It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Legalizer
Creationists are just plain dumb
Evolution is extremley complex. We don't know 100% for sure on how it works. We do know it happens. You also seem to be holding onto a common misconception, evolution has nothing really to do with HOW life first arose. Nothing. Evolution deals specifically with the 'evolution' of life after it arose. Any discussion on evolutionary theory i.e. how it works, won't provide you with your answer's.
Light, we know light exist's. Yet we don't know for the life of us what light exactly is.
We know evolution happens. We've seen and studied the transitionary fossils, we've studied the genetics behind some of it's working's. We've witnessed it in nature and in the lab. Yet we still don't know how it works 100% for sure, just as with gravity and light. And yet, evolution is misconceptualized by creationist's and IDist's and they attack the theory of HOW it works based upon those misconceptions and think they've won the case.
Perhaps this is why Lagalizer made the statment that creationists are dumb. In a sense, he/she is right. Using old disproven theories or picking and choosing which theories to attack does seem to be just plain dumb. We can sit here and attack only those scientific theories which seemingly disagree with our favorite all powerfull father like deity, but we can't be bothered to stay on top of current discoveries and theories to better defend our view's. Yes, that is dumb. It's just plainly ignorant. People consider learning a chore these days. People just can't be bothered. And so we see post's like these. And ATS is supposed to have adopted the 'deny ignorance' mantra, appearently for no reason.
So you are saying that how we evolved from inanimate chemicals in to life has nothing to do with evolution?
Sorry I find that funny coming from someone named PROTON
Yes we have watched evolution in progress, but we have never seen some evolve from one species to another. When this happens where does the new information come from? Yes a dog can produce another variant dog of a dog but how does it produce a non-dog?
Are you implying just because one believes in God that some one is dumb? And FYI not all creationist believe that the earth was created 6000 years ago, I do believe that evolution took place, I just don't see how it could happen by itself.
Yes we have watched evolution in progress, but we have never seen some evolve from one species to another. When this happens where does the new information come from? Yes a dog can produce another variant dog of a dog but how does it produce a non-dog?
Correct. Evolutionary theory deals nothing with how life FIRST arose, just with how life evolves from life.
Sorry, I fail to see the humour. Care to point it out?
Good question. Unfortunatly, we don't currently have the answer to this question. We just know that evolution does in fact happen. There's ton's of variant's to evolutionary theory on how or how long for such an event to happen, unfortunatly, none of those theories are 100% fact's. [
God is more of the 'easy way out' answer to all question's. It's great that you do accept evolution as a reality, just as you accept gravity and many other thing's in life that we don't currently have answer's to but know exist.
Using god as the 'cure-all' answer is imo, pretty ignorant and dumb. The debate on god is another entirely lengthy discussion all on it's own. One that those who believe in god don't even bother to research on their own. Which god do you follow?
well it doesn't, it works like this, there are two dogs, one goes north and one goes south, the one that went north gets hairier and the one that goes south loses it's hair because of climate differences, the one that went north has to hunt big animals to find meat so it gets bigger and it's claws and teeth grow longer while the one that went south hunts small fast animals so it gets smaller and learns to run quickly to catch them, then a man comes along and calls dog ''a'' '' big hairy teeth monster'' and dog ''b'' ''little bald rat catcher''.
we name and classify animals according to common traits, evolution doesn't, it just allows organisims to adapt to their environment. it is not a process of biodiversity, biodiversity is a bi-product, evolution does not allow one animal to suddenly morph into another, the process is by it's nature so slow that it is impossible to measure in a snap shot.
look either way, wheres the argument, creationists say god created the earth 6000 odd years ago, first he made light and dark, then he made the oceans and the land, then he put fish in the sea,plants on the land and birds in the air, then mammels and then humans.
the theroy of evolution says first the earth came into being and orbited the sun, water developed as the earth cooled, oganisims developed here first and then moved to the land, first plants dominated the land, then donosaurs came along and evolved into birds then the mammels rose up and one of them became man. when asked what started it they just shrug, no-one knows.
wheres the argument? time lines? i can't see much else that's different, except the bible has the whole thing simplified, so what, if i wasn't educated in a modern school i'd need the story of evolution simplified aswell, so whats the big deal?
I'm sorry I don't understand how you can say that how chemicals turned into life has nothing to do with evolution.
To me it is the most important question. This and the Big Bang are the main reasons for my belief in a God.
Sometimes God is the only answer that makes any sense. It's not an easy way out in a cause and effect universe.
Please proton lets keep this civil, I have no interest in being called dumb or calling any one dumb. As for my beliefs I'm agnostic, I don't believe that some one can know the unknowable
So these dogs, how did the DNA “know” that it has to produce more hair for the dog going north? How did it know how to grow bigger teeth? Where does all this information come from?
I'm not saying that it didn't happen I saying that DNA cannot rewrite its self with more information. With the mutation you have additional information, so how does this information come into being?
I can't say that I know, But I can see from the data that something is “running the show” if you will.
Mr Mxyztpllk wrote:
So these dogs, how did the DNA “know” that it has to produce more hair for the dog going north? How did it know how to grow bigger teeth? Where does all this information come from?
you are hitting the nail on the head here with so many of your comments.
My original comment was...if people who dont believe in a Creator (i will use this term instead of evolutionist), believe that everything happened by accident....then they must believe that everything came out of some chemical reaction.
Proton....you said that evolution doesnt deal with how life first arose.
But THAT is the whole point of my question.
What exactly DOES deal with that then?
Pieman.....you said that water was formed as the earth cooled.....then why did it just form in certain areas?.....what caused it to form in the first place?....how did these organisms grow, develop DNA, develop consciousness?
And to get back to my main point....if ALL of this, was a reaction by chemicals (no matter how hard i find it to believe that different chemical reactions cause desert in some places, water in others, greenery in others, etc etc).....if all of this was caused by chemicals....then why have our scientists never been able to make even something as simple as a blade of grass out of chemicals alone?
Anyway....main question again....so as not to complicate things too much:
if everything was caused by mere chemical reactions....why have we NEVER been able to produce anything in science, the same as we see in nature?
Originally posted by Prot0n
Everything didn't happen 'on accident'. Another misconception from the unlearned creationist crowed.
We don't currently have a suitable answer to how life first arose or how DNA developed or what consciousness even is really. Yes, we being conscious beings can't even define our own consciousness.
Picture a flat rock and a rock with a bowl like depression. You tell me where water will collect readily.
You need to pay attention in school or read more up on science. Chemical reactions don't create desserts or water to collect in places where it would readily naturally collect.
Scientist's have been able to create primitive life in the lab before, and still do in a way.
You can't just slop a mess of chemicals together and expect it to readily create life
You REALLY should pay attention to science related discussion's and in school, and take the initiative to learn more about this stuff.
You seem to hold onto many misconceptions, and this is your main reason for not being able to answer your question's.
Science isn't some big evil let's destroy god operation.
Originally posted by geek101
Ok, this MIGHT be a stupid question
So i was thinking last night, and first off, i want to know, where exactly do evolutionists believe everything came from?
Do they think it was chemical reactions?
If so, how come those chemical reactions caused water in some areas, desert in others, grass in others. What about trees and flowers and all that? How did they come about? (i'm asking this to evolutionists)....
and if you believe everything natural on this earth came about via some reaction....then how come our scientists have never been able to recreate ANTHING from scratch (not even a blade of grass)
Also, according to you...where does all life on earth come from?
thanks
Mr Mxyztpllk wrote:
So these dogs, how did the DNA “know” that it has to produce more hair for the dog going north? How did it know how to grow bigger teeth? Where does all this information come from?
exactly!!
[edit on 12-6-2006 by geek101]
Originally posted by Heratix
2 short hairs breed and have 4 pups with short hair(only 1 grows to maturity because the cold kills the others)...its not DNA telling the hair its needed....its the lack of DNA not giving the short hairs a chance in there locality....whereas if they had gone south to warmer climes...it would be the hairy dog at dissadvantage and so it would likely die out in that locality...thats how it works IMO.
Originally posted by Heratix
thank you...you gave me a nice warm glow.