|
reply posted on 15-8-2006 @ 03:03 PM by MrMorden
|
There could be a legitimate reason such patents are kept out of public view.
For example, let's say there is some fancy zero point energy generator that liberates energy from the quantum vacuum, and can be used to power all
sorts of devices with no fuel, no moving parts, and no byproducts. A dream come true, give one to everybody, right?
Not so fast...what if there is SO much energy available through the device, that it can easily be turned into something that generates an uncontrolled
reaction that makes Hiroshima look like a firecracker? And what if the principle of operation is so simple that anybody with a little electrica
knowledge could cause the device to do that?
You start passing these things out, it's like putting a nuke in every home in the US (or the world)...I like people, but I don't think I'd trust
them with that.
The point is, not every reason for keeping something secret is a sinister reason.
[edit on 15-8-2006 by MrMorden]
[edit on 15-8-2006 by MrMorden]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-8-2006 @ 06:20 PM by PLeasant
|
"Not so fast...what if there is SO much energy available through the device, that it can easily be turned into something that generates an
uncontrolled reaction that makes Hiroshima look like a firecracker? And what if the principle of operation is so simple that anybody with a little
electrica knowledge could cause the device to do that?"
Uhmmm......If a little electrical knowledge is all that's necessary then anyone who really wants to use it for evil can do that anyway.
Besides with gas prices the way they are personally I'll take that risk.
You are missing the point man, they are suppressing any technology they don't manufacture or have a hand in supplying. Go to
waterpoweredcar.com... and read the part about how all the new hybrids are totally inefficiant on purpose. It's all about them selling you the
hydrogen tanks once you purchase the car. So you still have to pay the major manufacters' if you want to travel. You see what got Stan killed was
that it took them almost completely out of the loop. Not to mention he didn't need them to manufacter the kit. It's a crying shame.
[edit on 16-8-2006 by PLeasant]
[edit on 16-8-2006 by PLeasant]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-8-2006 @ 11:42 AM by Long Lance
|
Originally posted by MrMorden
Not so fast...what if there is SO much energy available through the device, that it can easily be turned into something that generates an uncontrolled
reaction that makes Hiroshima look like a firecracker? And what if the principle of operation is so simple that anybody with a little electrica
knowledge could cause the device to do that?
If there are thousands of such patents, you can expect hundreds of thousands of people to at least theoretically know how to build such a device (few
people would actually look for patents, if it was easily built, they'd just use it and watch their backs for big oil's thugs). in that case, secrecy
just prevents us all from developing awareness, and ultimately, a remedy.
i have a question for you: what would gov'ts be more afraid of?
- a new doomsday bomb
OR
- a way to easily control nuclear reactions and, by extension, disable nuclear weapons
i think we all know the answer, don't we?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-8-2006 @ 12:15 PM by Boenoid
|
Originally posted by Mystery_Lady
The only problem I can see if some one develops an enegry device that almost anyone can create and puts it on the net for everyone to see without
getting a patient. Some major company or government agent will see it, patient it themselves, and have it classified. Then they would go after any one
and everyone who had the information freely published on the net claiming they somehow stole the information, or apply pressure to have them remove
the information.
That's not how patents work. Once something has been revealed to the public, no one can patent it.
In the US, the inventor has one year to patent something after a release to the public, or an "offer for sale" to anyone. No one else can
patent it. Overseas, the inventor instantly loses the right to patent after a release to the public.
As your local neighborhood Boeing Boenoid, I can assure you that the energy companies are far outnumbered by the other giant companies that
use electricity and power. If "free energy" existed and worked, Boeing would desperately want it to power our airplanes and helicopters and
satellites and missles.
Fuel is the single largest recurring expense in operating a jetliner - that's why Boeing is spending billions of dollars making the 787 which will
use 20% less fuel.
Fuel is one of the most vital things to transport to a battlefield, and one of the most difficult. If "free energy" existed and Uncle Sam knew
about it, then all our fighter jets and tanks would be running on it.
-Boenoid
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 26-8-2006 @ 02:07 PM by spinstopshere
|
One of those is mine it is called the pie engine it runs of pie. O crap of to jail I go.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 10:21 AM by StellarX
|
Originally posted by Boenoid
As your local neighborhood Boeing Boenoid, I can assure you that the energy companies are far outnumbered by the other giant companies that use
electricity and power.
Sure and the number of people who eat food vastly outnumber those who produce it which does not lead to everyone being able to eat and instead results
in a billion odd people going to be hungry every night.
If "free energy" existed and worked, Boeing would desperately want it to power our airplanes and helicopters and satellites and missles.
Why? It's a advantage all other airlines and manufacturers will quickly copy with the net result that no great advantage is gained? In fact isn't
there the risk that very small power sources may lead to a revolution in mass transport by making it in many ways redundant?
Fuel is the single largest recurring expense in operating a jetliner - that's why Boeing is spending billions of dollars making the 787 which
will use 20% less fuel.
That's not why they are building the 787 ( anyone heard of the A380?) but the fact that they must means that they also have to do something that can
actually compete. Since it wont be in shear size and technological edge it is aiming to emulate the savings made trough larger size by composites and
other operational/production savings.
Fuel is one of the most vital things to transport to a battlefield, and one of the most difficult.
And also something the other guy has to do too; there is no point to simplify logistics and general war fighting when it would mean complete
refurbishment .
If "free energy" existed and Uncle Sam knew about it, then all our fighter jets and tanks would be running on it.
-Boenoid
Why? Why could uncle Sam not even keep up with Soviet spending in the 80's leading to a massive national debt and failing infrastructure before the
USSR decided it had a sufficiently useful strategic lead to start a massive reform process? Why has the US economic situation not improved since and
what is to be gained when all countries can suddenly deploy more fighting systems now that significant savings have been made in terms of supply
trains? What would happen other than combat becoming still more lethal yet?
Stellar
[edit on 16-7-2008 by StellarX]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 10:40 AM by sir_chancealot
|
  
People that develop this "free energy" systems fall into the same trap that the elite fall into. They want money and/or power.
If you ever discover "free energy", put the blueprints and plans on the internet, and give it away. Once more than a few people have built it, and
found that it works, then it will be unstoppable.
But notice, they all want money, money, money. EVEN IF YOU DEVELOP SOMETHING LIKE THIS, YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO MAKE MONEY ON IT. Giving it away
into the public domain is the only viable alternative.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 10:44 AM by sir_chancealot
|
Originally posted by MrMorden
There could be a legitimate reason such patents are kept out of public view.
For example, let's say there is some fancy zero point energy generator that liberates energy from the quantum vacuum, and can be used to power all
sorts of devices with no fuel, no moving parts, and no byproducts. A dream come true, give one to everybody, right?
Not so fast...what if there is SO much energy available through the device, that it can easily be turned into something that generates an uncontrolled
reaction that makes Hiroshima look like a firecracker? And what if the principle of operation is so simple that anybody with a little electrica
knowledge could cause the device to do that?
You start passing these things out, it's like putting a nuke in every home in the US (or the world)...I like people, but I don't think I'd trust
them with that.
The point is, not every reason for keeping something secret is a sinister reason.
[edit on 15-8-2006 by MrMorden]
[edit on 15-8-2006 by MrMorden]
I'll say one thing about everyone having a nuke. We'd be a LOT more polite as a society.
If everyone had the equivalent of a nuke, I think judges would be a little quicker to render true justice, and not strict adherence to "the law".
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 11:06 AM by duffster
|
I can not find the video of a guy talking about Patents He was saying the same thing over 3000 devices that we can use for free energy But they are
in some big w/house with dust on them
181. Secrecy of certain inventions and withholding of patent
Whenever publication or disclosure by the publication of an application or by the grant of a patent on an invention in which the Government has a
property interest might, in the opinion of the head of the interested Government agency, be detrimental to the national security, the Commissioner of
Patents upon being so notified shall order that the invention be kept secret and shall withhold the publication of the application or the grant of a
patent therefor under the conditions set forth hereinafter
www.bitlaw.com...
Makes you wonder how many other devices have been put in that w/house Free energy Health and the list would go on
And who says they are not holding us back
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 12:38 AM by undermind
|
Originally posted by MrMorden
There could be a legitimate reason such patents are kept out of public view.
For example, let's say there is some fancy zero point energy generator that liberates energy from the quantum vacuum....
A dream come true, give one to everybody, right?
Not so fast...what if there is SO much energy available through the device, that it can easily be turned into something that generates an uncontrolled
reaction that makes Hiroshima look like a firecracker?
The point is, not every reason for keeping something secret is a sinister reason.
I think you are on the right track here.
Energy is second only to wages as an operating cost.
If the fuel market suddenly loses all value, then that would be one major MAJOR geopolitical shift. Saudi Arabia anyone? Things would move too fast
for them to keep control.
Imagine if every little tinpot gangster in the world - like Mugabe for example - could suddenly cut the fuel bill to zero, a lot more money for
themselves and corrupt judges, mercenaries, bigger weapons, more wars.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 03:46 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 06:22 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 07:47 AM by hinky
|
I find this stuff fascinating.
A person just needs to research a little bit to find out about The Invention Secrecy Act passed in 1917 as a wartime measure to prevent publication of
inventions that might be detrimental to the public safety or defense or might assist the enemy or endanger the successful prosecution of the war. This
measure ended with the conclusion of the war.
The act was resurrected again in 1940 and extended to the end of the war.
Then in 1951 it was again reinstated with the following provisions: the secrecy orders be kept no longer than one year unless renewed. There was a
catch, the act also stated that a secrecy order in effect, or issued, during a national emergency declared by the President shall remain in effect for
the duration of the national emergency and six months after. Now Truman had an emergency that lasted from 1951 to September of 1978.
If a guy wanted to look a little deeper, he's look into Special Laws Administration Unit or Armed Services Patent Advisory Board. There may be
limited information on the first group within the internet community.
I know of a patent that was classified in 1917 that only saw the light of day in 1999. It had to do with radio stuff, but the technology was
considered finally obsolete so it was released.
Wiki has an article about this act which is partially correct. Normal for them. It does list the number of secret patents being held. More than 3000
regardless.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 08:56 AM by GEORGETHEGREEK
|
GUESS WHAT!?!?!?
During the second world war my granfather had his motorbike converted...
you know at the time fuel was not easy to find...
you know what my fathers old man did?
with his limited resources he extracted gas from coal and ran his bike on that gas!!!!
amazing yes?!
the bludy bike is still there in the village!
all of this 70 years ago!
today we cannot divide bananas between two monkeys
Farewell
GIO
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|