It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byrd
You're welcome. Sometimes I feel you must think I'm some sort of spectre, haunting some of your threads!
Could you link to that? It's not that I doubt this, it's just that I'm not familiar with the story.
Egypt’s Cultural Heritage under Threat of Destruction
This October (2005) concern is again being raised about the damage being done by the encroachment of agricultural land on Egyptian monuments. Egyptian reliefs and even whole monuments dating back thousands of years could disappear within a decade if action is not taken soon. To try and combat the rise in the water table that traditional methods of framing creates the government is trying to persuade farmers to use drip irrigation, a method that uses relatively little water. However, it has had little success because farmers prefer the traditional method of flooding farmland with Nile water. Draining the area around archaeological sites is also an effective solution but is expensive, and donations from the international community are not always forthcoming. Although a Spanish Mission working at the Temple of Horus at Edfu, are trying to find solutions to this problem by using the latest technology to combat the rise in the water table that is threatening to undermine the temple. One solution may be to dig a trench around the temple and fill it with gravel to drain the area and then use hydrological sensors to monitor the level of water.
Are you confusing Ron Wyatt with Hawass?
That's Wyatt again, not Hawass. Wyatt says he found them in the Red Sea, but the charts he shows are from US waters and nobody has ever actually seen those artifacts.
Mary Nell] cites Ron's discovery of a wheel hub that he brought to the surface in the late 1970s as proof. The hub had the remains of eight spokes radiating outward and was examined by Nassif Mohammed Hassan, director of Antiquities in Cairo. Hassan declared it to be from the 18th Dynasty of ancient Egypt, explaining the eight-spoked wheel was used only during that dynasty around 1400 B.C. Curiously, no one can account for the precise whereabouts of that eight-spoked wheel today, though Hassan is on videotape stating his conclusion regarding authenticity.
I've been reading about some of the even earlier peoples (10,000 years ago) in the area -- archaeologists and scholars know that they made some attempt to domesticate gazelles and that they had extensive trade routes throughout the Mediterranean and up into Turkey.
(sigh) But that's not as interesting as some wild speculation about pyramids and Orion.
Oh, I'll grant you he's a grand egoist. And he has some odd beliefs (he thoroughly believes in Edgar Cayce.) But as far as who verifies the finds, Hawass doesn't make any of them these days. He sits in an office, and the digs are done by universities around the world:
... and on, and on and on. These are the people doing the digs.
Heh. It's just that you
Originally posted by Shane
Originally posted by Byrd
How do you tell latitude and longitude with no modern measuring tools?
Review Miller's site. There is, that tool.
And I found this interesting.
www.math.uncc.edu...
The Origins of Geometry
The Greek historian Herodotus (5th century B.C.) credits the Egyptians with having originated the subject, but there is much evidence that the Babylonians, the Hindu civilization, and the Chinese knew much of what was passed along to the Egyptians. (STRANGE WORDING HERE)
The Babylonians of 2,000 to 1,600 B.C knew much about navigation and astronomy, which required a knowledge of geometry.
They also considered the circumference of the circle to be three times the diameter.
www.math.uncc.edu...
Spherical Geometry
Whereas basic plane geometry is concerned with points and lines and their interactions, most of the early geometry of the Babylonians, Arabs, and Greeks was spherical geometry--the study of the Earth, idealized as a sphere. This early science was astronomy and the need to measure time accurately by the sun.
Now, even with your arguement of the Age of the Great Pyramid, (2700 BC roughly) is it not apparent, the Egyptians had this knowledge as well?
"HEY BYRD, WHAT ABOUT ME??? Are you suggesting I am a Fluke?'
I also have problems with this aspect, of what you are suggesting, that this knowledge was not apparent. (Measuring of the Earth).
www.siriusresearchgroup.com...
It also should be mentioned that Agatharchides of Knidos, the historian and geographer who lived in 2nd century BC, recorded among other things that the base length of the Great Pyramid corresponds to 1/8 arc minute of one degree of geographic latitude. The distance from the equator to 10° of latitude corresponds to 1,105,867 m. One arc minute is equal to 1,843.11 m and 1/8 of that is 230.38896 m. Since the base length of the Great Pyramid consists of 230.38699 m, the difference amounts to only 1.97 mm.
There appears to be a rigorous relationship between Phi, the Royal Cubit and the meter. But would this relation apply to Phi, the inch and the statute mile?
Nobody can say for sure where the inch and the statute mile came from. There is no rational relationship between the two. The present definition of an inch is 2.5399956 cm. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches and 1 yard equals 3 feet, one can derive a statute mile of 1,609.341 m from 5280 feet.
By using 2Ö j = 2.544... as a factor, a relationship between Phi and the inch can also be established. [ 2Ö j × 12 × 5280 (feet) = 161190.33]. Using Ö j = 1.27201965 as a factor one arrives fairly close at the mean diameter of the Earth (polar diameter plus equator diameter divided by 2) in meters. Thus, based on the relationship of Phi, it seems the dimensions of the Great Pyramid accurately represent Earth's mean diameter and its mean circumference in both inch and in meter.
Originally posted by Harte
I'd never heard that about Newton, but I'm sure there's a lot I don't know about the father of the calculus.
The Longitude Problem
In 1714 the question of finding the longitude at sea, which had been looked upon as an important one for several years, was brought into prominence by a petition presented to the House of Commons by a number of captains of Her Majesty's ships and merchant ships and of London merchants. The petition was referred to a committee of the House, who called witnesses. Newton appeared before them and gave evidence. He stated that for determining the longitude at sea there had been several projects, true in theory but difficult to execute. He mentioned four:
by a watch to keep time exactly
by the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites
by the place of the moon
by a new method proposed by Mr Ditton.
Newton criticized all the methods, pointing out their weak points, and it is due mainly to his evidence that the Committee brought in the report which was accepted by the House, and shortly afterwards was converted into a Bill, passed both Houses, and received the royal assent. The report ran "that it is the opinion of this committee that a reward be settled by Parliament upon such person or persons as shall discover a more certain and practicable method of ascertaining the longitude than any yet in practice; and the said reward be proportioned to the degree of exactness to which the said method shall reach."
Not that any of this matters at all, since the Egyptians didn't need to know anything about longitude in any case. I only mentioned it because, like I said, it was a ridiculous (and unsubstantiated) claim made by Miller early on in his webpage. Further reading only revealed his "method" for finding local times, which, pardon me, I don't think anyone would put beyond the ken of ancient humans, after a certain period, anyway.
Harte
Originally posted by Shane
en.wikipedia.org...
...He stated that for determining the longitude at sea there had been several projects, true in theory but difficult to execute. He mentioned four:
by a watch to keep time exactly
by the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites
by the place of the moon
by a new method proposed by Mr Ditton....
...WILLIAM WHISTON: All that would be needed is a straight row of 20 or 30 warships somehow permanently anchored across the Atlantic. At midnight each night, the ships would fire off large sky rockets, which could be seen or heard for 100 miles around. With the explosions, mariners will always know when it is midnight in Greenwich and will be able to determine their longitude by comparing Greenwich time to the local time on board their ship.
Source of both above references:www.pbs.org...
...ISAAC NEWTON: I have told the world oftener than once that longitude is not to be found by watchmakers but by the ablest astronomers. I am unwilling to meddle with any other method than the right one.
DAVA SOBEL VO: Newton really prejudiced the Board by saying in no uncertain terms that no clock would ever succeed in finding the longitude
Originally posted by Shane
Do you see what I am noting. What Miller is suggesting is not unfeasible, since in the End, it is the manner, which you, yourself had noted earlier, that Egyptians would have taken on a construction project. Some sticks and a Rock on a string.
Originally posted by ShaneIt is also quite clear, this knowledge was evident within the Mid East according to some of the Geometry links noted before, and part of what was noted was navigation. Egypt is noted as part of these who knew and actually set geometry in motion.
That means, between 1800 BC to 1700 AD, this knowledge was lost or I think Miller is suggesting hidden, which I am starting to have difficulties with.
Originally posted by ShaneAs for the basic principle laid out by Miller, it was all Astronomy, and the Zodiac. And that simple little device called a celtic cross, allows this to be measured. (According to his claims, and patents.)
Originally posted by ShaneI understand what it is you are notings Harte. My questions, with all of this, would revolve around Maintaining the GIZAMT. I can understand how they would be able to denote the Time during the Night, and figure the time at Giza...
Originally posted by Long Lance
the stars don't change much, so you can use them to measure the earth's revolution just as well as you can use the sun, the only difference being an accumulative deviation of ~ a degree or (4 minutes) per day, by comparing the two measurements and taking the date into account (enabling you to calculate offset) wouldn't you have just what you need, namely the clock to derive your longitude ?
Originally posted by Harte
There's no reason to believe at all that the Egyptians could find longitude. Hence no reason to believe that this knowledge was somehow "lost."
But Miller doesn't lay out any procedure at all for some faraway traveler to determine what you have called the GIZAMT. The Celtic Cross certainly cannot do this.
Anyway, now I've debunked (ONE) two items at Miller's page, without much effort. The longitude (YES) problem of the ancients and Miller's assertion that Newton had a method for astronomically (IS THIS WHAT HE WAS SAYING? I didn't see it THAT way) determining longitude.
Should I dig further? (YES) What are you, biased toward the Celts (or their cross, anyway)?
Harte
Originally posted by Shane
...I thought Miller was suggesting Newton may have known, due to his intelligence, and may have not said anything because of his intelligence. Not that he had any suggestions or offered anything.
You see, by this time there was no longer an instrument capable of measuring the clock face of the circumpolar stars and Sir Isaac Newton who said that Longitude could be discovered through astronomy was surely aware of the principles involved, but perhaps he could not speak out about the cross for fear of offending the Church of the time.
Originally posted by Shane...For Charting the Stars, and Locating the Sun, even during the Night, yes, this should work. For assessing the Seasons, and measuring the Angles of the Sun, yes, this should work. For Construction purposes, I would expect you would even agree, this should work, for laying out the Angles, and Alignment.
Originally posted by ShaneI am not a brick, (even though at times, I guess you wonder), but I am not Kreskin neither. I have no clue, what you are thinking when the details offered amounts to 4 words.
Having your explaination, afforded me an opportunity to consider these carefully. Reviewing texts, based on your responses, and Byrd's additional thoughts, I still see inconsistancies, but I do believe, your 'This would not work' for Longitude is correct.
But 'This would not work' doesn't allow me, to learn anything my friend. If I need to be told something, then what is the use of Thinking? I want to know, why 'This would not work' and only with an understanding of your thoughts, and appropriate consideration, can we learn why, 'This would not work'.
I trust you understand what I mean Harte.
I have had many 'learning experiences' based on the Idea's "Others have offered" and in this case, I learnt more on a matter, I had no previously use for. The furtherest I navigate is to the next Bass Hole, or to a destination on a Map.
But I hope, you will remember this, because if I learnt something through your efforts to fully explain, then all who review this, also are able to learn. And is this not why we are here?
my emphasis
You see, by this time there was no longer an instrument capable of measuring the clock face of the circumpolar stars and Sir Isaac Newton who said that Longitude could be discovered through astronomy was surely aware of the principles involved, but perhaps he could not speak out about the cross for fear of offending the Church of the time.
"...surely aware of the principles involved, but perhaps he could not speak out about the cross for fear of offending the Church of the time" is an attempt to say that not only had Newton solved the problem, but also that he had done it with the Celtic cross!
A number of devices were used to measure the Sun's noon altitude. Among them were the quadrant, cross staff and, later, the back staff and the mariner's astrolabe. All these devices had a single use; to measure the altitude of a celestial body above the horizon. The Mariner's Astrolabe, which was popular in the late 15th and early 16th centuries, was a simple brass ring, graduated in degrees with a rotating alidade for sighting the Sun or a star.
The major problem with back-sight instruments was that it was difficult if not impossible to sight the moon, the planets or the stars. Thus, toward the end of the 1600's and into the 1700's, the more inventive instrument makers were shifting their focus to optical systems based on mirrors and prisms that could be used to observe the nighttime celestial bodies.
The critical development was made independently and almost simultaneously by John Hadley in England and by Thomas Godfrey, a Philadelphia glazier, about 1731. The fundamental idea is to use of two mirrors to make a doubly reflecting instrument-the forerunner of the modern sextant.
The missing element was a way to measure time accurately. The clock makers were busy inventing ingenious mechanical devices while the astronomers were promoting a celestial method called "lunar distances". Think of the moon as the hand of a clock moving across a clock face represented by the other celestial bodies. Early in the 18th century, the astronomers had developed a method for predicting the angular distance between the moon and the sun, the planets or selected stars. Using this technique, the navigator at sea could measure the angle between the moon and a celestial body, calculate the time at which the moon and the celestial body would be precisely at that angular distance. This gives the time back at the national observatory (GIZAMT?) at the moment that the observation was taken which is then compared with the ship's chronometer. Knowing the correct time, the navigator could now determine longitude. When the sun passes through the observer's meridian, the local solar time is 1200 noon and this is compared to Greenwich Mean Time. Remembering that 15 degrees of longitude is equivalent to one hour of time gives us the longitude east or west of Greenwich. The lunar distance method of telling time was still being used into the early 1900's
Sir Isaac Newton invented the principle of the doubly reflecting navigation instrument, but never published it.
Astronomy: combining his work in mathematics, statics, and optics, he was able to predict the motions of bodies in the heavens, and build a practical reflecting telescope to see them. His improvements to instrumentation also extended to a better sextant, and an enormous composite burning glass.
Originally posted by Harte" You see, by this time there was no longer an instrument capable of measuring the clock face of the circumpolar stars and Sir Isaac Newton ...was surely aware of the principles involved, but perhaps he could not speak out about the cross for fear of offending the Church of the time" is an attempt to say that not only had Newton solved the problem, but also that he had done it with the Celtic cross!
Originally posted by Shane
The missing element was a way to measure time accurately...
... the astronomers were promoting a celestial method called "lunar distances". Think of the moon as the hand of a clock moving across a clock face represented by the other celestial bodies. Early in the 18th century, the astronomers had developed a method for predicting the angular distance between the moon and the sun, the planets or selected stars. Using this technique, the navigator at sea could measure the angle between the moon and a celestial body, calculate the time at which the moon and the celestial body would be precisely at that angular distance. This gives the time back at the national observatory (GIZAMT?) at the moment that the observation was taken which is then compared with the ship's chronometer. Knowing the correct time, the navigator could now determine longitude. When the sun passes through the observer's meridian, the local solar time is 1200 noon and this is compared to Greenwich Mean Time. Remembering that 15 degrees of longitude is equivalent to one hour of time gives us the longitude east or west of Greenwich. The lunar distance method of telling time was still being used into the early 1900's
In 1714 the question of finding the longitude at sea, which had been looked upon as an important one for several years, was brought into prominence by a petition presented to the House of Commons by a number of captains of Her Majesty's ships and merchant ships and of London merchants...
Newton appeared before them and gave evidence. He stated that for determining the longitude at sea there had been several projects...
He mentioned four:
by a watch to keep time exactly
by the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites
by the place of the moon
by a new method proposed by Mr Ditton.
Newton criticized all the methods, pointing out their weak points...
Originally posted by ShaneSo, was Miller making up things just so you had to buy his book, and irritating you to the point of claiming Blatant lies, or is Miller just a indicating fact Newton knew, and speculating on why he did not develope it? Because it does seem, Newton knew the principles invloved.
The wheel is also marked with the ancient wind rose as well as the 36 decans of the ancient Egyptian Astrologers
Originally posted by Shane
So, was Miller making up things just so you had to buy his book, and irritating you to the point of claiming Blatant lies, or is Miller just a indicating fact Newton knew, and speculating on why he did not develope it? Because it does seem, Newton knew the principles invloved.
Originally posted by Byrd
Miller was indulging in Bad Research, and he should honestly be ashamed of himself for it. He has his own "version" of history that draws from a number of sources he finds reliable, but they are not as deep as they should be (and some are unreliable) and his scholarly knowledge of ancient cultures isn't as deep as it should be, either.
Originally posted by beforebc
The Celtic Cross which is the subject of Miller's book, The Golden Thread of Time - which I have read BTW was patented at his own expense - before the book was written.
bc
.\
Originally posted by Byrd
(chuckle)
he's simply redesigned an instrument that's been in use since 1800 BC (about a thousand years after the pyramids started being built.)
The part I find unconvincing (and the others who study ancient cultures would find unconvincing) is that there's no celtic cross designs in the ancient societies that use engineering.
This quote from Crichton Miller's site also raised my eyebrows:
The wheel is also marked with the ancient wind rose as well as the 36 decans of the ancient Egyptian Astrologers
It's only accurate if he means "ancient Egyptian astrologers who lived after 200 BC or thereabouts."
Originally posted by Shane
What would you say to this then Byrd.
Has he 'redesigned an Instrument' or has he just figured out what the Cross and Circle that this Earth refers to as a Celtic Cross actually did?
Would not these markers in Ireland and Such, have been an appropriate tool for aligning, items such as Stonehedge? If, of course, the Wheel functioned?
My next question becomes, Just how secretive where the Driuds, and what eventually was their means of leaving the messages they are presumed to have left their followers, the Celt's? Was it not IN STONE?
And you are now meaning, the Greek's who picked on the Geometry of the Sphere again, which was from Babylon, Right?
And this is evident in the Temple of Hathor that Ptolemaics placed on Ceiling, for the dating you have noted? Just trying to put it all together.
Originally posted by Byrd
He scrambles times, cultures, and technologies just as I did in the paragraph above..................
.............They don't tell you the direction of sunrise and sunset on important days of the year, and they don't function as a moon calendar.