You must be the higher level if I'm to draw conclusions on what you've written? And what level would that be?
I was unaware that there are levels of freemasonry.
Mags
There are members posting at ATS who draw conclusions about the unique teachings of higher levels of Freemasonry from the writings of archaic writers
such as Albert Pike or Manly Hall. There are also members who are 33 degree Masons.
As a general (and genuine) guide:
1. Don't assume that the later degrees mean the same thing in all regions of the world. They are more readily attainable and require less devotion to
learning in some constitutions.
2. Look for some websites that explain the differences between the York Rite and the Antient and Accepted Scottish Rite to see the separate and
distinct (though not mutually exclusive) paths available to select Masons. Aside from those, there are opportunities for organisational advancement as
well without the "higher learning."
3. When someone believes that higher "levels" keep lower "levels" in the dark on issues of substance, ask for examples. You will not see any
forthcoming, and that is not because of the great mysteries purported to be in the exclusive domain of higher "levels". It's simply because the
organization doesn't have to function that way.