Well, its true, Bob. You turn on your own with the quickness when you see politcal gain and you do eat babies.

I'd say Bush supporters suffer from Selective Hearing at least, possibly they're all delusional?

The repugnants are fascists. Repuplican conservative government is fascist which uses its laws selectively and discriminatorily (i.e. double standard) against those who they despise.

I can relate it to an experience I had once.

A female friend of mine caught her leg on fire at a bonfire one evening, while we all exclaimed to her that her leg was burning. She swatted her hand at it, refusing to look at the issue screaming, NO ITS NOT, NO ITS NOT!

Which brings us back to the American people... Hey, George bush sucks cucumbers, while they fail to look at the evidence in their face, they swat you away screaming... NO HE DOESNT, NO HE DOESNT.

So yes, Denial is how I would describe the issue.

Originally posted by Colonel
The repugnants are fascists. Repuplican conservative government is fascist which uses its laws selectively and discriminatorily (i.e. double standard) against those who they despise.

its almost satanic.

The problem is (besides the fact they are retarded) that most people who voted for this a$$hole refuse to admit to themselves that they were wrong. So they will support anything just to prove to themselves that they were right in voting for this jacka$$!

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Colonel
The repugnants are fascists. Repuplican conservative government is fascist which uses its laws selectively and discriminatorily (i.e. double standard) against those who they despise.

its almost satanic.

!!!!

Originally posted by Ocelot
The problem is (besides the fact they are retarded) that most people who voted for this a$$hole refuse to admit to themselves that they were wrong. So they will support anything just to prove to themselves that they were right in voting for this jacka$$!

Praise Jesus (As the repugnants say).

The people have a social cancer or social desease. Its known as the republican party.

If you own a couple million in oil stocks the economy is great.

Wow, I kind of expected that there would be more people defending Bush in this topic. God knows about 3 months ago, the ratio of anti-bush and pro-bush postings in a topic like this would have been reversed...

Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
Wow, I kind of expected that there would be more people defending Bush in this topic. God knows about 3 months ago, the ratio of anti-bush and pro-bush postings in a topic like this would have been reversed...

I think the tide may be turning on ATS.

The Colonel is winning the war.....

Don't be so sure. In my experience it goes in waves, one side has the ascendant until the other has had enough, then they take the same place until the cycle repeats. Anyway, who wants a one sided board? Not me. There is nothing to be gained, learned, or indeed any fun to be had arguing with people that agree with you.

Originally posted by kegs
There is nothing to be gained, learned, or indeed any fun to be had arguing with people that agree with you.

I disagree, kegs. I like arguing with people that agree with me. I learn how to irritate, cajole, and test the boundaries on ignorance and stupidity issues that are so vital to us at ATS.

It's all in the art of nitpicking, proving your manhood and superiority, and being boss hog.

(Or at least, that's for the little guys, not me. You?)

Nice one, though I have to say I completely disagree...

Originally posted by Killuminati
Is there a psychological term for this? And does anybody else notice this?

It could be termed, "Denial syndrome". It's the trait of denying any evidence, no matter how compelling, that would lend falsity to one's beliefs.

...A lot of religious fanatics get this too...


I'm glad we don't see a whole lot of that here...We're suppossed to *deny* ignorance, not deny truth.

Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
He is my leader, my ELECTED leader.

Originally posted by Gazrok
He may be our leader, but he wasn't "elected"...

Got that right...He was *appointed*.

Originally posted by BeingWatchedByThem
please dont day you voted for gore, oh please..

I voted "No Confidence"...This basically means that there was no candidate worthy of my vote. With politics being the way it is, I haven't voted any different since I *started* voting, over 20 years ago.

Originally posted by Ocelot
I cant wait for colonel to get in on this thread.

It didn't take a Kryptonian intellect to realize that he'd just go on with "repugnant this", "repugnant that" & "repugnant the other thing"...

Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
God knows about 3 months ago, the ratio of anti-bush and pro-bush postings in a topic like this would have been reversed...

Even though some Bush supporters came in here to "discuss" (more like "disgust") us with their political views, there actually were *some* of them that decided to look & contemplate the evidence that we'd link 'em to...Then most of those who weren't already hopelessly brainwashed changed their minds about him.

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
I learn how to irritate, cajole, and test the boundaries on ignorance and stupidity issues that are so vital to us at ATS.

This sort of comes with the territory when you can learn how to question yourself & your own beliefs...After all, how can we learn anything new if we're not willing to adapt the old knowledge? The trick is for *you* to adapt the old knowledge without mistakenly adapting yourself to it.

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Ocelot
The problem is (besides the fact they are retarded) that most people who voted for this a$$hole refuse to admit to themselves that they were wrong. So they will support anything just to prove to themselves that they were right in voting for this jacka$$!

Praise Jesus (As the repugnants say).

Hmmm. Now you want to take shots at professing christians who just happen to be republican. A lot of slimy, vote grabbing, racist, thieving democrats praise Jesus too on Sundays...it seems that the vote count in the last election was fairly even??? No one voted their right mind??? They who voted AGAINST a repeat of the Clinton years were retarded??! I think Bush was just the object of the vote to oust the corrupted, malfeasance laden; sex absorbed and profane administration in American history. He was just the guy.

I don't fawn over Bush- I am conservative. The lesser of two evils maybe? Gore -sssssshhhhuuddder- would be doing what now as President.....egads! ..." I,- Al- Gore,- will do all- in MY power- to protect- the American people- from....who attacked us?..... the evil people."

How can you take a guy who talked to you like you were ten and had 'learning disability' stamped on your forehead'???

I hope, in a evil way, that Hitlary gets in just see the mularkey that is spewed on this board when she socializes your world just before the Peoples Repug of China owns D.C. If Al Gore hit Afghanistan to oust the Taliban (I like that), he would be praised as a HERO on this board for ridding the world of a a heinous regime; freeing women-NOW and Ms. Ireland bowing obseqeously at his feet in recognition of kingship-and giving men the freedom to vote and sing rock n' roll in public while farting.

Flip to the other side ok???

Yes, Bush supporters have serious psychological defects.

The main problem is they are like Bush in the regard that they think they can bomb innocent nations back to the stone-age for no good reason.

They are ruthless and cruel mostly because their
father(s) were mean to them.

i'm chiming in on this thread one last time.


using the logic some of you use here....then we all have psychological disorders in someone elses view. this doesnt make things so but i am amused to see people confusing opinions for facts. that and the fact some people have the ego to believe that having a certain opinion or view in a political sense makes them mental rejects is astounding to me. i expected more from people on this board than this. as some parents would say "i'm not mad, i'm just disappointed in you".

Originally posted by Killuminati

Is there a psychological term for this? And does anybody else notice this?
[Edited on 23-10-2003 by Killuminati]

I think you could call it mild retardation.