 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:47 AM by anxietydisorder
|
I find it interesting that there is activity north and south of the pacific north west, but there is very little activity around the Juan De Fuca
subduction zone.
If a big one is going to hit, I have to predict the area off of Vancouver Island or as far south as Oregon could have a megathrust event in the next
few days.
But maybe I should take this over to the BTS Dreams & Personal Predictions Forum because I'm no expert....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:48 AM by rai76
|
and then to emagine that they only register from 2.5 magnitude. This place is shaking not normal.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:51 AM by ProjectChaos
|
yea there is no way this is even close to being normal, its about 4am here ganna be tired tomorrow only another hour before the news comes on thoe,
hopefully they will have some more info.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:54 AM by rai76
|
Isn't there someone on ATS who can say anything about this? Do we have some experts here or is it just normal?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:55 AM by laiguana
|
I don't think anything out of the norm is gonna happen
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:55 AM by GoldenBuddha
|
I would say if this states itself to be true earthquakes ranging from 2.0 to 6.0 on the richter scale and in the number of twenty or more in a
localised area could potentially cause a ripple effect around the complete whole of that landmass
almost like water lapping against a sand cliff.
i have felt and pre-empted an earthquake knowing that it happened but not registering an effect more than what a heavy truck would going down the
street
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:56 AM by the_sentinal
|
alass, the rest of the world is asleep and were the only ones awake to see the world end
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:58 AM by GoldenBuddha
|
could the 700 tonne 'conventional bomb test' be creating a reaction elsewhere?
that is now certainly entering in to the head of mine considering "every action has an opposite and equal reaction"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:58 AM by d1k
|
We're now at 25 with the last two being a 4.4 and a 4.5.
Can you imagine how scared the people on those islands must be getting shaken all by 25 quakes over 6 hours knowing about last Decembers Tsunami.
[edit on 14-6-2006 by d1k]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:59 AM by rai76
|
Well, I just started (The Netherlands) to work here lol, but I really can't now!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 02:59 AM by rai76
|
Well, I just started (The Netherlands) to work here lol, but I really can't now!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:02 AM by imbalanced
|
Magnitude 5.2 - OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
I guess all the shaking up there is causeing some shaking down there too.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:04 AM by ProjectChaos
|
yea where is Sumatra? btw Im just kinda waiting to see a 9.0 reading now, I know its very unlikly but still starting to get nervous, no earthquakes in
New England in a while lol not on a fault line but still
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:07 AM by imbalanced
|
sumatra is way down to the south west of alaska, speaking globaly.
I am pretty sure that the huge ass plate is connected to the other huge
ass plate. As you can see i know alot about techtonics...lol
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:07 AM by GoldenBuddha
|
www.geophys.washington.edu...
Washington have had several earthquakes in the last 2 days
california in the last 2 weeks has had 8 or more
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:11 AM by ADVISOR
|
Originally posted by rai76
Isn't there someone on ATS who can say anything about this? Do we have some experts here or is it just normal? 
As I have said on page two;
Originally posted by ADVISOR
The closest to experts you are going to get here on ATS, (if that is what you call them  ), can be found with the
Caldera thread.

|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:11 AM by rai76
|
Maybe a stupid question but could it be something to do with a Volcano in that area? Does someone know if there is one there?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:11 AM by Astronomer70
|
The kind of activity you are seeing out in the Aleutian islands is not all that unusual. I was staitioned out there back in the 60's and it seems
like we had small quakes aperiodically, but frequently--All those islands are volcanic. It's kind of like the earth is readjusting itself after that
huge quake last year.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:13 AM by SwatMedic
|
no earthquakes in New England in a while lol not on a fault line but still

Actually there are several fault lines that run thru new england. One particular large one that runs from Maine to New York. It is very stable and I
dont recall any instability from it since 1990 when we had a small tremor.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2006 @ 03:14 AM by the_sentinal
|
yes 60 km (35 miles) SW of Kiska Volcano, Alaska that is the closest one to the action
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |