Originally posted by LeftBehind
Well you certainly said that. But I fail to see how you proved this assertion.
Do you have proof of this?
Or should we just take your word for it?
Read my posts and dispute the evidence used to make the assertion.
There really is no true debate here. I post observations and assumptions far more logical and far more possible than the NIST, PM, FEMA or 9/11
Comission and all you can do is respod with "prove it"?
The NIST has proven NOTHING.
PM and FEMA have proven NOTHING.
the 9/11 Comisssion has proven NOTHING.
How? They actually got to SEE the evidence.
Now the evidence has been DESTROYED or supressed and no one will ever get to see it.
In short, they couldn't prove it WITH evidence yet you want me to PROVE it without?
All any of these groups do is make observations and attempt to come up with the most plausible theory of what occured within their acceptable
parameters. If they cannot produce PROOF, that is a SMOKING GUN, how can I? One would think they would at least produce some warped steel or
something.
All I can do is point out how their observations make no sense from a physical and logical stand point.
I have done that. You are ignoring it by asking me to do the impossible.