the exploitation of harder to extract oil.
When the price went past 60 USD a barrel even North Sea oil becomes very profitable!
The new data estimate total world oil reserves at 1.15 t barrel, about 10 % higher than previously reported for 2002. Additionally, global oil
reserves have increased almost continuously over the past 30 years, BP officials said. World reserves now represent 41 years of production at current
rates.
By comparison, in 1980 reserves equivalent to only 29 years of production were known.
The world has now produced some 80 % of the oil reserves that
were known in 1980; yet exploration success and application of technology has led to current reserves that are 70 % higher, BP said. The company
has published its statistical review of world energy for 53 years.
Looking at natural gas, BP reported global reserves of 176 tcm, 13 % higher than those previously reported for 2002.
The company said that gas
reserves have more than doubled since 1980 as a result of exploration, new technology, and the "unstranding" of gas reserves through LNG and
other technologies.BP Group CEO John Browne emphasized that oil and gas are not being depleted at an accelerated rate.
"The data [illustrate] the continued growth in reserve volumes across the world," Browne wrote in the review's introduction. "At current levels
of consumption, there are sufficient reserves to meet oil demand for some 40 years and to meet natural gas demand for well over 60 years."
He added that there appears to be considerable scope for proved reserves and production to keep rising in Russia and elsewhere.
"Reserves, globally, have grown over time, and it is clear that the issue of energy security, which has been so prominent over the last year, is
driven not by a physical shortage of supply but by the challenges of ensuring, in a world where demand and supply are not collocated, that there will
be sufficient traded oil and gas to meet rising demand."
www.gasandoil.com...
I would particularly like to you to focus your attention on the bolded parts.
How it can it be argued that we are not finding oil fast when we have used up so much of what we used to consider 'world reserves' not long ago?
Isn't it much like arguing that whatever is currently in your fridge, ready for quick consumption, is all there is while ignoring the supermarket
down the road? Isn't supply more about what your willing to be pay instead of some finite supply number?
Anyway, if PeakOil is unreal, the current oil price those days and the volatility of the market seem to go along that theory, not the other
way around.
What does oil prices have to do with oil availability in the ground? Why does prices keep rising despite oil contracts being met? Why should there be
a massive oversupply of oil on the market when there is no market for it despite the high cost of maintaining the excess capacity as while as the
likely effect on prices? Why would anyone offer more than the market wants at current price regimes?
Please show me which corporations/agencies/countries could not get the oil they wanted at current prices? Why do so many presume to insist that rising
prices fundamentally means that there is too little oil on the world markets? Wouldn't that require these markets to be free and fair?
Stellar
I know it's hard to believe that
something so 'valuable' can be so common but i am confident that i can prove that the US foreign policy of the last few decades were persistently
employed to restrict global access to oil. The wars were certainly in large part over oil but not to bring it to the market! 
