Originally posted by niteboy82The graphic image is not propoganda,
no, the picture isn't propaganda when viewed as an image meant to project the horrors of war (unless it was taken after an "insurgent" attack on a
mosque or school or some other equally horrific act). Used in a thread about bush crying while speaking, it is meant purely as propaganda. Nowhere
in the first post does it say "this is why he should be crying" nor is it implied. The title of the thread actually implies that there is a
picture of Bush crying and the "disturbing pic" warning seems very tongue in cheek.
Rather, the post says the man cried and provides a link to an external image which, it turns out, has nothing to do with him crying.
It should be noted that I am not defending Bush, nor am I saying his tears were more than a show for the cameras. I'm not. I'm merely pointing out
the complete lack of good taste in showing the picture. It's a bait and switch.
Back to arguing over whether the man has a forked tongue and cloven hoofs.
[edit on 13-6-2006 by Crakeur]