It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pedophiles Launch Own Political Party In The Netherlands

page: 5
2
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2006 @ 07:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe
I dont know if this has been brought up, but they also want to support bestiality.


How can you have consensual sex with an animal? If it wags its tail it is OK? What if it doesn´t have a tail?

This party is fringe...




posted on May, 31 2006 @ 09:16 AM
link   
as everyone is getting uptight - you do know that the AOC is lower in 3 states in the usa than in the netherlands??

missouri and iowa is 14 - and south carolina its 12 if the couple is married!!


AND

canada is 12 also!!

www.avert.org...


read it people - learn before you start flaming other countries



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 09:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by HardToGet

Originally posted by dgtempe
I dont know if this has been brought up, but they also want to support bestiality.


How can you have consensual sex with an animal? If it wags its tail it is OK? What if it doesn´t have a tail?

This party is fringe...
That's directly from Steve, E.D. & Brian's Faux show this morning. I think with the animals, they just take 'em.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 09:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Harlequin
canada is 12 also!!

www.avert.org...


That's false.

It's 14.

It was once 12, but that was over a century ago (1890, at which time it was raised to 14).

Read it here.

There is, however, an exception for those "close in age" whereby a

a 12 or 13 year old can consent to engage in sexual activity with another person who is less than two years older and with whom there is no relationship of trust, authority or dependency.




Read here.

So, while a 12 or 13 year old can consent, they can only do so with someone less than 2 years older then themselves. This is not an age of consent, but an exception. As stated previously, Canada's age of consent is 14 for non-exploitative sexual relationships, and no relationships of trust, authority or dependancy. Otherwise, the age of consent is

18 years for where the sexual activity involves exploitative activity, such as prostitution, pornography or where there is a relationship of trust, authority or dependency.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 11:07 AM
link   
I think I wanna puke....
This is the sickest load of crap I have ever heard. I put these losers right up there with murderers. What the hell is wrong with the world today ?!?!?! I have a 4yr old daughter and I swear to god if some grown man was trying to pick her up when she was 12 he would end up hanging from his ....... off a high wall !! I am sure any sane father would agree !



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Disgusting, they will fail horribly



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 12:01 PM
link   
This is sick, twisted and abusing democracy.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Harlequin
as everyone is getting uptight - you do know that the AOC is lower in 3 states in the usa than in the netherlands??
read it people - learn before you start flaming other countries

(quote shortened for relevance)

I have in no way flamed any other country in any of the posts i have made here. I have flamed, and i admit it, the sick minded individuals who want this party to become known.

I know other countries have a low age for sexual consent. This thread is about a group of people (term used loosely) who want to carry out their activities legally.

This party is not about consent. It is about pedophiles who want to make it legal to to sexually abuse children. Nothing more.
If people cannot see this, then they must be seriously blinkered.

A pedophile is attracted to underage children to engage them in sex for their own satisfaction. Underage, being pre-pubescent. Look it up. There are plenty of sites that will tell you the same thing.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 12:40 PM
link   
oh i know very well what a pedofile is - but is it a pedofile that can marry in SC to a 12 year old girl? and she could have achild by him before she is 13?



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 01:22 PM
link   
There are many who hold beliefs opposed to homosexuality, and regard homosexuality with the disdain seen here for pedophilia. They are often scoffed at as being conservative. I for one believe it is the liberal mindset which is, for the most part, open to such sexual behavior. Indeed, the lesbian/homosexual lifestyle has been said to be but a mere step on the path to societal degradation by some, of which pedophilia, and bestiality are the end result.

For instance....NAMBLA--the North American Man-Boy Love Association

www.narth.com...

And I am sure there are many who will have a difficult time digesting these things, though pedophilia should come as no surprise, in fact, I am amazed at the outcry here.

www.frc.org...

Hideous as it may seem, Necrophilia may very well be found on the same pathway to sexual degradation.

www.crimelibrary.com...



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 02:06 PM
link   
What is the confusion? It looks pretty clear cut to me.

I'll put it this way.

It is like starting a political party for bank robbers. There is a difference between civil rights and criminal activities. The two don't match. They aren't even in the fruit family.




posted on May, 31 2006 @ 04:59 PM
link   
May Allah's Sword of Justice chop these devils heads.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Matyas
It is like starting a political party for bank robbers. There is a difference between civil rights and criminal activities. The two don't match. They aren't even in the fruit family.


You're talking about Bush republican's party right? A political party of bank robbers who don't know the difference between civil rights and criminals activities?? Who don't care for the lives of people??

This party and the Bush Co. party isn't different, they both are scum.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo
This party and the Bush Co. party isn't different, they both are scum.


Confound it Vitchilo, you know what I mean.

Even though your argument has semblence of truth it is still a stretch to connect the two in the same thread. I wasn't even thinking about the Bush Admin. when I posted my example.



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 06:19 PM
link   
2 points here.

1- Don't confuse conservatives with the Bush crowd. They ARE different.

2- What does this have to do with the topic?



posted on May, 31 2006 @ 06:41 PM
link   
As I've done lately...let the dust settle and try to find out 'who' is behind these kind of outrages. Paedophiles 'out in the open' for all to see goes totally against their sick inate nature. Who's funding this ????????



posted on Jun, 1 2006 @ 01:37 AM
link   
Anyone here from SC? its in your constitution for sex at 14.


anyone here from Iowa? you can have a 12 year old bride that can have a baby before she`s 13.

think before you judge other countries.



posted on Jun, 1 2006 @ 03:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tamahu
May Allah's Sword of Justice chop these devils heads.


Tamaho, don't even go there... know that some of the members on this site are Muslim, and your flippant (and insensitive comment) may be deemed offending, but aside from that, will reflect poorly on you.



posted on Jun, 1 2006 @ 03:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo
You're talking about Bush republican's party right?


Quote w/o comment:


Originally posted by TheBandit795
Mod Edit: Please read this IMMEDIATELY. And more than once.

The End of Political Baiting and Sniping on ATS


Please be careful, no sense in getting banned over something like this right?



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 03:06 PM
link   
My first reaction to the idea of pedophiles setting up a politcal party(just saw it on BBC), was to laugh.

And unlike some people here, i think that they probably are idiots to have done it.

The vast majority of the dutch seem to want to crush them out of existence



The point about people in the past having done it due to lower life expectancies is interesting though. Our cultures override a lot of our instincts, but where instincts are concerned, they can be primitive things(like our eating the wrong kinds of food, or in too large quantities and getting fat... because the controlling instincts are primitive)

Pedophilia might well be a natural variation of sexual desire, left over by our evolution, just like homosexuality(something that we mostly accept these days).

Also, if i recall correctly, Juliet in the original Romeo and Juliet play was supposed to be 13(makes it easier for me to swallow the stupid behavior
)

... That doesn't mean that we should accept pedophiles today.
Just because something exists naturally, doesn't mean that it's a good thing, or in any way beneficial to the society.

Personally, i often have trouble relating to people more than a few years younger.
It's a matter of intelligence and being able to decently talk to the person for me. It's not really that way for most other people that i know. A lot of people only need to see big boobs
... In a way that makes me different from the majority




Incidentally, i read the articles 'pazlenchantinrocks' gave links for.

It seems that pedophilia might not be directly harmful to all children, except in how society later reacts. The pleasure they experienced being portrayed to them as something to be guilty over. Also, it seems that in some cases the adults are approached by the children


... I'm suddenly having a recollection of this really attractive teacher i had, back when i was 13-14-ish
.....




Hmmm..... i think that the solution to be the problem may lie in our local brain-washing centers (aka schools
).

Kids could be taught the original reasoning behind our primitive and no longer useful instincts, possibly giving reference to animals, and then taught how to behave more sensibly when they face such situations. Eventually, when they grow up they'll hopefully do less stupid things.
(assuming of course, that the adults tasked with judging redundant variations of instincts and emotions, actually make the right calls and don't manage to suppress instincts useful for our survival
)

[edit on 2-6-2006 by Karsus]



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join