 |
|
Topic started on 28-5-2006 @ 08:57 PM by FredT
|
The tiny city of Hercules (poulation 24,000) has voted to use the Eminent Domaine law to seize 17+ acres owned by Walmart to prevent the retail giant
from placing a store in thier community. Historicaly "big box" retailers have used the process to force thier way in to communities, but now it
seems that the hunters have become the hunted.
If this holds up it could spark a wave of this all over the US. Its interesting that the law is being used against big business this time around.
See the story here
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 09:38 PM by TONE23
|
HAHA excellent!
I always love seeing the little people sticking it to "the man" But seriously,
One of my biggest arguements that I have had about the new Eminent Domain laws is that they cater to big business at the expense of the common
man.
And I really love this part
 "To use eminent domain is such an abuse of the process," said Rex Hime, president of the California Business Properties Association, which
represents large retailers.
Boy they really dont like the law working against them when they spent so much time and money lining the pockets of the politricksters that made these
insane laws.
Way to go Hercules, California!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 09:39 PM by tom goose
|
this at first seemed like a victory, but it is really just a snobby town that doesnt want to be labled poor, but rather an upscale suburban
quiteville. im sure when it comes to property take-overs, walmart knows its stuff, but now they are probably questioning wether it would be
profitable given the responce from the comunity.
for some reason the city of vancouver b.c has also decided to aviod walmarts big boxes. although their image is far from quite and suburban, they
still prefure small buisnesses over big. mind you this was before our new conservative govrenment stepped in. i guess we will wait and see.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 10:05 PM by Djarums
|
 
Major thumbs up to them. It's nice to see Eminent Domain used for its intended purpose. See, eminent domain allows the government to seize land for
use that benefits the people. Unfortunately eminent domain has been used to crap on the people as far back as anyone can remember. So, if the town
doesn't want a store that treats its employees like garbage and destroys all local businesses, good for them!!! Their elected government excercised
eminent domain for the good of its people.
Beautiful beautiful beautiful.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 10:39 PM by FredT
|
Originally posted by tom goose
this at first seemed like a victory, but it is really just a snobby town that doesnt want to be labled poor,

Its actually mislabled as Hercules is much more blue collar than it was made out to be in the story. You want snobby in the Bay Area, come on over to
Palo Alto. Also, the city of Mountain View (also in the Bay Area) where a 3br 2 ba 1300 sq. home built in 1950 will run you 900K+ did allow a Walmart
so snobbery played little part in it IMHO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 11:28 PM by TONE23
|
thanks for the follow up on this point.
btw FredT -great signature and avatar
Bob marley is one of the most prophetic people of the 21st century IMHO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 11:36 PM by tom goose
|
doesn't that seem weird though. what sounds like a town exclusive to those that have money, builds a big box store that the residence might not shop
at for trend reasons.
i dont know the area, is there a booming real estate economy?
they would not allow a big box wal-mart here in vancouver b.c that has seen similar if not higher property prices than you speak of. this town is
very trendy, it is very expensive, i think that is why more people keep coming here from all over the world, and that is the way city hall likes
it.
wal-marts in the areas are located in the poorer cities surrounding vancounver like New Westminister, and Surrey, which are the two poorest
neighboring cities.
a new skytrain is beeing built here for the olypics coming in 2010, and instead of runnin the line right down an existing unused track, that ran
through an upscale neighborhood, they are going to tie up traffic and destroy a beautifull boulevard running down a cheaper neighborhood. not because
they didn't want to offend the people that had a little more money, but because that is where they would get the most fairs.
The skytrain is the same as Walmart, they will usually be put where they will get the most use.
there is no mention of the publics responce to this in the article. is city hall speaking for the residence and what is a current trend they want to
see continue, or is this mearly a future projection of what things could be like. if it is the later then it is fair game, but if there is a current
fashion to the city image then wallmart has no right to step in, and sweet move with the Eminent Domain claim. i have no idea what it is but it
sounds like it russled some feathers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2006 @ 11:41 PM by Djarums
|
I really think it's unfair to ignore two points that I've raised before.
Wal Mart is a company well known for mistreating their employees, and for relentlessly driving local businesses into the ground.
Would you think for a moment that this might be the reason a small town finally stood up and said "Stay Away" rather than some sort of snobbery?
Sorry, I think the snob aspect is so far off base it risks falling off completely.
While I live in New York City, I do go to upstate New York fairly frequently during the summer months and what I see upstate is a massive Wal Mart, a
massive Home Depot and absolutely not one mom & pop store that used to be all over the place. They were driven into bankruptcy. As for the
employees? Typically a group of people who don't get treated particularly well, don't get any insurance and with the help of god don't stay there
very long.
I think it is a horrible mistake to believe people don't want WalMart because they think they're "too good" for it. Because if you really think
about it, while adding convenience for shoppers it devastates other aspects of life for the community.
[edit on 5-28-2006 by Djarums]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 12:33 AM by FredT
|
Originally posted by tom goose
i dont know the area, is there a booming real estate economy?
wal-marts in the areas are located in the poorer cities surrounding vancounver like New Westminister, and Surrey, which are the two poorest
neighboring cities.

Part of it you hit on the head. I am very very familiar with Vancouver and the surrounding area. My Uncles's "Winter residence" is in the hills of
West Vancouver which speaks volumes towards hit relative net worth. It would make sence in a big city area like Vancouver to locate such shops to the
suburbs which can and do have cheaper real estate prices.
To give you an idea the median price of a home in Santa Clara County (Which Mountain View resides) is about 760,000. Mountian View runs about 850,000
or so
Hurcules in COntra Costa Country as of January 2005 (best stats I could find had a median price of $529,000.00) Figure at best 20% above that. SO
relative affluence of a community may not have anything to do with the rejection.
Also rich people by and large are thrifty people and save money where they can (The hilton sisters are an exception) so they will go where the best
prices are. It also would be a case of "the rich getting richer" as the WalMart siphons off customers from other areas the taxes it generates for
the city would go up as well.
Link
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 01:17 AM by tom goose
|
"It's the quality of living in Hercules that we're dealing with," said Steve Kirby, a Hercules resident since 1988. "One thing that we don't
want is a regional-type business in there that brings in a lot of traffic."
sorry, i dont know how to use external quotes, but this was in the article, and i used it to base my opinion.
this sounds like a quiet town, like west vancouver Fred T?
they dont particularily like outsiders, people they dont know doing u-turns in their cul-de-sac's.
like you said FredT, the rich didn't get rich without chasing deals. the residence of Hurcules are likely going to drive to what ever town is
sufuring from the traffic in the "regional-type businessa" areas to shop at a store they never aproved to be built in their own community. kinda
hipocrtical, IMHO.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 02:11 AM by forestlady
|
Hercules is a blue-collar town and is not "snobby". They don't want WalMart for the same reason that every other town that has voted no on WalMart
does; they want to encourage Mom & Pop businesses and they don't like the policies of WalMart.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 04:06 AM by dgtempe
|
This happens in Cape Cod all the time. They wont allow any chain stores this side of the bridge with the exception of KMart.
Mom & Pop stores, and artists are big here and is a draw to our economy. I cant say i blame them, in a way.
I do travel to Walmart- some 25 miles away for the cheap thrills.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 11:37 AM by clearwater
|
Emminent domain, the phrase is reminiscent of manifest destiny.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 12:06 PM by Bibliophile
|
FredT, thank you for posting this item. I had caught a whiff of it in passing, but did not know the entire story.
I think it is great that people are fighting W-M. Using eminent domain, itself a huge issue in recent months, was very clever.
Go Hercules!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2006 @ 04:05 PM by jsobecky
|
From the main article:
 The area is the centerpiece of Hercules' redevelopment effort, which aims to create a destination on par with high-end Sausalito across the bay.
That would complement Hercules' plan to market itself as an "anti-suburb" with new neighborhoods appealing to home buyers nostalgic for
old-fashioned residential areas within cities.
A similar development is being built here; supposedly almost 50% of the homes are already sold before ground has even been broken. And the small
business element is wait-listed.
If Hercules has a Master Plan that included this type of development, I say more power to them. The "public good" element of eminent domain should
embrace quality of life as well as tax revenues, imo.
WalMart can build in one of the other, more welcoming cities listed in the aticle. The shoppers from Hercules will still drive there to shop, believe
me.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2007 @ 10:49 PM by kaptain disfunct
|
when i first heard about this i had hoped that it would get other towns thinking about doing the same thing.... but, no.
the way wal-mart treats its employees isn't a secret. its sad that so many people are unemployed that they are completely willing to take a wal-mart
into their community
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2007 @ 10:55 PM by djohnsto77
|
I still think eminent domain should be restricted just to a real public need, such as a school, bridge, etc. I don't support using it to usurp land
neither for nor from business. Zoning laws can be used to prevent a big-box store from occupying a certain area of land anyway, can't they?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2007 @ 11:01 PM by rocknroll
|
I'd love to see the world go back to Mom and Pop dimestores like it was when I was a kid growing up..........so much nicer back then. Not like
today.
I'd also love to see Walmart, K-Mart, and Target topple.
I miss the shopping era of the 1960-1970's.
And malls need to go too.........they draw too many loitering troublemakers nowadays.
Over the last decade Baltimore has had a major rise in crime in malls. Shootings, murders, etc.......not just shoplifting. I don't remember this at
all when I was young.
In Baltimore, you have a shopping choice....the throngs of trash that shop at huge superstores (sorry if it sounds snobby, but it's true), or young
punk thugs and their homies that hang out at malls.
My Dad has a theory that if we go back to the small town stores these types won't bother if they don't have the convenience of shopping cheap/in
bulk, and indoors (the malls). They'd find other places to congregate (hopefully in their own Mom & Pop shopping district), and shopping would resume
to the pleasant experience it use to be during yesteryear. Ahhh, the good ol' days........
[edit on 8-1-2007 by rocknroll]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |