It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bush Tops List As U.S. Voters Name Worst President, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Reagan, Clinton Top List As Best In 61 Years
Strong Democratic sentiment pushes President George W. Bush to the top of the list when American voters pick the worst U.S. President in the last 61 years. Bush is named by 34 percent of voters, followed by Richard Nixon at 17 percent and Bill Clinton at 16 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today. Leading the list for best President since 1945 is Ronald Reagan with 28 percent, and Clinton with 25 percent.
President Bush is ranked worst by 56 percent of Democrats, 35 percent of independent voters and 7 percent of Republicans, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. Best ranking for Reagan comes from 56 percent of Republicans, 7 percent of Democrats and 25 percent of independent voters. Among American voters 18 - 29 years old, Clinton leads the "best" list with 40 percent.
Among young voters, 42 percent list Bush as worst. Clinton tops the "worst" list among white Protestants - 24 percent, and white evangelical Christians - 29 percent.
More...
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I think time will prove GW to be much better than he is currently judged.
Reagan had an ability to project a kindly image, and was well liked personally by virtually everyone who knew him, apparently. But it always struck me that he was a mean man. I remember learning, in the late 1960s, of the impact Michael Harrington's The Other America had had on Johnson's War on Poverty. Harrington demonstrated that in the early 1960s there was still hunger in places like Appalachia, deriving from poverty. It was hard for middle class Americans to believe, and Lyndon Johnson, who represented many poor people himself, was galvanized to take action.
In foreign policy, Reagan abandoned containment of the Soviet Union as a goal and adopted a policy of active roll-back. Since the Soviet Union was already on its last legs and was not a system that could have survived long, Reagan's global aggressiveness was simply unnecessary.
The argument that Reagan's increases in military funding bankrupted the Soviets by forcing them to try to keep up is simply wrong. Soviet defense spending was flat in the 1980s.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
Comparatively speaking, the economy is far better off today than at most points in US history. But that doesn't matter if the target is someone the left doesn't like.
Please educate me at what point in the US history the national debt and trade deficit were at the levels we are unfortunate enough to witness today? Huh?
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
George Bush is a Warren Harding type president in my opinion.
Don't try to say congress is the problem for the debt. This is a republican party run country for now. He is the undisputed leader of it.
George Bush is respsonisble for massive spending and massive tax cuts.
(which we got a couple hundred dollar check ooooowwwww wowwwwww, and the real tax cut went to the rich.)
and the real tax cut went to the rich. . . . Which equals massive debt.
At least Bill Clinton was fiscally responsible, and we has record surpluses.
George Bush is responisble for invading Iraq under, how do we say, very cheesy lies. But blames it on faulty intelligence....
So because of that three of my family members have been to Iraq.
I feel George Bush had an opportunity to be a great president, and he blew it. George "the decider" Bush has been the worst president in my lifetime.
You have voted dr_strangecraft for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by sbob
Let me put it this way. I feel if you are rich in this country you should pay a little bit more in taxes. . . . . I'm not talking socialist, but fair.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
I'm advocating an economic viewpoint here that has practically gone extinct in the U.S.
You have voted dr_strangecraft for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by sbob
And your trickle down economics is not good. Trickle down economics is wealthy parents trickling down to their children.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
What you'll discover is, most of the children of millionaires fall back into the middle class by the time they are in their 50's---
Originally posted by loam
for the vast majority of the 2nd generation I would have thought more like in their 30's.
Of course, I think the problem with discussions like this is that the definition of "wealth" is so subjective.