This topic is in the Board Business & Questions discussion forum.  (rss)


genuine?




Topic started on 28-10-2002 @ 09:44 AM by kim


The only thing that is bothering me is are these stories actually true and if so, how have ppl managed to obtain them?
If some1 can set me straight on this i would be very grateful



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2002 @ 07:27 AM by ~iluv2act~


Many are true. Some are not. It's why they call them conspiracy theories. Fact is, we don't know much for sure, although the articles on the main site do tend to stay away from the lunatic fringe...

Besides, if we knew everything, none of us geeks would have anything to theorize about...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2002 @ 10:29 AM by kim


yeah like George bush is really an alien from the future and the world will one day be ruled by guineapigs!
(ya reckon anyone'll buy it?)
How then, do you know when truth ends and reality begins?
like i heard this stuff about biotech where theyre making these robots have senses by implanting rat genes into it. I dont know what to think of that



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2002 @ 01:09 PM by Tyler


The ball is round, the game last 90 minutes. That's a fact. Everything else is a theory.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2002 @ 02:41 PM by John bull 1


Kim,I don't know about the rat genes in robots but I remember seeing earlier this year on a serious news programme experiments done with fish brains(I think)that were wired up to computers.The still conscious brain thought it was swimming and the screen showed you what the fish perceived.They found that the brains didn't survive very long(a few hours)
That is 100% true.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-10-2002 @ 02:14 AM by quaneeri


As far as conspiracies go.

Don't take anything at face value, a lot of it is just crap.

Obsorb what they have to say, and then research the topic using your search engine. (yahoo:google).

I have found out over the years that only about 50-percent of what you read is good hard facts.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-10-2002 @ 06:34 AM by kim


fish brains huh? interesting. which news programme was that?
The thing is (quaneeri) when you do research using google or whatever, whats to say that they're right? Guess the only way to know for sure is to be there
how do you join the CIA ? (lol)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-10-2002 @ 01:34 PM by Fry2





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-10-2002 @ 02:40 PM by John bull 1


OK,Not quite what I was looking for but pretty close.I will try and find the fish brain one though.

news.bbc.co.uk...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-11-2002 @ 05:31 PM by Inspectah


There is only one thing true in this world, that there is nothing true. Anyways, if you stay here long enough, you will learn to judge posts, this is a place of semi-skeptics, we are sensible, yet we still beleive the truth is out there...

get it?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2002 @ 01:08 AM by FreeMason


All I can say, is anything these nuts say about Free masonry, IT IS NOT TRUE

And for the last time, THE ILLUMINATI DON'T EXIST

Sincerely,
no signature



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2002 @ 05:28 AM by Thomas Crowne


Yes it is
Yes they do.
Take it to the secret societies forum if you'd like a crack at the two topics. They have both been beat slap to death, mind you.

[Edited on 2-11-2002 by Thomas Crowne]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2002 @ 08:35 PM by Estragon


There you are -half of them are true: you just have to decide which half.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-11-2002 @ 08:39 PM by Estragon


you'll find that the ever-decreasing fraction of postings that actually have anything remotely resembling "content" tend to come from "non-mainstream" media sources.
If you're lucky you'll get a brief commentary, perhaps a little criticism and a link.
If you're not you'll get a huge cut'n'paste and an invitation to submit comments regardless of their relevance.
Very, very, very occasionally you'll find a reference to "conspiracy" ( these you might enter in your diary)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:





































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.075 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread