Why are scientists stealing our electricity?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 5-6-2006 @ 08:51 AM by cmdrkeenkid
While I will agree that a lot of Tesla's workings are being withheld, you also have to keep in mind that he, himself destroyed a lot of his work for fear it would be used for nefarious purposes.

As for Faraday? A lot of his workings are used in the modern world. The main example would be the
Faraday Cage. There's also his law of induction, his invention of the dynamo, and discovered the laws of ectrolysis, to name a few more.

As for the other claims you staked, could you provide links backing them up? The one you provided about the Grand Canyon being created by an electrical discharge doesn't say anything about that happening.

You mentioned one article, but you didn't say anything about it other than you "know of" it. Does it answer the questions you posed, or did it pose them, or what?

[edit on 6/5/2006 by cmdrkeenkid]


reply posted on 8-6-2006 @ 10:56 AM by Long Lance
That's OT now, but why not, it's remotely on topic when you consider that plate tectonics was once thought of as a fringe theory...


Originally posted by Thousand

Please don't forget to research before you post.

Sources of Plate Motion covered in the Tectonic Theory



Now i understand it all . maybe i shouldn't have said 'don't attempt' because they surely do, but i have a huge problem with 'deep mantle convections'.

Source

Current research considers the motion of the crust associated with plate tectonics as the surface manifestation of a much deeper mantle circulation.


Consider the Hawaiian hotspot, its position relative to the crust is undoubtedly moving, if the mantle moved along with the crust, as this model would imply, then it would a) have to cut through thousands of miles of rock instead of just a few miles and b) maintain precise alignment to something else (the core??), an unlikely event, barring magick, of course.

Even your original link mentioned 'hotspot reference', so the concept is apparently accepted. That said, what i posted may have been sweeping and partially incorrect, but i doubt casual research would have changed my general view on the subject or the overall content of my original post...

PS: note that i am not writing with any authority, so this post is provided 'as is' - just food for thought.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 12 days ago with 77 member flags
WARNING: 3D TV\'s Possibly Causing Strokes and Vision Loss
  Posted 18 days ago with 27 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 14 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 13 days ago with 19 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags
Big Oil Vs. Plasma Battery Technology - Guess who is winning?
  Posted 11 days ago with 14 member flags
Unified Theory Visual Model Draft ver.9
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags