It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tmac100
You are not on my side: you are on theirs.
Originally posted by tmac100
you ignored my request for even usage of the term in our textbooks, our lives, even the Google Archives system as compared to when Bush arrived. You merely returned and repeated the lie.
Originally posted by tmac100You will persist till damnation day, but you cannot tell me that even in my textbooks as I was growing up through elementary and high school as compared to now that this concern was even around. That's why you guys insist we must give up that "mentality" where we sat back and knew the government was protecting us till we were able to laugh at terrorist threats until Bush came.
Originally posted by tmac100
On my website is shown dialogues that show your accusations are monotonous and well-planned.
By the 1990s, people were crying terrorism whenever they discerned an attempt at intimidation or disruption. Hackers who concocted computer viruses were cyberterrorists, cult leaders were psychological terrorists.
source: www.cdi.org...
Through the 1960s and 1970s, the numbers of those groups that might be described as terrorist swelled to include not only nationalists, but those motivated by ethnic and ideological considerations. The former included groups such as the Palestinian Liberation Organization (and its many affiliates), the Basque ETA, and the Provisional Irish Republican Army, while the latter comprised organizations such as the Red Army Faction (in what was then West Germany) and the Italian Red Brigades. As with the emergence of modern terrorism almost a century earlier, the United States was not immune from this latest wave, although there the identity-crisis-driven motivations of the white middle-class Weathermen starkly contrasted with the ghetto-bred malcontent of the Black Panther movement
In July 1985, former United States President Ronald Reagan addressed the American Bar Association on the subject of terrorism.............
President Reagan’s tirade was provoked by a spectacular plane hijack at Beirut Airport which had occurred a few days earlier.
Originally posted by tmac100What would have happened if, in response to terrorism we are being lied to always existed, from the beginning, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin told us we were subject to arrest and detainment on an accusation without charge or due process because they failed to protect us?
Originally posted by tmac100
Don't evade or ignore this question anymore Crakeur:
Originally posted by tmac100
Since you claim terrorism was always around despite your own party telling us about a New Day or situation that has arisen that requires different principles, and you are saying that Bush policies are the most effective...
Originally posted by tmac100
Are you telling us that when the Constitution was first penned, the American people should have been informed that they are subject to arrest and detainment indefinitely without charge or due process by any president that fails to protect them?
Originally posted by tmac100
I keep hearing all this junk about the USS Cole, etc.
Those things to us were more acts of war. We always had acts of war.
Originally posted by tmac100
Are you saying that since Bush policies is the most effective against terrorism and terrorism was always around, the Constitution was outdated the day it was created and the American forefathers were supposed to have told us that we must expect to be detained and imprisoned forever without due process if a president fails to protect us?
Originally posted by tmac100
It is clear President Bush doesn't care about his reputation. Isn't it safe to say that everyone else who comes from the Inquisitions don't?