 |
|
Topic started on 6-6-2006 @ 01:02 AM by infinite8
|
Weather modification is big business and quite common throughout China. Its government has a Weather Modification Office that strategically plans out
how often or how seldom it should rain. Though it is quite common to increase rainfall in areas such as Beiiing, as well as areas of agriculture, big
plans are in place to prevent the rain at the upcoming 2008 Olympic games.
www.cnn.com...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using an arsenal of rockets, artillery and aircraft, China will try to blast the clouds out of the sky, a meteorologist from Beijing told a Hong Kong
newspaper, through a technique which falls under the umbrella of "cloud seeding."......
By shooting shells containing chemicals like silver iodide, or dry ice into the sky, scientists say they can create rain.
..... the Weather Modification Office is charged with among other things, dousing the city with rain to get rid of pollution, sandstorms, hail and
fires and getting water to arid areas.
Just last Thursday the office claimed to have opened the heavens by firing off 163 cigarette-sized sticks and seven rockets into the sky, bringing as
much as 11.2 millimeters of water to a parched, dusty and polluted Beijing, in the heaviest rainfall so far this spring.
The United States started making rain in the 1950s, but later gave up because they could not work out whether the seeding produced more rain, Chan
said. China now boasts it is the world's leading rainmaker.
China's meteorological office has announced in its latest five-year plan it wants to produce more rain in the future.
And if all goes to plan, none of it will be falling when the Olympics will be held two years from now.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the United States there are many companies available for the right cost. Weather modification and cloud seeding companies are available for hire
across the USA.
I think more grants funding weather modification research should be provided by the US government. I would like to see research projects focusing on
proper rain management as well as for the prevention of tornados and hurricanes. I would also like this research to include the after effects on the
atmoshpere as a result.
This article is a good read, I suggest you take a moment and read it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-6-2006 @ 01:19 AM by ShadowXIX
|
Cloud seeding clearly works but has little effect unless you invested insane levels of equipment into it. A company in the US created this stuff
(dynogel I think ) non toxic powder that absorbs like 100x its weight in water and turns to a gel that is then broken down by sea water.
But to have any effect on say a hurricane you would need hundreds of C-5 galaxies full of the stuff all dumping it on the hurricane non stop.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-6-2006 @ 01:36 AM by infinite8
|
As far as hurricanes are concerned Ben Livingston begs to differ. He believes that it can be done relatively easy.
www.prisonplanet.com...
Cloud seeding concering the increase of rain is actually very effective without using insane levels of equiptment. China has been doing so, as quoted
in the article above, and many US companies provide the service with the use of an airplane.
Just last Thursday the office claimed to have opened the heavens by firing off 163 cigarette-sized sticks and seven rockets into the sky, bringing as
much as 11.2 millimeters of water to a parched, dusty and polluted Beijing, in the heaviest rainfall so far this spring.

|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-6-2006 @ 07:00 PM by chinawhite
|
They need to use this more often. In the northern areas like beijing or tianjin they get really dusty and has a large amount of pollution like smog in
the air. If anyone has been to beijing they'll know what i mean
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-6-2006 @ 07:12 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
|
According to some poepl and sources, the US government has and does use really advanced weather modification tech, like cloud busters and scalar
weapons. And some people believe thats what chemtrails are for too.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-6-2006 @ 03:20 AM by J_3
|
Is this not great news for people argueing the use of chem trails in US and britain? Atleast China isn't hiding this information.
Finally proof that the streaks that are always covering the sky in my town and grow to increased size, is not a fantasy, it is real and as far as I
know has not been disclosed to the people of the towns which take part in these activities.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-6-2006 @ 08:47 AM by infinite8
|
It is true that China is not hiding it, in fact, some provinces of China have sued others for stealing their rain. It is actually a far more common
and talked about practice. Certain states in the USA have been practicing cloud seeding for some time now.
from Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org...
-----------------------------------------------------
"In the United States, cloud seeding is used to increase precipitation in areas experiencing drought, to reduce the size of hailstones that form in
thunderstorms, and to reduce the amount of fog in and around airports. Cloud seeding is also occasionally used by major ski resorts to induce snow
fall. In January 2006, an $8.8 million cloud seeding project began in Wyoming to examine the effects of cloud seeding on snowfall over Wyoming's
Medicine Bow, Sierra Madre, and Wind River mountain ranges. [1]
A number of commercial companies, such as Aero Systems Incorporated [2], Atmospherics Incorporated [3], North American Weather Consultants [4] and
Weather Modification Incorporated [5] offer weather modification service centered around cloud seeding, and the USAF proposed its use on the
battlefield in 1996."
------------------------------------------------------
Other groups doing research include private firms as well as NOAA.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-6-2006 @ 04:31 PM by apc
|
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
According to some poepl and sources, the US government has and does use really advanced weather modification tech, like cloud busters and scalar
weapons. And some people believe thats what chemtrails are for too. 
You just had to do it...
IMO, screwing with the atmosphere intentionally is more dangerous than unintentionally. Localized weather modification is extremely small scale now.
But as understanding improves, this can eventually lead to global modification. Does that seem really bad to anyone else?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 02:38 AM by Kinesis
|
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Cloud seeding clearly works but has little effect unless you invested insane levels of equipment into it. A company in the US created this stuff
(dynogel I think ) non toxic powder that absorbs like 100x its weight in water and turns to a gel that is then broken down by sea water.
But to have any effect on say a hurricane you would need hundreds of C-5 galaxies full of the stuff all dumping it on the hurricane non stop.

Non-toxic powder, absorbs like 100x its weight? You've got to be kidding me! Water isn't the only thing cloud seeding absorbs. It's just a
matter of time when industrial pollution mixes in with these artificial cloud masses to produce a toxic rainfall, an acid sludge.
If I could choose a battle to stop something, I'd bet my life this one would be it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 05:08 AM by purplemonkey
|
i agree with the previous two posters altering weather will more than likely be unsustainable. sure it will be good short term but the long term
effects won't be positive.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 05:22 AM by Essan
|
Originally posted by infinite8
As far as hurricanes are concerned Ben Livingston begs to differ. He believes that it can be done relatively easy. 
And nearly everyone else disagrees
Originally posted by J_3
Is this not great news for people argueing the use of chem trails in US and britain? Atleast China isn't hiding this information. 
No. Unless they want to demonstrate their ignorance  Cloud seeding does not take place in clear skies nor does it occur at high altitude. it is
not carried out by commercial jets and is not visible in any way from the ground (partly because the cloud being seeded is in the way  )
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 09:45 PM by Kinesis
|
Originally posted by purplemonkey
i agree with the previous two posters altering weather will more than likely be unsustainable. sure it will be good short term but the long term
effects won't be positive. 
There's isn't enough long term data, but I believe there's enough evidence to conclude that silver ionized aerosols are a toxic way at covering up
urban air pollution. As a way to alleviate drout, would you want to drink water laced with silver? They already know the long-term harmful effects
of fluoride in drinking water, now low concentrations of silver if passed off as being safe? There is definitely something wrong with an aerosol that
absorbs 100x its own weight, by bonding with toxic pollutants like sulfur, lead and E-Coli bacteria that winds up in your soil and drinking water.
This is how bacteria will be transferred by cloud seeding:
Bioaerosol characterization
The following link is misleading. You're told that cloud seeding will alleviate drout, while at the same time "it may be an exaggeration to
attribute all of the increase to cloud seeding". It seems a huge waste of resources with more than 3,800 rocket launchers, about 7,000 antiaircraft
guns and many airplanes, at the expense of 413 million yuan (US$49 million).
China's attempt at alleviating drout
Cloud Seeding Fails to Ease Drought
How Pollution Suppresses Rain
Soil silver content of agricultural areas
They assume that there won't be high enough concentrations of silver in the soil, while at the same time they acknowledge its harmful effects. Now
you tell me what scientists are the hypocrites. Lack of long-term research makes even these scientists guilty!
THE SILVER ION IS AMONG THE MOST TOXIC OF HEAVY METAL IONS, PARTICULARLY TO MICROORGANISMS AND TO FISH. THE EASE WITH WHICH AG FORMS INSOLUBLE
COMPOUNDS, HOWEVER, REDUCES ITS IMPORTANCE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANT. AG IS NOT LIKELY TO CONCENTRATE TO HARMFUL LEVELS THROUGH EITHER
TERRESTRIAL OR AQUATIC FOOD CHAINS. THERE IS SOME POSSIBILITY THAT AG FROM CLOUD SEEDING WILL RETARD GROWTH OF ALGAE, FUNGI, BACTERIA, AND FISH IN
FRESH WATER
EC
OLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SILVER IODIDE
Nobody can honestly say that cloud seeding is anywhere near safe!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 09:53 PM by adkchamp
|
i bet you that they are the ones causing global warming lolol
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 01:01 AM by purplemonkey
|
Originally posted by Kinesis
There's isn't enough long term data 
yeah it was just an assumptions i made based on the fact that pretty much every time man kind has intervened or interrupted the natural order it ends
in a worse situation of us and the environment
but i guess that is human nature... like smith said we are a virus to this planet. lol
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 06:40 AM by StellarX
|
On specifics or in terms of vague generalities about how 'impossible' it is?
When some people speak it's ALL they do but even the brightest have their moments.
 Cloud seeding does not take place in clear skies nor does it occur at high altitude. it is not carried out by commercial jets and is not
visible in any way from the ground (partly because the cloud being seeded is in the way  ) 
As i remember you do not in fact need a cloud to create rain clouds but i won't argue that it isn't far more efficient or a good general standard.
 You can no more prove that no spraying ( tests of biological and chemical releases do happen) are taking place from any planes that you will have
success at proving that no commercial aircraft has ever been modified to release substances other than what regular propulsion would require. Why
bother making a claim that is entirely indefensible?
Stellar
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 06:45 AM by StellarX
|
The idea behind scientific inquiry is after all to explain what has been or is being observed...
 IMO, screwing with the atmosphere intentionally is more dangerous than unintentionally. 
Why? Don't you think humanity could benefit in general if we could at some point in the future regulate our climate as we saw fit? Why would that be
a bad thing?
 Localized weather modification is extremely small scale now. 
Well we have been able to intesify or deintensify hurricanes since at least the 60's so unless that qualifies as 'small scale' i would have to
disagree with you.
 But as understanding improves, this can eventually lead to global modification. Does that seem really bad to anyone else? 
Nope. If we can chop down entire forest and pollute vast river systems while hunting to extinction many species we can just as well try to manage the
global climate and see if we can negate some of the damage by such means. Sure it's going to be abused but so can everything else.!
Stellar
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 09:24 AM by Kinesis
|
Originally posted by StellarX
Why? Don't you think humanity could benefit in general if we could at some point in the future regulate our climate as we saw fit? Why would that be
a bad thing?
Nope. If we can chop down entire forest and pollute vast river systems while hunting to extinction many species we can just as well try to manage the
global climate and see if we can negate some of the damage by such means. Sure it's going to be abused but so can everything else.!

I don't know if you really don't mean what you're writing and you're being sarcastic, or if you're serious. The intensity and frequency of
hurricanes and tornados is natures way of ridding the upper atmosphere of foreign pollutants. Air currents near the stratosphere already move at
great velocities. When these air masses at the top meet with the warmer air masses on the ground, this manifests in destructive centirugal weather
patterns. Nature did not intend to have stagnant smog clouds loom overhead, nor did nature intend for factories, smelters and oil refineries to
bellow huge amounts of exhaust fumes into the atmosphere.
It's assumed that silver ionized aerosol techniques will provide a quick fix to decades of unabated pollution. Guess what, that assumption is the
worst possible guess anybody could have come up with.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 09:39 AM by Essan
|
Originally posted by StellarX
Why bother making a claim that is entirely indefensible?
Stellar 
Because, as I'm sure you well know, I was referring to known, conventional, cloud seeding - as carried out by the Chinese, Russians and a number of
private companies in the USA, Australia and elsewhere. Not hypothetical secret experiments  So it is entirely defensible
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-4-2008 @ 12:55 PM by StellarX
|
Originally posted by Kinesis
I don't know if you really don't mean what you're writing and you're being sarcastic, or if you're serious. The intensity and frequency of
hurricanes and tornados is natures way of ridding the upper atmosphere of foreign pollutants. 
I am quite serious and according to who does nature know what to do with 'foreign' pollutants?
 Air currents near the stratosphere already move at great velocities. 
You don't say?
 When these air masses at the top meet with the warmer air masses on the ground, this manifests in destructive centirugal weather patterns.

And?
 Nature did not intend to have stagnant smog clouds loom overhead, nor did nature intend for factories, smelters and oil refineries to bellow
huge amounts of exhaust fumes into the atmosphere. 
As far as i can tell there is little evidence to suggest that nature either subjectively or objectively care; to do that it would have to be sentient
and i am not aware that it is.
 It's assumed that silver ionized aerosol techniques will provide a quick fix to decades of unabated pollution. Guess what, that assumption
is the worst possible guess anybody could have come up with. 
Why is it the worse possible and who suggested it was a guess? Why do you think chemtrails have anything to do with pollution control?
Stellar
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |