Yeah i see what you mean, photshop work in process lol
|
Yeah i see what you mean, photshop work in process lol
|
Yeah i see what you mean, photshop work in process lol
|
Yeah i see what you mean, photshop work in process lol
|
Yeah i see what you mean, photshop work in process lol
|
AHHH sorry dam internet so slow i kept clicking post reply PLEASE ignore repetitive post
|
Good eye Doc,I see what you mean.I've seen thus pic before and always thought it looked authentic.Now I ain't so sure.
|
Two points: looking at the zoomed image (third image down), you can see where branches have been 'edited away' from in front of the UFO; there's a
sort of ghost extension of the ends of the existing twigs. Also, the edge of the disc at around eight o'clock is noticably sharper than around the
rest, which looks like clumsy use of the blur tool. I'm inclined to write this one off as Photoshopped.
www.ufoevidence.org...
[edit on 9-6-2007 by PersonFromPorlock]
|
The Debunking on this is really funny, First off I showed these to a professional photographer, He said this is a Natural effect due to bright light
and zooming in a on thin object. He gets it all the time at sporting events. With bad lenses on a camera he says the effect is even worse and has seen
light wrap around people standing in front of bright lights. See below pictures, this is me, the light above me is about 10 to 15 ft, this is right
off the camera, Par64 Light Can one in White, One in Red, it happens with cheap cameras. And the person who says its a photoshop job know NOTHING
about photoshop or imaging now that the debunker has been debunked. Let get back to looking at how good this photo actually is.
|
I agree shiftrio,
This photo is not debunked. In order to debunk this photo you would have to know how extraterresrial technology affects pictures and videos. People
are so quick to call these photos a fake and some people are so quick to believe the debunker.
Also, if you look at the pic, you can see the branches covering the red light. I think shiftrio's photo person explained it perfectly.
Also the two of the three lights have a almost perfect shape to them but the light covering the branch is distorted because of the branch. If this
was photoshoped the light over the branch would still hold the same shape as the other two lights.
[edit on 20-7-2007 by polomontana]
|
wow looks real to me. And whoever posted above me you posted like 999 times.
|
